On 10/06/2017 02:04 PM, Martell Malone wrote:
> The winpthreads patch LGTM.
> Will need someone else to approve/comment on the gendef patch.
Pushed the winpthreads patch to master, dropped the gendef patch for now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 10/06/2017 05:40 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On 10/6/17, JonY via Mingw-w64-public
> wrote:
>> Patches OK?
>
> gendef fallthrough patch looks bogus to me.
>
Should it follow the patterns more strictly?
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2017/03/10/wimplicit-fallthrough-in-gcc-7/
signature.asc
On 10/6/17, JonY via Mingw-w64-public
wrote:
> Patches OK?
gendef fallthrough patch looks bogus to me.
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link
Hello JonY,
the winpthread patch is ok. But I have to agree that this
"fallthrough feature" of gcc is more or less pretty bad ...
Regards,
Kai
2017-10-06 15:52 GMT+02:00 JonY via Mingw-w64-public
:
> Patches OK?
>
>
> -
The winpthreads patch LGTM.
Will need someone else to approve/comment on the gendef patch.
On Fri 6 Oct 2017 at 06:54, JonY via Mingw-w64-public <
mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Patches OK?
>
>
> --
> Ch
Patches OK?
From 8f28e1c607c0acf90ebbf37e1169c5099dc732b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:36:55 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] gendef: Fix remaining fallthrough cases
Based on a patch by Marty Plummer
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gma
