On 7/5/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 06 July 2006 01:35, c.s.r.c.murthy wrote:
block all in pf.conf is ok, but it will go away when the rules are
flushed for known/unknown reasons. I feel it is desirable to have a
kernel parameter that does default blocking when all
c.s.r.c.murthy wrote:
Hello Matthew,
block all in pf.conf is ok, but it will go away when the rules are
flushed for known/unknown reasons. I feel it is desirable to have a
kernel parameter that does default blocking when all rules are flushed.
But the default blocking will go away when the
thats what i was asking, can i just install a small set of libs or do
i need to entirely install X
On 7/4/06, Peter Blair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have no parts of X installed, then how do you expect to link
against it? If you plan to use your OpenBSD machine as a headless X
client,
Ok, finally got Chillispot to run on OpenBSD, NetBSD Mac OS X :)
http://www.geeklan.co.uk/?p=72
http://www.geeklan.co.uk/files/chillispot-1.0.patch
Patch chillispot run make install chilli_LDFLAGS=-lcrypto
Unfortunately I haven't written a sample PF config yet, but if you have
a look in doc
Hello.
On my laptop I use trunk(4) failover to switch between wired and
wireless networks. It works great. But I think my solution for
the router is a bit dirty. Is there a better way?
The router has one interface connected to the internet (fxp0)
and two interfaces for the internal network (ral0
On 7/4/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:07:37AM -0700, Ginja_Ninja wrote:
3. Ultra secure remote login away from home on the laptop.
Run it over IPsec, or OpenVPN if you want to be able to pass broken
firewalls. (Note - setting up IPsec on OpenBSD is
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:36:44AM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
#pftcl -f all echo block all | pfctl -f -
then the switch over to the new ruleset is pretty snappy and hardly
enough time for any malicious packets to get through.
Flushing the ruleset is totally unneccessary when loading a new
Hey folks just thought I'd UPGRADE to a newer snapshot tonight and now
I can't seem to get my re0 network interface to ping (from either
the client or from OpenBSD) and/or packet forwarding via PF - although
oddly I seems to be able to get receive dhcp queries from it and get a
MAC address (but
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:03:35AM -0700, Lawrence Horvath wrote:
thats what i was asking, can i just install a small set of libs or do
i need to entirely install X
xbase will do for (almost?) all ports.
Joachim
Jan Johansson skrev:
Hello.
On my laptop I use trunk(4) failover to switch between wired and
wireless networks. It works great. But I think my solution for
the router is a bit dirty. Is there a better way?
The router has one interface connected to the internet (fxp0)
and two interfaces for the
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 10:07:53PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 08:45, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:22:59PM -0700, Jeff Simmons wrote:
Well, just to play the devil's advocate here ...
One of the main functions of any password hygiene program
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 18:48:28 +0200, Joachim Schipper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:16:45PM -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
On 7/4/06, Peter Blair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/29/06, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a call this afternoon from Tom Moore to let
kami petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of
the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself.
but you don't say exactly where you are unsuccessful...
It works, I just thought there might be a cleaner solution.
* Giancarlo Razzolini [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-04 16:07]:
My question is not only about ftp-proxy, i only used it to exemplify. My
question is: if i tag a packet that is entering one interface and in the
same rule (rdr pass, for example) i send this packet to an interface
which is skipped by
* Andrea Cocito [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-04 13:02]:
Looking at the rationale behind that code I found interesting that it
does
something very similar to what we do here with a shell script: if the
main
router has one or more sessions down widthdraw its precedence on
CARP interfaces.
* c.s.r.c.murthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-05 07:25]:
block all in pf.conf is ok, but it will go away when the rules are
flushed for known/unknown reasons. I feel it is desirable to have a
kernel parameter that does default blocking when all rules are flushed.
then certainly you want
Jan Johansson skrev:
kami petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of
the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself.
but you don't say exactly where you are unsuccessful...
It works, I just thought there might
Ya, that'd be nice if I ever made it to a prompt to enter 'anonymous',
but the connection fails well before that point.
$ ping ftp.hifn.com
PING ftp.hifn.com (208.10.194.169): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.10.194.169: icmp_seq=0 ttl=117 time=100.851 ms
64 bytes from 208.10.194.169: icmp_seq=1
sonjaya wrote:
How to blok ddos/Flooding/ssh brute attack with pf .
Thanks to ( max-src-nodes 20, max-src-states 1 ) brute forcing just
disappeared.
Stephan
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.asc]
I just updated from CVS today and cannot do a make build anymore.
I successfully installed a booted a GENERIC kernel.
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #3: Wed Jul 5 09:38:20 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium III (GenuineIntel 686-class) 602
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 03:35:40PM +0200, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
I just updated from CVS today and cannot do a make build anymore.
I successfully installed a booted a GENERIC kernel.
OpenBSD 3.9-current (GENERIC) #3: Wed Jul 5 09:38:20 CEST 2006
[EMAIL
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:24:34PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Consider five lower-case words chosen from 1024 possibilities each, for
instance - this has 50 bits of entropy, roughly equivalent to a
10-character password based on natural language [1]; a little fuzzing
and use of capitals
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Seems like your kernel is older than your userland; adjfreq is a rather
recent addition.
That is not the problem. The problem is that libc is too old.
adjfreq() is a new syscall, and as such needs a stub, which is in libc.
-Otto
Are you
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 16:41 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
You probably did not do a make build, but took a shortcut.
No at all.
I've followed precisely the procedure described here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
as I've always done before, I forgot to mention that the machine was a
**
送信したメールからウィルスが検出されました。
日時：07/05/06 22:18:44
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ウイルス名：W32/MyDoom-O
アクション：削除
**
The virus was detected from the received mail.
DATE: 07/05/06 22:18:44
From:
Hello,
(using latest current)
I'm using pan 0.14.2 (nntp client). When I try to update the cache of my
subscribed newsgroups the application crashes with the following message:
GLib-ERROR **: gmem.c:135: failed to allocate 86749427 bytes
aborting...
Abort trap (core dumped)
I'm not a
Firstly thanks for everyone thought on this.
As i say, i am in new waters with this, so getting my head around it all
will take to reading and re-reading.
For reference though, i intend to run a nano-itx system with a SATA drive.
I have taken serious consideration to you suggestion of a
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 16:41 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
You probably did not do a make build, but took a shortcut.
No at all.
I've followed precisely the procedure described here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html
as I've always done
Do you see anything unusual in the dmesg?
-p.
Federico Giannici wrote:
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:25:41PM +0200, Federico Giannici wrote:
Yesterday another PC freezed!
It just crashed again!
did it freeze or did it crash?
I wrote it into the first email: it freezes with no error at all, no
network, only
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 17:38 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
What is the version of your libc? Check ls -l /usr/lib/libc.so.*,
newest version should be 39.2.
$ nm /usr/lib/libc.so.39.2 | grep adjfreq
000411f0 T _thread_sys_adjfreq
000411f0 W adjfreq
I'm building right now on the second box
On 2006/07/05 18:14, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
And if i understand correctly it's right to have that value before the
build, i just have to have 39.2 after a successful build, right?
No, you get 39.2 from an up-to-date snapshot base39.tgz.
sthen:2$ tar tzf
Pedro Martelletto wrote:
Do you see anything unusual in the dmesg?
I cannot see anything strange.
Anyway, here it is the dmesg of the web server.
The mail server have the same hardware, but started freezing since we
installed an X2 CPU and upgraded to 3.9 (MP).
I don't know if the freezes
Hi,
the dovecot ports pkg is a bit 'old' but would it make sense to istall this and
then make a second installation from the current source? Does the port package
come with any specific to OBSD conf files or should I go directly with the
source?
Thanks
George
Matthew Closson wrote:
In setting up about 30 ISPEC tunnels on an OpenBSD box in the past 6
months I had this issue come up with about 4 of the remote peers.
Typically it is one of two problems.
1. They have a made a policy level decision somewhere and say they will
only route traffic to
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:26:45AM -0700, Ginja_Ninja wrote:
Firstly thanks for everyone thought on this.
As i say, i am in new waters with this, so getting my head around it all
will take to reading and re-reading.
For reference though, i intend to run a nano-itx system with a SATA
Hi guys,
ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original version on the system
did not have it? (I listened to way too much bad advice setting this system up
with my co-worker, now I have to fix it)
--Rob
-
Eirik Goransson / Rob Baldassano
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
-Stephen-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original
version on the system did not have it? (I listened to way too
much bad advice setting this system up with my co-worker, now
I have to fix it)
No. The only thing it does is unpack a distribution set (a bunch
Hi,
Is the Intel PRO/1000 PT still non-functional under our favorite OS?
I searced around and found a message from Darrian Hale in late April
that said he was having kernel panics with this NIC. Has anything
changed?
I have some Sun X2100s that I want to use as routers and the only
missing bit
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Why the CF? It's slow, and relatively expensive. It's good for embedded
systems, but if you already have a huge disk, use that.
h I can see your point. Its only a thought at the moment but the reason
i am looking in this direction is:
If the OS is seperated from
tcpdump -entttv -i enc0
Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
-Stephen-
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:10:43AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
-Stephen-
$ man enc
The enc interface allows an administrator to see outgoing packets before
they have been processed by ipsec(4), or incoming packets after they have
been similarly processed, via
Marcus Glocker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:10:43AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
-Stephen-
$ man enc
The enc interface allows an administrator to see outgoing packets before
they have been processed by ipsec(4), or incoming packets after they have
been
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
-Otto
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
Please don't get me started. I have been working on this problem with
precious little assistance from folks like you for over a week now, and
I've read
Christopher Snell wrote:
Hi,
Is the Intel PRO/1000 PT still non-functional under our favorite OS?
I searced around and found a message from Darrian Hale in late April
that said he was having kernel panics with this NIC. Has anything
changed?
# dmesg
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC.MP) #736: Thu Mar 2
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 08:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
Rob Baldassano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original version on
the system did not have it? (I listened to way too much bad advice
setting this system up with my co-worker, now I have to fix it)
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
And for the record -- since some people found that question beyond the
pale -- I have been tcpdumping enc0 all morning and I am seeing no
traffic, inspite
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:15:53AM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ANy issue with adding X to an upgrade when the original
version on the system did not have it? (I listened to way too
much bad advice setting this system up with my co-worker, now
I have
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 17:38 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
What is the version of your libc? Check ls -l /usr/lib/libc.so.*,
newest version should be 39.2.
$ nm /usr/lib/libc.so.39.2 | grep adjfreq
000411f0 T _thread_sys_adjfreq
000411f0 W
On Jul 5, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Marcus Glocker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:10:43AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
-Stephen-
$ man enc
The enc interface allows an administrator to see outgoing packets
before
they have been processed by
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:10:43AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
-Stephen-
yes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1$ sudo tcpdump -n -i enc0
Password:
tcpdump: WARNING: enc0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: listening on enc0, link-type ENC
19:32:49.036465
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:30:54AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
I am not seeing any traffic on enc0 when using tcpdump, that is why I
asked.
Are you sure IPsec is being used? Can you see IPsec-processed traffic
on the physical interface?
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
And for the record -- since some people found that question beyond the
pale -- I have been tcpdumping
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 01:36:40PM -0400, I wrote:
In addition, you might need machdep.allowaperture=2, per /etc/X11R6/README.
A fairly obvious typo. It should be per /usr/X11R6/README.
Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is why I bought this card ;) Should I shutup and upgrade to -current and/or
will G band
be supported (maybe 4.0) ?
ath0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 Atheros AR5212 rev 0x01: irq 11
ath0: AR5213 5.9 phy 4.3 rf5112 3.6, FCC2A*, address 00:0b:6b:37:29:87
Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:30:54AM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
I am not seeing any traffic on enc0 when using tcpdump, that is why I
asked.
Are you sure IPsec is being used? Can you see IPsec-processed traffic
on the physical interface?
Aye, I have other
so how do you install that, i was thinking it would just be
# pkg_add /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Can't resolve /home/music/xbase39.tgz
but that didnt work, how do you install that package?
On 7/5/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:03:35AM -0700, Lawrence
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
And for the record -- since some people found that question
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:09:49PM -0600, Stephen Bosch wrote:
| Otto Moerbeek wrote:
| On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
|
| Does tcpdump work on enc0?
|
| Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
|
| And for the record -- since some people found that question beyond the
| pale
On 7/5/06, Stephen Bosch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Did you ifconfig enc0 up
--
GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 11:42:22 -0700, Lawrence Horvath wrote...
so how do you install that, i was thinking it would just be
# pkg_add /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Can't resolve /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Get the tarballs from a mirror, then...
$ su - root
# cd /
# tar zxpvf /path/to/xbase39.tgz
On 7/4/06, Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having the panic problem reported by others on stable and saw a post
by Reyk
that it's fixed in -current. That's awesome, thanks for the fix...but I also
wanted to
ask if there's work towards getting G band working in the ath driver,
Hey Lawrence,
# pkg_add /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Can't resolve /home/music/xbase39.tgz
but that didnt work, how do you install that package?
cd /
tar zxpf /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Read http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade39.html.
HTH... Nico
Lawrence Horvath wrote:
so how do you install that, i was thinking it would just be
# pkg_add /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Can't resolve /home/music/xbase39.tgz
gunzip, tar.
--
Adam PAPAI
D i g i t a l Influence
http://www.digitalinfluence.hu
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +36 30 33-55-735
The file sets that are used to install OpenBSD are not packages even
though they end in the tgz extension. Thus, pkg_add doesn't know what
to do with it. Try a command like this instead:
# cd /
# tar -xvpzf /home/music/xbase39.tgz
The -v is optional, but make sure you include -p to
Hi, everybody:
First -- thanks to everyone who tried to help me out on this one. It is
most appreciated. I apologise if my questions or responses rubbed anyone
the wrong way. It wasn't intended.
I want to recap the situation because I think that, indeed, what I want
to do can't be done.
I have
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so how do you install that, i was thinking it would just be
# pkg_add /home/music/xbase39.tgz
Can't resolve /home/music/xbase39.tgz
but that didnt work, how do you install that package?
You start with the FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#AddFileSet
DS
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:13, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
It *is*. I've done so since a nearly uncountable number of years.
Something like this in /etc/fstab helps.
/dev/wd0b /tmpmfs rw,-m0,-s204800 0 0
In the past i've always symlinked /tmp to point to /var/tmp.
Hi,
I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and
I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
enabled by default.
In order not to spread (or consume) FUD, I would like to know if soft
updates are considered reliable and in which situations,
As anyone seen this? No matter what I do I cant stop this from
happing. I am at the point of being forced to use another OS that I
DONT want to use. Any help would be very much appreciated.
As a workaround you could disable ichiic in the kernel config. Use
man config for hints on how to
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and
I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
enabled by default.
In order not to spread (or consume) FUD, I would like to
I am using OpenBSD 3.9 using a Compaq M2105US Laptop with no problems
and xorgcfg created a config that supports my touch pad but there is an
annoying tap to click issue that I would like to turn off.
Thank you for your time.
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 06:37:56PM +0200, FTP wrote:
Hi,
the dovecot ports pkg is a bit 'old' but would it make sense to istall this
and then make a second installation from the current source? Does the port
package come with any specific to OBSD conf files or should I go directly
with
On 2006/07/05 23:19, Alexander Hall wrote:
I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
enabled by default.
Here's one reason you might sometimes not want it: space of
deleted files isn't recovered until the delayed updates have
been written out. This is particularly
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:23:57AM -0700, Ginja_Ninja wrote:
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Why the CF? It's slow, and relatively expensive. It's good for embedded
systems, but if you already have a huge disk, use that.
h I can see your point. Its only a thought at the moment but the
Hi,
I'm about to deploy OpenOSPFD in a live environment and my question
goes out to those who have used(or are using) OpenOSPFD that shipped
with 3.9. It has been running it a lab enviroment for quite some time
with only minor issues.
Are there any known issues regarding the version of OpenOSPFD
Josh Grosse wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and
I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
enabled by default.
In order not to spread (or consume) FUD, I
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/07/05 23:19, Alexander Hall wrote:
I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not
enabled by default.
Here's one reason you might sometimes not want it: space of
deleted files isn't recovered until the delayed updates have
been written
After the heat I took trying to upgrade from 3.7 to 3.8 via source recompile,
I took the advice to heart to simply untar some binaries right over the top of
my running system, which seemed a lot more scary to me.
However, I'm happy to report that my system is now running 3.9 with little if
any
On 2006/07/06 00:13, Joachim Schipper wrote:
The OS shouldn't use the disk much, but adding CF will make your server
more complex, more expensive, and slower. I really don't see the point.
OTOH, if files on the HD are only accessed infrequently and the disk
is spun down the rest of the time,
Hi
I'm in the process of building firewall (Obviously it will run
OpenBSD) and I need to put in a quad NIC card. There's Intel Quad card
that I had a success with in the past but is expensive as hell. I found
a company called Mikrotik that makes a Quad NIC card and I'm looking for
Consider using this script the next time:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/OpenBSD-binary-upgrade/
# Han
Chris Cappuccio([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 12:03:35PM -0700:
Allie Daneman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is why I bought this card ;) Should I shutup and upgrade to -current and/or
will G band
be supported (maybe 4.0) ?
ath0 at pci0 dev 15 function 0 Atheros AR5212 rev 0x01:
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I'm in the process of building firewall (Obviously it will run OpenBSD)
and I need to put in a quad NIC card. There's Intel Quad card that I had
a success with in the past but is expensive as hell. I found a company
called Mikrotik that makes a Quad NIC card and I'm
Hello lists! (sorry if cross-list posting is frowned upon)
I'm setting up a BSD/pf machine that will be working as a binat
firewall for a number of hosts on two /28 subnets belonging to the
same co-location provider.
The BSD machine is already live, working hard for one subnet, and I
don't have
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 18:35:58 -0700, Allie Daneman wrote:
if not, then there is more reverse engineering to be done, but it's very
slow and painstaking work.
I bet...you have any recommendations for Soekris/OpenBSD friendly G band
MiniPCI cards ? Man I just bought another ath card too...it may
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 stable, arch i386. Also
autoconf-2.59. I'd install the nmap package, but
it's an older version.
When I run ./configure --with-openssl=/usr/sbin/ I get a
number of warnings like the following:
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure:
89 matches
Mail list logo
