FYI -
I was able to ssh2 vith vt320term using username/password to openbsd using
sprintpcs cellphone (not the fancy palm like ones but the newer lesser
vision phones that play media and midp java apps)
application on cellphone:
MidpSSH is an SSH and Telnet client for MIDP 1.0 / 2.0 devices
At 09:40 PM 6/24/2005, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:03:31 -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I too have this same problem.
Fresh install...no custom anything...just trying to add modules to
perl, and anything tried fails 100% no matter which source I use
(even perl.org).
Whats going
Hi,
I don't know if it's a bug or not, but you don't need to reinstall.
You could edit /etc/fstab and if needed tar zxvfp base37.tgz and others
Regards
Alex
2005/6/25, asdfasdf asfdasdfasdf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The nosuid thing is the only inconsistency I've
noticed. Should I be concerned
man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7)
FILES
/var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab
/var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab
/var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs
I think there's a reason that they include the man
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 06:12:55 -0500
man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7)
FILES
/var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab
/var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab
/var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs
man cron
Ok guys, Finally i can find it :)
TIA
Neta
On 6/25/05, Schvberle Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite so.
System crontab is located in /etc but doesn't exists by default.
You have to make your own. Watch out for access rights or else
crond won't parse it.
man 5 crontab
root's
Hi,
On the Netserver I blocked Linux OS from accessing ssh port with PF
as I exclusively use OpenBSD and the problem did not
occur again but as mentioned it was replaced fairly shortly
afterwards.
How did you figure this out? I'm curious.
block in log proto tcp from any os Linux to
Hi,
I attached my 8Mb Disk-On-Key from M-Systems to my system running 3.6
dmesg shows following output:
OpenBSD 3.6 (GENERIC) #59: Fri Sep 17 12:32:57 MDT 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Geode(TM) Integrated Processor by National Semi (Geode by NSC
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Hi,
I attached my 8Mb Disk-On-Key from M-Systems to my system running 3.6
dmesg shows following output:
SNIP
ohci0 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 Compaq USB OpenHost rev 0x06: irq
11, version 1.0, legacy support
ohci0: SMM does not respond,
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005, Diana Eichert wrote:
SNIP
What does disklable sd0 return?
diana
aieh, need more kaffe.
that would be disklabel sd0
On 6/25/05, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following is what I did and what the system showed me in response:
# mount_msdos /dev/sd0a /mnt/
mount_msdos: /dev/sd0a on /mnt: Device not configured
# newfs_msdos /dev/sd0a
newfs_msdos: /dev/sd0a: Device not configured
Which device in
Hi,
Off Topic, but I'm struggling..
I have been contracted to make some network changes at a site I originally
set up 10 years ago. It started with a couple of PC's with an OpenBSD
server as the default gateway/firewall. As time went on, the site has
grown and now is 200+ computers and several
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I
put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine.
The IT
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Steven Bowers wrote:
Any comments on the Buslink drives? I found a site selling both 1.1
and 2.0 drives for a some-what reasonable price. Seems like all the
USB 2.0 stuff is 120GB or greater and $100 and up. Since I'm primarily
backing up about 1MB of data I'm not sure I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so spake Neta (netasys):
Hello All,
I have fresh install machine openbsd 3.7, i couldn't locate any /etc/crontab
?
is this crontab disable by default?
how i can enable it?
/etc/crontab is not used by default, it predates the availability
of per-user
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I
put a static route on the Windows PC, it works fine.
The IT
On 6/25/05, Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We narrowed it down by putting a static route on the Windows PC and it
worked flawlessly. I DO NOT want to try maintaining static routes on
150+ PC's of various flavors...
How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's listed in
I've had the same problem since 3.7 was released on all (vmware) machines
i've tried it on, i just copied floppy B conf over floppy C and it built
fine, I don't use the floppies anyway.
Brad
From: Raymond Lillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: floppy37C.fs image too big for
Steve Williams wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If I
put a static route on the Windows PC, it
I'd like to give a big hoot and cheer Theo and the gang. The new
kernelized PPPoE is fast enough to keep up with two MMORPG instances,
three internet radio streams, and three large downloads combining for an
average of 130kb/sec all at once, while still being 30-50% idle! It
never even came
Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.holland-consulting.net/obsd/aout-up.html
Just today a guy came up to the OpenBSD booth at LinuxTag (Karlsruhe,
Germany) and asked for help on remote updating of a client's 2.9(!)
systems located in Kansas(!). Apparently he doesn't read misc@
Steve Williams wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:08 -0600 (MDT) Steve Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has worked until recently. One of the Hospital sites has put in a
CISCO Pix 506E and it's not behaving properly with ICMP redirects. If
I
put a static route on the Windows PC, it
Don't thank me just yet. I should've checked my notes.
On 6/25/05, Steve Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about distributing static routes through DHCP? It's listed in
dhcp-options(5) as option static-routes.
OMG! What a simple solution! It's so simple it never occured to me.
No, this is not what I was asking for. Of course, we can block
by OS but what I wanted to know was, how did Steve determine that
Linux hosts were causing him grief on the Netserver running 3.6 ?
I should have been clearer. Sorry about that. Thanks nevertheless.
Mark T. Uemura
OpenBSD
Hi all,
I've been looking through all the upgrade notes etc and I can't see that
any major changes have occurred in the ppp daemon, nor the pppoe
translator that would cause me problems. However since I upgraded to
3.7 (from 3.4) I've been unable to connect to my ADSL providor.
My ppp.conf
Hi,
Just bought a WDC 250G HD. Model WD2500JB-00G.
I tried a newfs -m 1 /dev/wd3a. After newfs is over, wd3a is not mountable.
fsck can't find any usable superblock. However, when I did a newfs
/dev/wd3a, the resulting partition checks out fine (fsck is ok with it) and
mounts without problems.
5% or so is reserved for root and is not available.
When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful
if the situation does NOT apply to root.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35
Whichever definition the 'df -h' command is using. I'm assuming it's
consistent in its use itself. ;)
On Jun 25, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Chris wrote:
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
Can anyone explain this math to me?
490M - 32.8M != 433M
Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of
Matthew S Elmore wrote:
Can anyone explain this math to me?
490M - 32.8M != 433M
Not that it's a big deal but just wondering where that bit of space went.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/matt$ df -h
FilesystemSizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 490M
It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted for
when using 'df'. Hence, you can sometimes have partitions that are 105%
capacity.
Am I off base on this? It is very possible, it is very late. ;)
From the FAQ sec 14.14:
People are sometimes surprised to find they have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
490*0.05
24.5
490-24.5-32.8
432.69
Math looks to be spot on with a reserved 5%.
On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 21:48:21 -0700 Matthew S Elmore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was my understanding that this reserved space was not accounted
for
when
Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 256252180540 6290074%/
256252 blocks less 5% reserve.
This gives 243440 blocks total available for users.
less 180540 gives 62900 blocks currently available for users.
180540/243440 gives
Hi all,
I've been looking through all the upgrade notes etc and I can't see that
any major changes have occurred in the ppp daemon, nor the pppoe
translator that would cause me problems. However since I upgraded to
3.7 (from 3.4) I've been unable to connect to my ADSL providor.
My ppp.conf is
33 matches
Mail list logo
