Hi,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, Jon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
a) yes, b) yes (we need people in charge for that and doing this
reliable), c) yes, we are actual in discussion with mingw-builds
venture to go together (and/or co-operate more
- package gnustep which will help test the objc toolchain
Have you seen http://www.cocotron.org/ too?
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, Jon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
a)
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, Ray Donnelly wrote:
- package gnustep which will help test the objc toolchain
Have you seen http://www.cocotron.org/ too?
I hadn't. It's interesting but at the same time, I'm a bit worried
because they mention patching ld and gcc. =/
In any case, I'll have a look at
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com wrote:
...SNIP...
But interpreting or implying or inferring is not useful. Explicit
clarification
from Kai and JonY as mingw-w64 leaders is needed. I suspect one reason why
this hasn't
happened is that both already have too much
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013, Baruch Burstein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jon jon.for...@gmail.com wrote:
But interpreting or implying or inferring is not useful. Explicit
clarification
from Kai and JonY as mingw-w64 leaders is needed. I suspect one reason why
this hasn't
happened
2013/7/10 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com:
While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe
a year ago, only to find out
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:04 +0200
Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
2013/7/10 Jon jon.for...@gmail.com:
While the question about what current users are using is already hard
to answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there
that aren't already using
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Nader [mailto:adr...@notk.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:31 PM
To: Ruben Van Boxem
Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] End of rubenvb builds
Hi,
Sorry for answering that late, I was away a bit and could
On 10.7.2013 8:58, Koehne Kai wrote:
While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe a
year ago, only to find out that
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Martin Mitáš wrote:
On 10.7.2013 8:58, Koehne Kai wrote:
While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, Koehne Kai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adrien Nader [mailto:adr...@notk.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2013 2:31 PM
To: Ruben Van Boxem
Cc: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] End of rubenvb builds
Hi,
Sorry
While the question about what current users are using is already hard to
answer, there's IMO a bigger one: What _potential_ users are there that
aren't already using mingw-w64 :) I started looking into mingw-w64 maybe
a year ago, only to find out that
- there's no 'official'
Hi,
Sorry for answering that late, I was away a bit and could catch up
properly only now.
This email is unfortunately a bit long, sorry for that too.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the
--
Alexpux
Отправлено с помощью Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
воскресенье, 7 июля 2013 г. в 16:31, Adrien Nader написал:
Hi,
Sorry for answering that late, I was away a bit and could catch up
properly only now.
This email is unfortunately a bit long, sorry for that
On 6/25/2013 23:07, Jon wrote:
But it's a Bad Thing that mingw-w64 doesn't have official, user-friendly
toolchains,
even if (for pragmatic reasons) only windows hosted and a linux host
cross-compilers
are provided. The current automated builds (apparently targeted to internal
testing
2013/6/24 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little
to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you
Hello Ruben,
2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Ruben,
2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly
2013/6/24 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hello Ruben,
2013/6/23 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little
to
the table
I wanted to compile GNUStep(objc) on windows because I would like to
debug something and thus I prefer compile everything
on windows and not cross-compile from linux.
A few years ago I have built an environment(called MaxGW :-) consisting
in the msys+mingw and their package manager mingw-get
but
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude
of configurations available at mingw-builds. Comparing download numbers
they have a
Hello Ruben!
OOooohhh NOoO!!!
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you to use
I used your builds too. I dont remember why, probably cause it was the
first one I found that just worked. I'll give the mingw-builds a try.
Thank you for your work.
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:04 PM, K. Frank kfrank2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Ruben!
OOooohhh NOoO!!!
On Sun, Jun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.06.2013 17:15, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a
2013/6/23 LRN lrn1...@gmail.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23.06.2013 17:15, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little
to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage
And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
repository.txt or some such). We really need a build that just works. (I
know, your
2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com
And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
repository.txt or some such). We
Le 23/06/2013 21:00, Ruben Van Boxem a écrit :
I didn't even know they had an installer. Just download the zips:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/files/?source=navbar
And be done with it. I tend to avoid installers when it comes to
development related things.
Ruben
just take a
2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein bmburst...@gmail.com
And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
repository.txt or some such). We
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein
And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
downloaded their recommended installer (the download button on the front
page), and when tried to run it, it didn't work (couldn't download
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Earnie Boyd
ear...@users.sourceforge.netwrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Alexey Pavlov wrote:
2013/6/23 Baruch Burstein
And of course, as expected. I just went to try the mingw-builds, and
downloaded their recommended installer (the download
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have come to the conclusion that my MinGW-w64 builds bring too little to
the table for me to continue maintaining them.
I strongly encourage you to use the plethora of toolchains in a multitude of
33 matches
Mail list logo
