Re: [MirageOS-devel] [Xen-devel] [RFC] Code of Conduct

2019-08-16 Thread Rich Persaud
On Aug 16, 2019, at 07:19, George Dunlap wrote: > > On 8/15/19 6:23 PM, Rich Persaud wrote: >>> On Aug 9, 2019, at 13:48, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >> >> Hi Lars, >> >>> >>> Following the discussion we h

Re: [MirageOS-devel] [Xen-devel] [RFC] Code of Conduct

2019-08-15 Thread Rich Persaud
> On Aug 9, 2019, at 13:48, Lars Kurth wrote: > > Hi all, Hi Lars, > > Following the discussion we had at the Developer Summit (see > https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Design_Sessions_2019#Community_Issues_.2F_Improvements_-_Communication.2C_Code_of_Conduct.2C_etc. > for notes) I put

Re: [MirageOS-devel] [Xen-devel] [RFC] Code of Conduct

2019-08-15 Thread Rich Persaud
On Aug 15, 2019, at 14:01, Lars Kurth wrote: > > Hi Rich, > > thanks for the feedback. I am going to > > On 15/08/2019, 18:23, "Rich Persaud" wrote: > > > On Aug 9, 2019, at 13:48, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > > Hi all, >

Re: [MirageOS-devel] [win-pv-devel] [Xen-devel] [RFC] Code of Conduct

2019-08-15 Thread Rich Persaud
> On Aug 15, 2019, at 14:46, Lars Kurth wrote: >> On 15 Aug 2019, at 19:27, Rich Persaud wrote: >> On Aug 15, 2019, at 14:01, Lars Kurth wrote: >> >>> Hi Rich, >>> >>> thanks for the feedback. I am going to >>> >>> On

Re: [MirageOS-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] Add Code Review Guide

2019-11-28 Thread Rich Persaud
On Nov 28, 2019, at 05:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 28.11.2019 01:54, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Lars Kurth wrote: >>> From: Lars Kurth >>> >>> This document highlights what reviewers such as maintainers and committers >>> look >>> for when reviewing code. It sets

Re: [MirageOS-devel] [PATCH v2 4/6] Add Code Review Guide

2019-11-28 Thread Rich Persaud
On Nov 28, 2019, at 09:05, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 28/11/2019, 07:37, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > >>On 28.11.2019 14:06, Lars Kurth wrote: >> I can certainly add something on the timing , along the lines of >> * For complex series, consider the time it takes to do reviews (maybe with a >>