On 19.01.21 16:06, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
Would you like to test if the following patch works?
* File name: 0020-libgomp-Don-t-hard-code-MS-printf-attributes.patch
* Link:
https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-gcc/0020-libgomp-Don-t-hard-code-MS-printf-attributes.patch
在 2021-01-19 22:16, Sandro Mani 写道:
Hi
Tryting to build gcc-10 against mingw-w64-8.0.0, when compiling libgomp it
errors out with [1]
(...)
-Werror is passed when compiling libgomp (as it generally is in gcc throughout), so this causes the
build to fail. I'm unsure which is the correct
Would you like to test if the following patch works?
* File name: 0020-libgomp-Don-t-hard-code-MS-printf-attributes.patch
* Link:
https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-gcc/0020-libgomp-Don-t-hard-code-MS-printf-attributes.patch
ArchLinux also uses that patch file. Link
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Kacvinsky, Tom wrote:
Hi,
I think the important distinction here is to make between building the
compiler itself (which is a binary which you build using your existing
toolchain,
using the CRT that is default/usable there), and building the runtimes (libgcc,
libstdc++,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kacvinsky, Tom
> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 10:54 AM
> To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Mingw-w64-public] Building GCC linked against libucrt fails
>
> > In my own setup for bootstrapping a mingw cross compiler on linux, I
> > do the
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 6:46 PM, FX wrote:
>> MSYS2 distributes the gcc fortran package based on mingw-w64 (see the
>> output of pacman -Ss fortran). You can inspect how it is built by
>> consulting its PKGBUILD recipe. It is here, along with the necessary
>> patches:
FX 2015-10-04 00:57:
> Hi everyone,
Hi,
> Am I missing something?
Please read:
https://github.com/niXman/mingw-builds
--
Regards, niXman
___
Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW-W64 compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows:
> MSYS2 distributes the gcc fortran package based on mingw-w64 (see the
> output of pacman -Ss fortran). You can inspect how it is built by
> consulting its PKGBUILD recipe. It is here, along with the necessary
> patches: https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/tree/master/mingw-w64-gcc
Thanks
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:46 PM, FX wrote:
>> MSYS2 distributes the gcc fortran package based on mingw-w64 (see the
>> output of pacman -Ss fortran). You can inspect how it is built by
>> consulting its PKGBUILD recipe. It is here, along with the necessary
>> patches:
Hello.
I've finished a build with --enable-libstdcxx-debug, and this time I've
checked both the build tree and the install tree.
This is what I found on the build tree.
$ find . -name libstdc*.dll -exec ls -l {} \;
15,102,643 Sep 17 08:49
Hello.
First of all, sorry for the late reply. I ran into a bit of a problem last
week, and learned the hard way that having backups is not enough, you need
to test them every now and then.
Anyway, I've just checked the build tree for the last build I performed
(with --enable-libstdcxx-debug),
Le 07/09/2015 23:23, Paulo Caetano a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I've been experimenting building GCC with --enable-libstdcxx-debug,
> both on Linux and MSYS2, and there's one thing I'm not sure of and I
> wonder if you could help me understand it.
>
> GCC docs say that configuring GCC with
Hi,
I have not tried to build jit option for windows right now.
Nevertheless you shouldn't remove the c-languages from bootstrap as
modern gcc requires at least c++ for doing a full bootstrap.
Additionally I would recomment to specify explicit --disable-multilib
option, as this could otherwise
On 1/10/2014 17:21, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build GCC with the following triplets:
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-unknown-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-w64-mingw32
Above is OK.
I configured
2014/1/10 JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net
On 1/10/2014 17:21, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build GCC with the following triplets:
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-unknown-linux-gnu
checking target system type...
On 1/10/2014 18:46, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
2014/1/10 JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net
On 1/10/2014 17:21, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
Hi,
I'm attempting to build GCC with the following triplets:
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type...
于 2011/7/10 20:52, Earnie 写道:
I didn't think it was possible to build in the
source directory for the GCC package, when did it change? It is also
advised to build in a separate build directory instead of the source
directory so if this is reproducibly true then a bug report needs to be
open
2011/7/10 PcX xunxun1...@gmail.com
于 2011/7/10 20:52, Earnie 写道:
I didn't think it was possible to build in the
source directory for the GCC package, when did it change? It is also
advised to build in a separate build directory instead of the source
directory so if this is reproducibly
Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
2011/7/10 Earnie ear...@users.sourceforge.net
PcX wrote:
于 2011/7/10 1:55, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
Which is very odd, because the file that does not exist,
exists.
Sometimes, on msys, if your source directory and build directory
is different, the some file does not exit
JonY wrote:
On 7/10/2011 01:55, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
In an attempt to help all these people trying to build GCC
toolchains (for reasons still very mysterious to me), I attempted
modifying them to build a 32-bit to 64-bit cross-compiler and tried
running it on MSYS with my 32-bit toolchain.
于 2011/7/10 1:55, Ruben Van Boxem 写道:
Which is very odd, because the file that does not exist, exists.
Sometimes, on msys, if your source directory and build directory is
different, the some file does not exit error will appear. I don't know
this reason.
So if I build gcc on msys, I will build
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:06 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 7/3/2011 12:10, Bj Raz wrote:
I've been working on cross compiler for building w64 binaries. I just
wanted to see if I could do it :P
I'm following the directions from Linux From Scratch (modifying them as
needed).
2011/7/3 Bj Raz whitequill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:06 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 7/3/2011 12:10, Bj Raz wrote:
I've been working on cross compiler for building w64 binaries. I just
wanted to see if I could do it :P
I'm following the directions from Linux
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/7/3 Bj Raz whitequill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:06 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
On 7/3/2011 12:10, Bj Raz wrote:
I've been working on cross compiler for building w64
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/7/3 Bj Raz whitequill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/7/3 Bj Raz whitequill...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:06 AM, JonY
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 6:06 AM, JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On 7/3/2011 12:10, Bj Raz wrote:
I've been working on cross compiler for building w64 binaries. I just
wanted to see if I could do it :P
I'm following the directions from Linux From Scratch (modifying them as
needed).
On 7/4/2011 08:49, Bj Raz wrote:
/tools/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld cannot find dllcrt2.o: No such file
or directory
/tools/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld cannot find crtbegin.o: No such file
or directory
/tools/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/ld cannot find crtend.o: No such file or
directory
collect2:
I am now trying to rebuild the same GCC version (4.6-20100904) with my fresh
compiler, but getting stuck at either the stage2-stage3 comparison or if I
don't bootstrap, this:
xgcc.exe: error: C:UsersRubenAppDataLocalTempcccemHMa.lto.o: No such file or
directory
Some MSYS path problem: same
2010/9/14 John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net
This is correct. TDM64 GCC 4.5.1 is patched to remove a leading underscore
from the names of the _alloca and __chkstk symbols, in order for them to be
exported from both the 64-bit and 32-bit versions of libgcc with the same
export rule (there is
On 9/13/2010 11:34 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
M:/Development/msys/gcc-libs/lib/libmpfr.a(div.o):div.c:(.text+0xe75):
more undefined references to `__chkstk' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
How do i fix this? I'm doing a make profiledbootstrap in gcc, it has
used mpfr
2010/9/11 John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net
On 9/11/2010 12:19 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
, but nevertheless libelf (which
isn't an elf OS specific library btw) is required so that LTO works as
it should.
Trust me, it isn't! I have never installed libelf on my build machine,
but LTO is
2010/9/11 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
Hi,
Recently I started messing around with GCC and attempted to build it many
times. I first had lots of trouble with the 4.5 snapshots, but have now
moved to 4.6 and all seems well. I put all the instructions in a single file
(not quite a
2010/9/11 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com:
2010/9/11 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com
Hi,
Recently I started messing around with GCC and attempted to build it many
times. I first had lots of trouble with the 4.5 snapshots, but have now
moved to 4.6 and all seems well. I put
Hmm, I don't get this failure on cygwin as host. Have you installed
lto on msys for native compiler before proper?
Kai
I'm using TDM64 GCC 4.5.1 with lto enabled, and it works for eg building Qt
without error. I have also built and installed libelf for TDM64 GCC (it's
installed in the MSYS
2010/9/11 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com:
Hmm, I don't get this failure on cygwin as host. Have you installed
lto on msys for native compiler before proper?
Kai
I'm using TDM64 GCC 4.5.1 with lto enabled, and it works for eg building Qt
without error. I have also built and
2010/9/11 John E. / TDM tdra...@tdragon.net:
On 9/11/2010 11:50 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Well, lto normally needs not to be explicit enabled. You just need to
have the libelf library installed on you host environment.
Actually, libelf is not required to enable LTO for PE-COFF targets (i.e.
On 9/11/2010 12:19 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
, but nevertheless libelf (which
isn't an elf OS specific library btw) is required so that LTO works as
it should.
Trust me, it isn't! I have never installed libelf on my build machine,
but LTO is enabled and I see dramatic improvements when I use it.
37 matches
Mail list logo