Hi All,
I've put in a few hours of effort, and I've been unable to get my Linksys
WAG54G DSL router/wireless/VPN thinger (running Linux FreeS/WAN apparently)
to talk to my OpenBSD 3.5 system via IPSec. I've tried both automatic and
manual keying, to no avail.. I believe there are several models
Sure OpenBSD's modified Apache 1.3 is way more secure than most stuff
out there, and is working great.
However, the Subversion versioning control system (which my project
uses) demands Apache2 in order to do DAV checkouts and commits, better
authentication and more. So, my only choice was
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:33:19PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3), but not until
ddb has proper name demangling code.
*rolls eyes*
Yuck.
Miod
Kind
Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it
hi, have you guys met this problem? I use the recent code from CVS.
Thanks.
$ config -s /sys -b. GENERIC
$ make depend
[snip]
...
depending the kern library objects
depending the compat library objects
sh /sys/kern/genassym.sh cc -Werror -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes
Hello!
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:28:07PM +0800, Dasn Clainst wrote:
hi, have you guys met this problem? I use the recent code from CVS.
Thanks.
$ config -s /sys -b. GENERIC
$ make depend
[snip]
...
[...]
/sys/sys/systm.h:170: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
`vsnprintf'
[...]
Srebrenko,
What firmware are you using on your controller?
Jason
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable
performance problems went away with some important patches since the
release.
I bet you'll see the load go away. And yes,
The latest, which is, AFAIK, 2.58.
On 2/8/06, Jason Houx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Srebrenko,
What firmware are you using on your controller?
Jason
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
You can also try to update to -rOPENBSD_3_8. All noticeable
performance problems went away with
On 08/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
has good support
for
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Christopher Vance
I have a network being installed with a pair of 3.8 firewalls running
carp for failover. Temporarily, their external connection is via
residential grade router and wireless ADSL modem, with the router
doing pppoe. A real network
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:01:38 -0800
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/06, Antonios Anastasiadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been wondering what are the openbsd team's long term-plans (if
any at all,of course) regarding future smp support.
I am aware that openbsd currently
On 2/8/06, Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cast a vote for re-writing the kernel in Ruby because of it's robust
threads implementation.
No no no, OpenBSD should be rewritten with the new GPL v3 as soon
as it stabilizes. It seems much more robust than the previous releases,
and it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Feb 7 Joe S spake forth boldly:
Denny White wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today Stuart Henderson spake forth boldly:
On 2006/02/04 20:43, Denny White wrote:
hw.sensors.11=lm0, Temp3, temp, 127.50 degC / 261.50 degF
Being a genuine novice wrt OpenBSD, I am not overly qualified to pass
judgement here. However, I read pretty much everything that is posted
to misc@ and have read every one of Dave's troll-like rants, for the
last couple of months. Sorry Dave, but from here you appear to be either
a troll, an M$
Hi,
I'm noticing quite a few sanity messages on the ports tree (notably sdl is
one of them) when running make on a Zaurus.
The messages pop up in the configure stage and state that the binary
produced is older than the distribution. Are we interested in these
messages? Seems like there
At 06:40 PM 2/7/06, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it has good support
for threads.
Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3), but not
Hello,
On a PC running only SSH server to a very limited number of people, and only
ipv4
I ran tcpdump and got the below:
19:29:58.871915 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c ff02::1:ff00:10: icmp6: neighbor
sol: who has a.dns.br
19:29:58.911884 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c ff02::1:ff00:13: icmp6: neighbor
On 2/7/06, Marcin Wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why change that
It is apache, but with some pathes. But still iti s apache (changing
name may be bad for futurre coders, that wouldl ike to make somep
lugin for OpenBSD http server, before they will start to make it,
theyw ill have to learn,
Well then, I'll take a look at you suggestion, Joachim, seems reasonable.
Too bad most developers actually *prefer* FTP over ssh, so it's going to be
difficult to convince them. Well, looks like I'll just have to implement...
they'll
get used to it anyway =)
Talking about the Apache2 port, as
Hi everybody,
The problem is not directly with obsd installed on scsi disk (fujitsu,
mas3735np, 73.4gb, 15,000rpm). Initially, the only system installed on it
was Win XP Pro, but it was infected and I installed obsd 3.6 over it, also
as a single OS on the whole disk, with the only purpose -
Felipe Scarel wrote:
Well then, I'll take a look at you suggestion, Joachim, seems reasonable.
Too bad most developers actually *prefer* FTP over ssh, so it's going to be
difficult to convince them. Well, looks like I'll just have to implement...
they'll
get used to it anyway =)
Talking about
Thanks there, I'll consider using lighttpd then.
On 2/8/06, Bret Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Felipe Scarel wrote:
Well then, I'll take a look at you suggestion, Joachim, seems
reasonable.
Too bad most developers actually *prefer* FTP over ssh, so it's going to
be
difficult to
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:09:14 -0500, Jason Crawford proclaimed...
I think the biggest argument for changing the web server is the fact
that the Apache in tree doesn't do IPv6, and Apache 2.x does. And,
btw, if you look at early 2.0 releases, you'll see they are still
under the Apache 1.1
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 17:46:58 +0200, Kim Onnel proclaimed...
I ran tcpdump and got the below:
19:29:58.871915 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c ff02::1:ff00:10: icmp6: neighbor
sol: who has a.dns.br
19:29:58.911884 fe80::20c:76ff:fe98:e72c ff02::1:ff00:13: icmp6: neighbor
sol: who has
On 2/8/06, Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/7/06, Marcin Wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why change that
It is apache, but with some pathes. But still iti s apache (changing
name may be bad for futurre coders, that wouldl ike to make somep
lugin for OpenBSD http server, before
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
So the language should be VHDL!
+++chefren
On Wednesday, February 8, Jack Culpepper wrote:
Encryption Key: 123456789012345678901234
Authentication Key: 12345678901234567890
So then on the OpenBSD end, those correspond to:
Encryption Key: 3132333435363738393a3132333435363738393a31323334
Authentication Key:
On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
So the language should be VHDL!
Ugh! That's akin to using C++ and C# at the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks,
I've got an ADSL connection and for the past few months
have been working out an ALTQ (well pf.conf) config to
allow me to manage my upstream b/w. Sometimes the behaviour
I'm seeing doesn't jibe with how I'd expect it to work and
I'm
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
So the language should be VHDL!
+++chefren
Just write the OS in SQL PL and move on! Geeeze ..
i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
http://user.it.uu.se/~arnea/abs/simp.html.
I could not figure what would it be the best/average/worst cost, i.e.,
O(f(n)) for those method above.
Thanks a lot for
It's been a while since I've had the opportunity to code in RPG.
Implementing an SMP kernel in an old IBM report generating language is
an interesting challenge, and would open up the possibility of running
OpenBSD 4.0 on card-sorting machines.
On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:35:30 -0700
Tobias Weingartner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
2006/2/8, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
http://user.it.uu.se/~arnea/abs/simp.html.
I could not figure what
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
So the language should be
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 01:46:19PM +0100, Alexandre Anriot wrote:
Hello,
sometimes when i type a key under x, it gets repeated and repeated and
so on. Sometimes i can stop this repeating by pressing the key again.
But then there will be another key that gets repeated in the next
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 11:42:10AM -0800, Don Smith wrote:
how could 1024 bits be used in blowfish only accepts
448 bit keys?
They can't be used - i was wrong, sorry.
--
| /\ ASCII Ribbon | Jonathan Glaschke - Lorenz-Goertz-Stra_e 71,
| \ / Campaign Against | 41238 Moenchengladbach,
On 02/08/06 21:48, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Wednesday, February 8, chefren wrote:
On 02/08/06 14:56, Nickolay A Burkov wrote:
Weee! I think OpenBSD kernel should be implemented in hardware part!
Of course, big gate array and stellar performance.
On 2/8/06, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to know which would it be the best choice, and why?
For instance, i don't know the best/average/worst case for the method
supplied.
I don't have a simple source of reference where i could see these
metrics, prefereable on the
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:47:15PM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
2006/2/8, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:51:31PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
digressed a bit (I'm sure that surprises everyone here that I'd do
that),
Shocked!
Anyway, to folks who are wondering about SMP, all you have to do is
notice how little traffic there is on smp@ and how (relatively) few
commits there
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, chefren wrote:
and I know just the card to do it,
http://www.metanetworks.org/products.html
No no no, those cards have not enough memory shameless plug we
manufacture one with up to 2x 256MB SDRAM with fully independent
address and data busses:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:21:19 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
Can you do line rate 10G/OC192 with your card?
Last I heard only Endace could; and they're not supported.
Now I don't feel at all bad about not being able to run bsd.mp on my
clunky old dual-266 Dell PowerEdge 4200. Pah! Programmers nowadays, no
idea of commitment! ;)
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 22:36 -0600, Benjamin Collins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 08:51:31PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
digressed
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:21:19 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
Can you do line rate 10G/OC192 with your card?
Last I heard only Endace could; and they're not supported.
the metanetworks 10G can
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:04:22 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
the metanetworks 10G can
Hmm, no kidding. Do you know of anything that is rather lossless just for 1G
networks (optical)? We may be throwing some taps out and the usually intel
cards are very lossy.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 16:04:22 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
the metanetworks 10G can
Hmm, no kidding. Do you know of anything that is rather lossless just for 1G
networks (optical)? We may be throwing some taps out and the usually intel
cards are very
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
SNIP
Hmm, no kidding. Do you know of anything that is rather lossless just for 1G
networks (optical)? We may be throwing some taps out and the usually intel
cards are very lossy.
Oops, I just re-read your original post. They have a new 1G card with
Don't get me wrong, i am very confident with openbsd.
Although i am very confident using the openbsd native support for my
needs, all of them have some thing i dislike.
First: i would really enjoy worst case O(log2 n), none of the method i
know so far make such garantee. Another problem is about
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 09:34:02PM -0200, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Don't get me wrong, i am very confident with openbsd.
Although i am very confident using the openbsd native support for my
needs, all of them have some thing i dislike.
First: i would really enjoy worst case O(log2 n), none of
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
[...]
/sys/sys/systm.h:170: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
`vsnprintf'
[...]
Have you properly updated gcc?
IIRC there have been quite some changes wrt types and in the
instructions for builds from
I still haven't seen a DMESG for the IBM e326m SCSI version as well as
using the RAID 1. Can anyone confirm or deny if it is supported and
works well on the current version?
I know all issues known for the e326m SATA version are out of the way,
but I don't know yet about the SCSI version.
On 02/09/06 00:04, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, eric wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:21:19 -0700, Diana Eichert proclaimed...
Can you do line rate 10G/OC192 with your card?
Last I heard only Endace could; and they're not supported.
the metanetworks 10G can
Since also OC192
Can anyone tell me how to install gforth on OpenBSD 3.8. I tried
./configure, make, make check at this is some of what I got:
cd engine make gforth gforth-ditc gforth-fast gforth-itc
`gforth' is up to date.
`gforth-ditc' is up to date.
`gforth-fast' is up to date.
`gforth-itc' is up to date.
Credit Union of TexasCredit Union of Texas
Dear Credit Union Of Texas Client,
This is your official notification from Credit Union Of Texas that the
service(s) listed below
will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous
notifications have
been sent to the Billing Contact
Message
Management and Decision Making
February 26-March 2,2006
Held at Sheraton Jumeira Beach - Dubai
INTRODUCTION
Seriously, are you trolling intentionally? From what I can tell,
nobody else has reported anything similar to your security holes and
you have only presented symptoms without proof of a real exploit.
Perhaps you did get rooted, but as you appear to be the only one
experiencing it, without more
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:59:17PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
[...]
/sys/sys/systm.h:170: warning: conflicting types for built-in function
`vsnprintf'
[...]
Have you properly updated gcc?
IIRC there have been quite some changes wrt types and in the
instructions for builds from
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, chefren wrote:
SNIP
Lets put in the OpenBSD plug first: Yes OpenBSD is fully supported with the
FT-x
card.
The Metanetworks 10G card is supported by an OpenBSD driver. The only
OpenBSD version directly supported is 3.7, it was the current version when
we purchased it.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
2006/2/8, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
i saw openbsd uses red-black trees inside. I could not figure it out a
motivation for not using AVL, SPL or even something based on
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Don't get me wrong, i am very confident with openbsd.
Although i am very confident using the openbsd native support for my
needs, all of them have some thing i dislike.
First: i would really enjoy worst case O(log2 n), none of the method i
know so
61 matches
Mail list logo
