please cut the trolling.
the problem is not, whether or not blowfish is secure enough.
the problem is that you HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA what you are talking
about, category-wise. you can't tell why blowfish could be bad. you
can't tell which one would be better, because you don't know why.
you can't
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 11:26:50PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
Well I was contemplating the error of my ways on this thread. I realized
that I was wrong. Blowfish's implementation is secure and efficient...
from a programmer's point of view.
This can be applied to cryptography, and for my
Hello everyone.
Let me say up front, I'm no Cisco guru, although I do believe I posess a
sound understanding of networking involving multiple switches and the
potential issues associated with doing so.
I'm looking at a situation where with the introduction of two machines
employing CARP to
Original message
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:39:02 +0100
From: Said Outgajjouft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Blowfish still good enough?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Travies all crypto is breakable. The only demand on crypto is how long
in takes to break it. If it takes more than 5 years
Hi there,
Rebuilt XF4 the other day to try to track down why some clients were dying.
I believe this page here to be innacurate:
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Xbld
XF86Setup, used to configure XF3 servers on the i386 platform (and ONLY the
i386 platform) requires the tcl and tk
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 01:50:58AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
man 5 ifstated.conf says:
The init block is used to initialise the state and is executed each
time the state is entered.
But this does not seem to be true if you use 'init-state' to enter the
state. Or maybe there's something
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 05:24:53PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi there,
Rebuilt XF4 the other day to try to track down why some clients were dying.
I believe this page here to be innacurate:
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Xbld
XF86Setup, used to configure XF3 servers on the i386 platform
Hello everyone.
Let me say up front, I'm no Cisco guru, although I do believe I posess a
sound understanding of networking involving multiple switches and the
potential issues associated with doing so.
I'm looking at a situation where with the introduction of two machines
employing CARP to
I have installed getmail in my quest for a console-based pop3 mail client.
When I use getmail to retrieve email, getmail reports that the directory named
Maildir is not a maildir. What makes a maildir different from a standard
directory and how is it created?
Should I try a different pop3 mail
On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 18:06 +, Jason George wrote:
First, define the context of great instability. Within the Cisco context?
The Linux LVS context? The CARP context? Overall?
The Cisco and CARP context. Primarily noticed was that one of the three
catalysts did appear to reboot or
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 01:15:39PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
I have installed getmail in my quest for a console-based pop3 mail client.
When I use getmail to retrieve email, getmail reports that the directory
named
Maildir is not a maildir. What makes a maildir different from a standard
Edd Barrett wrote:
Hi there,
Rebuilt XF4 the other day to try to track down why some clients were dying.
I believe this page here to be innacurate:
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Xbld
XF86Setup, used to configure XF3 servers on the i386 platform (and ONLY the
i386 platform) requires
OpenBGP really rocks - shall send a few six packs to Sechelt rapids
for your next Hackaton there - thanks guys! My upstream IP transit
provider was a bit surprised when he learned that his shining Cisco
7xxx is eBGP peering - incl. MD5 sums! - since about one month to a
mighty old Compaq desktop
On 01/01/2006 11:35:19 AM, Jon Hart wrote:
The BNF seems to indicate that what you are trying to do is legal
syntax-wise. At one point I had an ifstated.conf that did something
similiar with a master switch state that was the target of
init-state
-- it would help determine what the correct
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 01:50:58AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
man 5 ifstated.conf says:
The init block is used
to initialise the state and is executed each time the
state is entered.
But this does not seem to be true if you use 'init-state'
to enter the state. Or maybe there's something
Which platform were you building other than i386?
I was building on an i386.
XF4 is the entire X tree, both X.org and XF86v3. On i386, when you
build X, you build the entire X system, X.org's and XF86v3 servers.
pick and chose building what you build is not supported, thus you
always need
Edd Barrett wrote:
Which platform were you building other than i386?
I was building on an i386.
XF4 is the entire X tree, both X.org and XF86v3. On i386, when you
build X, you build the entire X system, X.org's and XF86v3 servers.
pick and chose building what you build is not supported,
Pass abuse makes BGPd CARP not available to be use in most interesting
places due to valid MAC address registrations requirements.
One question on mac address for CARP interface. Is it possible to change
the default mac address use by carp interface from the default:
.5e00.0100 to
On Sunday 01 January 2006 05:26, Joachim Schipper wrote:
You are right, *if* your data is of such a nature that it needs to be
kept secret for tens, likely hundreds of years. In that case,
however, extending the vnd(4) device to use, at least, AES as well
should be easy. (Not that I've looked
Hello.
Can anyone recommend a good multi-port NIC card e.g. 4-port, that works
OK on OpenBSD with a good source supplier.
Regards...Martin
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:28:42AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
[...]
Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
other with carp. (net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on
both firewalls.) Each has 3 interfaces, internet,
lan, and dmz. The dmz has, say, a webserver.
Now to connect the 2 firewalls
Can anyone recommend a good multi-port NIC card e.g. 4-port, that works
OK on OpenBSD with a good source supplier.
This question was debated a few times in the archive already. So, far
there isn't one great card that works very well that still available to
purchase new these days. SK based
On a related subject and please forgive any ignorance on my part, how
would the interrupt load compare, between a multi-port NIC and the same
number of ports via individual single port NICs?
For example, a firewall with one WAN port and three LAN ports. One LAN
(and of course the WAN port) port
Is sudden appearance of a skull bones cursor on the
kde desktop associated with any exploits against kde?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, lose the weight
Loose, adj., not tight, let go, free, loose clothing
Craig McCormick wrote:
On a related subject and please forgive any ignorance on my part, how
would the interrupt load compare, between a multi-port NIC and the same
number of ports via individual single port NICs?
You don't really have something to compare with. The process is way
different
On 01/01/2006 03:09:03 PM, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:28:42AM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
[...]
Suppose I have 2 firewalls, one failing over to the
other with carp. (net.inet.carp.preempt=1 on
both firewalls.) Each has 3 interfaces, internet,
lan, and dmz. The dmz
The situation is, one of the major peering point on the east coast of
the US, because of pass abuse of less then proper ISP, now required and
register access to the peering point based on mac address and needs to
be register with them, makes it a bit harder to replace your routers
with
On Sunday 01 January 2006 17:12, Dave Feustel wrote:
Is sudden appearance of a skull bones cursor on the
kde desktop associated with any exploits against kde?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
I doubt it. A s/k cursor is likely indicating that something is
broken, wrong or otherwise not right. Why
Stuart Henderson wrote:
The 00:00:5e:xxx MAC used by CARP (and VRRP) is multicast. I don't
think you can change a multicast lladdr to a unicast one.
CARP does use multicast yes, but unless I forgot something, or don't
understand something, there isn't any MAC address that are specifically
Stuart Henderson wrote:
The 00:00:5e:xxx MAC used by CARP (and VRRP) is multicast. I don't
think you can change a multicast lladdr to a unicast one.
Looks like the standard required to use the MAC address for multicast in
the range of:
Multicast MAC addresses use a special 24-bit prefix of
I used to use a switch plugged into my dsl modem to hook up
multiple computers to the internet, but that no longer works,
(no reponse to 2nd computer's dhclient requests through the switch,
although 1st computer's requests are responded to).
So I have plugged my laptop into the 4-port(sis[0-3])
On 01/01/06 23:12, Dave Feustel wrote:
Is sudden appearance of a skull bones cursor on the
kde desktop associated with any exploits against kde?
Hello Dave,
My modest wish concerning misc@ and 2006 is that you will use Google for at
least an hour on all words in any question or reply to
Stuart Henderson wrote:
The 00:00:5e:xxx MAC used by CARP (and VRRP) is multicast. I don't
think you can change a multicast lladdr to a unicast one.
CARP does use multicast yes, but unless I forgot something, or don't
understand something, there isn't any MAC address that are specifically
Multicast MAC addresses use a special 24-bit prefix of 0x0100.5Enn..
which has the lowest bit of the first byte set to '1'.
afaict: CARP traffic itself goes to the group hence 1, whereas traffic to
the shared address is just for an individual member, hence the 0. But I am
no multicast guru.
I have a machine with a sempron64 and it seems that time is a tad bit too
fast. Every minute it skips ahead about 15-20 seconds. After about 10
minutes it's several minutes ahead of the real time. For now I've set a
cron job to rdate time.nist.gov every 5 minutes. This is on OpenBSD 3.8
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Multicast MAC addresses use a special 24-bit prefix of 0x0100.5Enn..
which has the lowest bit of the first byte set to '1'.
afaict: CARP traffic itself goes to the group hence 1, whereas traffic to
the shared address is just for an individual member, hence the 0.
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:38:09PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
I used to use a switch plugged into my dsl modem to hook up
multiple computers to the internet, but that no longer works,
(no reponse to 2nd computer's dhclient requests through the switch,
although 1st computer's requests are
Multicast MAC addresses use a special 24-bit prefix of 0x0100.5Enn..
which has the lowest bit of the first byte set to '1'.
afaict: CARP traffic itself goes to the group hence 1, whereas traffic to
the shared address is just for an individual member, hence the 0. But I am
no multicast
[IMAGE]
Let's keep in touch. Get more from your banking.
Why are you not using your online banking? Your missing out on all the
fantastic services avalible!
--
Dear Bank Of Oklahoma Customer,
We notice that you haven't used
On 01/01/06, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is sudden appearance of a skull bones cursor on the
kde desktop associated with any exploits against kde?
You probably ran xkill by mistake. Not everything is a fucking KDE/X
security hole. Ever considered that your need to constantly flood
--- Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good multi-port NIC card e.g. 4-port, that
works
OK on OpenBSD with a good source supplier.
This question was debated a few times in the archive already. So, far
there isn't one great card that works very well that
gwost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ERROR: File not uploaded, file could not be found or could not be moved:
/var/www/htdocs/torrenti/.torrents/xyxyxyxyx.torrent
Your php application should just know about /htdocs rather than /var/www/htdocs
if the web server is chrooted.
martin wrote:
Just found this.
http://www.routerboard.com/rb44.html
Might just buy one and try it out.
May be good, but the bus is PCI only if I am not mistaken looking at the
spec. Not even PCI Express or PCI X, so it would be interesting to see,
but if you are concern about
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Multicast MAC addresses use a special 24-bit prefix of 0x0100.5Enn..
which has the lowest bit of the first byte set to '1'.
afaict: CARP traffic itself goes to the group hence 1, whereas traffic to
the shared address is just for an individual member, hence the 0. But
Right now I have a FreeBSD Gateway (generic) box and am trying to smoothly
insert an obsd system in it's place.
Lot's of issues, the present system has three nic cards and took a lot of time
-- which now, well I have to do this
right the first time.
Anyone in New England (or especially
Julesg wrote:
And that's my next question:
How good is the obsd port for amd64??
From my own experience on heavy use servers. I can't praise it enough
to give it justice! For the last 18 months, ONLY AMD 64 are coming in
here. No more Intel and still haven't brought in an other Sun yet.
Julesg wrote:
And that's my next question:
How good is the obsd port for amd64??
One more thing if I may. Make sure you get a supported hardware and if
you can find one with AMD chipset on the motherboard, all the better.
Much better and faster then the new one sometime built with the Nvidia
heya,
i've established IPsec connections originating from several windows xp machines
with public IPs to my openbsd firewall that is running isakmpd. they are working
just fine. however, i have a windows machine here at home behind NAT that is
giving me grief when i try to establish an IPsec
I certainly hope that if new ciphers are added to
svnd, that Blowfish is still included. Many of my
previous file systems use Blowfish, and it is my
preferred algorithm.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
After searching through http://openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware and
ath(4), I believe I have a currently (as of the latest snapshot)
unsupported USB 2.0 802.11b/g adapter, the Airlink 101 Super G, based
on the Atheros AR5523. The manufacturer's web site is located at
Jan 1 23:05:16 balrog sm-msp-queue[1531]: k024U2n0023755: timeout
waiting for input from localhost.cimsolve.com during client greeting
Anyone tell me what sm-msp-queue is and what input it is waiting for?
Thanks
Jim
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:00:12AM -0500, NetNeanderthal wrote:
After searching through http://openbsd.org/i386.html#hardware and
ath(4), I believe I have a currently (as of the latest snapshot)
unsupported USB 2.0 802.11b/g adapter, the Airlink 101 Super G, based
on the Atheros AR5523. The
Jim Mays wrote:
Jan 1 23:05:16 balrog sm-msp-queue[1531]: k024U2n0023755: timeout
waiting for input from localhost.cimsolve.com during client greeting
Anyone tell me what sm-msp-queue is and what input it is waiting for?
May be are you using spew or the like as a spam filter and can't
Not that I know of. It is just a firewall with 3.6 installed. There is
nothing else installed on the machine (like a spam filter) unless it is
part of the baseline.
Jim
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jim Mays wrote:
Jan 1 23:05:16 balrog sm-msp-queue[1531]: k024U2n0023755: timeout
waiting for
How do you turn off Sendmail? What starts it in obsd? (Like where is
the equivalent of /etc/rc2.d?
Jim
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jim Mays wrote:
Jan 1 23:05:16 balrog sm-msp-queue[1531]: k024U2n0023755: timeout
waiting for input from localhost.cimsolve.com during client greeting
Anyone tell
Jim Mays wrote:
Not that I know of. It is just a firewall with 3.6 installed. There is
nothing else installed on the machine (like a spam filter) unless it is
part of the baseline.
Then may be your DNS doesn't answer or resolv.conf is wrong?
Any change done in your firewall configuration
man rc.conf
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 11:50:01PM -0600, Jim Mays wrote:
How do you turn off Sendmail? What starts it in obsd? (Like where is
the equivalent of /etc/rc2.d?
Jim
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jim Mays wrote:
Jan 1 23:05:16 balrog sm-msp-queue[1531]: k024U2n0023755: timeout
Hello everybody,
I installed oBSD current for AMD64 on 1.1.2006, created a encrypted
partition for /home and ran into some trouble.
The permissions for /home or /tmp didn't changed:
drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 2 07:59 tmp
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 1 17:11 crypto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I installed oBSD current for AMD64 on 1.1.2006, created a encrypted
partition for /home and ran into some trouble.
The permissions for /home or /tmp didn't changed:
drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 2 07:59 tmp
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I installed oBSD current for AMD64 on 1.1.2006, created a encrypted
partition for /home and ran into some trouble.
The permissions for /home or /tmp didn't changed:
drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 2 07:59 tmp
60 matches
Mail list logo
