Re: \uXXXX on EBCDIC systems

2017-05-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Daniel Richard G. dixit: >While UTF-8 isn't a thing in the z/OS environment, I think there could >be value in printing something that will be converted by the existing >EBCDIC->ASCII terminal/NFS conversion into correctly-formed UTF-8 >characters. […] >in the terminal. Effectively an

Re: \uXXXX on EBCDIC systems (was Re: [PATCH] IBM z/OS + EBCDIC support)

2017-05-03 Thread Daniel Richard G.
Hi Thorsten, On Wed, 2017 May 3 15:57+, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Dixi quod… > > >Use U+4DC0 HEXAGRAM FOR THE CREATIVE HEAVEN (䷀) then ☺ > > I *do* have a follow-up question for that now. > > The utf8bug-1 test fails because its output is interpreted as UTF-8, > but the UTF-8 string it