On 29/12/2005, at 8:01 PM, RedShift wrote:
I've set up a RAID 0 set on two 9 GB SCSI disks, using an Adaptec
AAA-131U2 controller. However, when I want to install OpenBSD on it, I
get asked for which disk should be the root disk. Ofcourse, I see two
disks, sd0 and sd1. This probably means that
Changing to the source code, it would have to be able to be increased the
length of the usernames. I have done it with FreeBSD, but I don't known how
to do with OpenBSD.
roberto
2005/12/28, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What is the maximum length of username for useradd(8)?
Where is
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Changing to the source code, it would have to be able to be increased the
length of the usernames. I have done it with FreeBSD, but I don't known how
to do with OpenBSD.
roberto
2005/12/28, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What is
Nick Holland skrev:
(hint: you can do a CCD of just one disk).
(hint 2: you can't use the same partition twice, it will generate an error).
(hint 3: Errors can be your friend, they are not always to be avoided)
warning, spoiler below:
#
# /etc/ccd.conf
# Configuration file for concatenated
Hello
I installed TorrentFlux (http://www.torrentflux.com
http://www.torrentflux.com/ ) on my OpenBSD 3.8 server. All goes perfect,
everything working ok, besides, torrent uploading. I get:
ERROR: File not uploaded, file could not be found or could not be moved:
Hi guys,
I have three network interfaces, f.e. sk0 sk1 sk2, and need to create
transparent bridge so that traffic coming in on sk0 goes out on sk1
(and only), and traffic comming in on sk2 goes out on sk0.
Is it possible to create virtual interface trunk0 with children sk1 sk2
that will
[IMAGE]
Dear Central Bank of Illinois Client,
This is your official notification from Central Bank of Illinois that
the service(s) listed below
will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous
notifications have
been sent to the Billing Contact assigned to this account. As
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:31:56PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Try to increase kern.maxclusters. It is possible that the box crashed
due to network buffer shortage. pedro@ commited a fix to both
-currentand 3.8-STABLE which increases buffer on-the-fly without
panic.
Also, run a netstat -m
Hi
I have two ISP lines on which i have successfully load balanced the
outgoing traffic.
-
pfctl -f loadb.conf
-
loadb.conf
lan_net = 10.0.0.0/24
int_if = mtd0
ext_if0 = ne3
ext_gw0 = 192.168.1.1
ext_if1 = ne4
Hello,
Sometimes I don't like to install the ports tree to search for packages,
because I know what I want to install. But I don't know the exact
package name.
I've done a little script to get the index.txt from the ftp (or do a ls
*.tgz) and the search with regex in package names.
Example:
$
On 12/29/05, Jon Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great, I'll give that a shot today after I see if I can repeat the
crash. Do you happen to know what date the commit was done? I checked
MARC and couldn't seem to find the commit from Pedro after 3.8-stable.
brad@ is the -STABLE maintainer so
And the board you are talking about isn't a real RAID card. It's just a
controller that they sold to you for too much money. The RAID stack lives
actually in the driver. In other words it only works on OSs that allow binary
drivers from vendors in their tree. OpenBSD will never support that.
Let me start by saying the usual and oh so helpful/pertinent thing ...
This all works perfectly on BlankBlankOtherOS, so obviously .blah
blah blah. I told these guys to send a couple of boxes to Theo when
they were Demo-ing them last summer.
I did a stock install, then tried doing a
Has anyone on the list experience with using pf to
block ip addresses in the iana reserved ip address ranges list?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, lose the weight
Loose, adj., not tight, let go, free, loose clothing
The proper URL is http://www.linbsd.org/ethereal_on_openbsd38.html
Sorry for the mistake.
-Ober
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:25:15 -0600 (CST)
From: ober [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Ethereal 0.10.14 howto. Now with nobody support. :D
OK
this line here shows your problem:
Nvidia CK804 LAN rev 0xa3 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 not configured
there is no driver for the nforce ethernet controller simply because we have
no documentation for it.
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 11:38:22 -0500, Dave Feustel proclaimed...
Has anyone on the list experience with using pf to
block ip addresses in the iana reserved ip address ranges list?
I don't think any of us have ever thought of that.
Oh wait..I may have... run this out of cron weekly
#!/bin/sh
On Wed, December 28, 2005 7:19 pm, Marcus Tenes wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install 3.8 on my iBook from the bootable cd. I'm using
a Netgear MA111 wireless card for my network interface. It's
recognized by OpenBSD as wi0, and I select it as my the interface I'd
like to configure. Our internet
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:31:56PM +0100, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Try to increase kern.maxclusters. It is possible that the box crashed
due to network buffer shortage. pedro@ commited a fix to both
-currentand 3.8-STABLE which increases buffer on-the-fly without
panic.
Also, run a netstat -m
David Gwynne wrote:
this line here shows your problem:
Nvidia CK804 LAN rev 0xa3 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 not configured
there is no driver for the nforce ethernet controller simply because we
have no documentation for it.
ooh crap, that means ... not now, not likely ever doesn't it?
from http://www.liquifried.com/docs/security/reservednets.html
For security purposes, reserved addresses should be prevented from both
entering and leaving a network
(i.e. ingress and egress filtering). Ideally, this filtering will be
multi-layer in nature; at a minimum, this sort
of
On Thursday 29 December 2005 12:32, eric wrote:
Re: pf question
I just noticed that it's 5.0.0.0/8, not 5.0.0.0/24.
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, lose the weight
Loose, adj., not tight, let go, free, loose clothing
nve(4) exists in -current, but it's early days (see cvs log for some
details on the problems with this chip). It is not a port of the Linux
driver.
Exist a way to run python scripts in OpenBSD chrooted apache?
I read mod_python help to solve this problem but i don't find a port or
package.
Anyone help me ?
Thank you very much !
Better (IMHO) to use bgpd to suck down the 'bogon' prefixes, and then
tag them for pf, see example here:
http://www.cymru.com/BGP/bogon-rs.html
/Pete
On 29. des. 2005, at 18.32, eric wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 11:38:22 -0500, Dave Feustel proclaimed...
Has anyone on the list
On Thursday, 29 December 2005 at 10:33:47 +, John Gould wrote:
The login name may be up to 31 characters long. For compatibility with
.
Is that not long enough?
Do you know where it is defined in the source tree?
Is it advisable to change the definition to increase the maximum
Is it advisable to change the definition to increase the maximum length?
No. I strongly advise you against that.
From the *I know I'm going to get lambasted* department, a subdivision of
*I'm an idiot,* under the jusrisdiction of *now I remember why I unsubscribed
from misc* comes this blather:
I'm not a cryptographer, but strong crypto (or the lack thereof) affects us
all in serious ways. As such, I was
Also, run a netstat -m and look at peak usage. If that number is
reaching max, increase kern.maxclusters with sysctl.
$ netstat -m
1543 mbufs in use:
1539 mbufs allocated to data
1 mbuf allocated to packet headers
3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses
hi
is was playing around with a couple of attacks.
while looking at smash attacks i was supprised.
simple strcpy attack / no gcc-options (defaults)
- the stack-smash is detected in 'main'
- the stack-smash is NOT detected in 'foo'
a look at the assembler code file shows that
no code is
On 12/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-fstack-protector : Enable stack protection for functions which contain
character arrays.
-fno-stack-protector : Disable use of stack protection (ProPolice).
-fstack-protector-all : Enable stack protection for all functions.
On Thursday 29 December 2005 22.44, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-fstack-protector : Enable stack protection for functions which contain
character arrays.
-fno-stack-protector : Disable use of stack protection (ProPolice).
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:01:00 +0200, nikns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upgraded alphastation to 3.8 and first time in my life hit
alpha bug. ;)
Kernel panicked while ungziping src.tar.gz.
When I hit continue in ddb I was dropped into
other panic.
There is photos of panic, maybe it helps someone to
nve(4) exists in -current, but it's early days (see cvs log for some
details on the problems with this chip). It is not a port of the Linux
driver.
My mistake, sorry. The driver is nfe(4).
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:51:34PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:01:00 +0200, nikns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Upgraded alphastation to 3.8 and first time in my life hit
alpha bug. ;)
Kernel panicked while ungziping src.tar.gz.
When I hit continue in ddb I was dropped into
other
Hi again.
Can I rephrase this? What do you think is the likelihood of getting this
resolved? I've waited a couple of months so far, because I can't seem to
post to the list, from anything other than this googlemail account
(blueyonder.co.uk is my ISP and until now, all posts going through their
On 2005-12-29 14:16:21 -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
Please, tell me I'm an idiot and Blowfish is the best choice for crypto. Then
I won't worry anymore.
You worry too much.
How much is the data worth you are protecting? And how long do
you want it to be protected? And what makes you think that
Hi all.
I hope not to get too much stick for this and that this isn't seen as
entirely inappropriate to this list, but here goes. I'm not a computing
newbie by any means, having been an enthusiast and 'enjoyed' a career in
systems/network management. I think I can program reasonably well in
I put together a port based on Matt's previous port that works on -current
and should work on 3.8.
It replaces all the steps in the instructions.
Let me know how it works.
http://www.linbsd.org/ethereal.tgz
-Ober
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Matt Jibson wrote:
You might be interested in modifying
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:33:48 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include string.h
char *src = sehr langer string;
void foo( char * src )
{
char dst[5];
strcpy( dst, src );
strncpy( dst, src, 4 );
dst[5] = '\0';
}
--
Regards, Ed http://www.usenix.org.uk -
On 12/29/05, ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:33:48 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include stdio.h
#include string.h
char *src = sehr langer string;
void foo( char * src )
{
char dst[5];
strcpy( dst, src );
strncpy( dst, src, 4 );
dst[5] =
Well, well, well.
How helpful are the OpenBSD community? Very, in my mind.
Thanks to the advice from here, I've now decided that I'll start the
ball rolling with:
Programming in C
Kochan
ISBN: 0672326663
to get me started. I'm a bit blown away by all the hugely positive
reviews of this book, at
If it is worth doing, it is worth doing right. While I'm always
impressed with the quality of OpenBSD, this matters most to me.
On Thursday 29 December 2005 16:35, Martin Schrvder wrote:
On 2005-12-29 14:16:21 -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
Please, tell me I'm an idiot and Blowfish is the best
You're either the victim of a truncated display or lacking in
fundamental DNS knowledge.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] host 5.191.160.66
Host 66.160.191.5.in-addr.arpa not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] host dedicated5.thehideout.net
Host dedicated5.thehideout.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[EMAIL
On 12/29/05, Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-12-29 14:16:21 -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
Please, tell me I'm an idiot and Blowfish is the best choice for crypto.
Then
I won't worry anymore.
You worry too much.
You can't worry too much. There is a saying: Attacks always
On 12/29/05, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is worth doing, it is worth doing right. While I'm always
impressed with the quality of OpenBSD, this matters most to me.
and your concern is with blowfish in what context?
On Thursday 29 December 2005 16:35, Martin Schrvder wrote:
On
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:27, David Higgs wrote:
You're either the victim of a truncated display or lacking in
fundamental DNS knowledge.
I definitely lack knowledge of DNS right now.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] host 5.191.160.66
Host 66.160.191.5.in-addr.arpa not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
[EMAIL
On 12/29/05, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 29 December 2005 20:27, David Higgs wrote:
You're either the victim of a truncated display or lacking in
fundamental DNS knowledge.
I definitely lack knowledge of DNS right now.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] host 5.191.160.66
Host
For Rent
The Colony At Sable TraceNorth Port, FL30 Minutes South of Sarasota FL
NEW CONDO 1st floor (1168 SQ/FT Living)
Available Feb 1st. The Colony at Sable Trace is a new condominium gated
community withinSable Trace Golf Course (semi-private course). This 1st
floor unit offers:
* 2 Bedrooms
On Thursday 29 December 2005 19:47, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/29/05, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is worth doing, it is worth doing right. While I'm always
impressed with the quality of OpenBSD, this matters most to me.
and your concern is with blowfish in what context?
My
On 12/29/05, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 29 December 2005 19:47, Ted Unangst wrote:
and your concern is with blowfish in what context?
My concern is the strength of Blowfish--it's robustness--if someone with
a large amount of resources desired to crack it.
then don't
--- Quoting ed on 2005/12/28 at 18:40 +:
Hello,
I have the following pf.conf on two identical firewalls, which combine
two external ISP connections to a single RFC1819 network, providing
complete failover if the ISP drops off the edge of the world.
However, I notice that when I force
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Travers Buda wrote:
The key schedule in both is _much_ faster than Blowfish.
That is not a feature, at least not in the contexts where we use blowfish
most.
The password file and
others would require the use of salts in order to resist dictionary attacks,
especially of
Travers Buda wrote:
[...]
No known weaknesses exist in Blowfish, but that 64 bit block scares me.
[...]
Can you explain why it scares you ? I am not a cryptographer but I see
no reason why a cipher using
64 bit block size is scary, all of the attacks I can think of that are
tied to the block
On Friday 30 December 2005 00:08, Damien Miller wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Travers Buda wrote:
The key schedule in both is _much_ faster than Blowfish.
That is not a feature, at least not in the contexts where we use
blowfish most.
Yes, I realize that. I did not say fast key schedules are
On Monday 30 January 2006 00:22, veins wrote:
Travers Buda wrote:
[...]
No known weaknesses exist in Blowfish, but that 64 bit block scares
me. [...]
Can you explain why it scares you ? I am not a cryptographer but I
see no reason why a cipher using
64 bit block size is scary, all of the
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Travers Buda wrote:
On Friday 30 December 2005 00:08, Damien Miller wrote:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Travers Buda wrote:
The key schedule in both is _much_ faster than Blowfish.
That is not a feature, at least not in the contexts where we use
blowfish most.
Yes, I
57 matches
Mail list logo
