> RC has been out forever without much feedback.
Ahh. I did not know this.
Looking back thru the archive, I see the announcements came during a
time (Feb 25 & Mar 25) when I was not following the list. I didn't tune
back in until July.
Of course this does raise another obvious question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/19/2016 07:23, David Wohlferd wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 3:28 PM, JonY wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 10/19/2016 04:18, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>>> On 18 Oct, David Wohlferd wrote :
Is there an official
On 10/18/2016 3:28 PM, JonY wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 10/19/2016 04:18, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
>> On 18 Oct, David Wohlferd wrote :
>>> Is there an official list of release criteria for mingw-w64 v5?
>>> Or a targeted release date? I'm not seeing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/19/2016 04:18, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote:
> On 18 Oct, David Wohlferd wrote :
>> Is there an official list of release criteria for mingw-w64 v5?
>> Or a targeted release date? I'm not seeing anything on the web
>> site.
>
> It would be nice
On 18 Oct, David Wohlferd wrote :
> Is there an official list of release criteria for mingw-w64 v5? Or a
> targeted release date? I'm not seeing anything on the web site.
It would be nice to have a release, indeed.
Btw, there is still the MACRO bug about IN6_IS_ADDR_MULTICAST, in
violation of
Is there an official list of release criteria for mingw-w64 v5? Or a
targeted release date? I'm not seeing anything on the web site.
I have my own list of things I'm working on (~6 items) that I'd like to
see included, assuming there is still time. I also have a few more that
I'd like to do,
