2007/2/26, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2/26/07, Samuel Moqux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having some issues with an ipsec connection with vpnc (isakmp is
not an option, since does not support xauth, and I don't control the
other end) from an OpenBSD firewall/router to a Cisco
I am trying to understand or see if there would be differences between
using OpenBSD for routing in a setup where the routing is done between
two VLan's for example oppose to between to physical network cards.
Any impact on the pps capability between the two?
Internally to the server/router,
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 08:58]:
I am trying to understand or see if there would be differences between
using OpenBSD for routing in a setup where the routing is done between
two VLan's for example oppose to between to physical network cards.
Any impact on the pps
On 2/26/07, Default User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long,
and just tracking RELEASE means running an insecure system.
Binary updating - try it, you'll like it!
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 08:58]:
I am trying to understand or see if there would be differences between
using OpenBSD for routing in a setup where the routing is done between
two VLan's for example oppose to between to physical network cards.
Any
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 09:37]:
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 08:58]:
I am trying to understand or see if there would be differences between
using OpenBSD for routing in a setup where the routing is done between
two VLan's for
Henning Brauer wrote:
use better network cards, or start hacking :)
For the card, I sure know, but it's stat to be pretty darn expensive to
test what's on the market and new one as well. I fell sometime it would
be less expensive to have a custom one design using FPGA or something!
As for
actually i just need ssh kerberos authentication
but the problem is that using ssh kerberos authentication I got an error
upon autghentication
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 krb5: verify: Server not found in Kerberos
database
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 sshd[15347]: Failed password for riccardo
www.Transylvania-calling.com
You should be able to run OSPF over gif(4), I don't think you can
run it over gre(4) on OpenBSD at the moment.
Yes you can. Multicast over gre(4) works since 4.0 IIRC.
ciao,
chakl
# ntop -i bridge0
bridge0: no IPv4 address assigned
Unless I am misunderstanding the concept of a bridge, I don't think a
bridge can even have an IP address. Any ideas?
A bridge *interface* can have an IP address, though that's not a common
configuration. Try assigning an address to one
I debugged further with a recent OpenBSD 4.1 snapshot and can
claim the following:
- plain Xorg vesa drivers don't support widescreen formats
(16:9 and 16:10 formats are discussed to be supported _maybe_
in future VESA specs - so people who claim that
Xorg's vesa driver works with a
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:23:40PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Default User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long,
and just tracking RELEASE means
# ntop -i bridge0
bridge0: no IPv4 address assigned
and it stops running... try darkstat but read on.
Unless I am misunderstanding the concept of a bridge, I don't think a
bridge can even have an IP address. Any ideas?
A bridge *interface* can have an IP address,
to clarify - an
The main reason we don't have binary stable updates is that no-one we
trust has the time to build them. It means maintaining an extra machine
that would only track stable, do builds, do the equivalent of releases.
One release every six months is a lot of work already.
If people want to provide
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:10:05AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
use better network cards, or start hacking :)
For the card, I sure know, but it's stat to be pretty darn expensive to
test what's on the market and new one as well. I fell sometime it would
be less
Hi.
Does anyone have a problem with the latest macppc snapshot?
Booting the cd41.iso, it loops with:
init: single user shell terminated, restarting
If you upgrade by extracting the sets, when restarting, you get:
init: /bin/dh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode
Enter
Hi.
I do. I just tried to update my macppc to latest snapshot
and start getting this messages.
Pedro
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone have a problem with the latest macppc snapshot?
Booting the cd41.iso, it loops with:
init: single user shell terminated, restarting
If you upgrade
fwiw, one piece of fallout from listing the same address on a loopback
interface as a real iface is that ntpd 'listen on *' tries to listen to
the same address twice and fails, so you need to list the addresses
individually in ntpd.conf.
(other than that, I haven't seen any major problems, but
Does anyone have a problem with the latest macppc snapshot?
Booting the cd41.iso, it loops with:
init: single user shell terminated, restarting
My fault. This will be fixed in the next snapshot.
Miod
# tcpdump -e -ttt -n -i pflog0
tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file), capture size 96 bytes
00 rule 4294967295/unkn(8): pass in on bge0:
Hi,
I've got now a openBSD kernel with USB
I would like to see all debug
(printf in code)
I compile with option USB_debug but i have not get more
message
what have I to do?
thanks
___
Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir
Any chance this is supported by one of the existing driver, but just
needs the ID to be added?
port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 94 mA, config 1, USB Serial
Adaptor(0x0080), Palm Computing, Inc.(0x0830), rev 1.00
On 2/27/07, RJ45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually i just need ssh kerberos authentication
but the problem is that using ssh kerberos authentication I got an error
upon autghentication
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 krb5: verify: Server not found in Kerberos
database
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1
* RJ45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 02:40]:
actually i just need ssh kerberos authentication
but the problem is that using ssh kerberos authentication I got an error
upon autghentication
Feb 26 21:42:54 bastionbox1 krb5: verify: Server not found in Kerberos
database
Feb 26 21:42:54
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:30:33AM -0500, Wade, Daniel wrote:
Any chance this is supported by one of the existing driver, but just
needs the ID to be added?
port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 94 mA, config 1, USB Serial
Adaptor(0x0080), Palm Computing, Inc.(0x0830), rev 1.00
Looks like it's
On 2/27/07, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you send your pf.conf entirely?
On 2/27/07, Frans Haarman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# tcpdump -e -ttt -n -i pflog0
tcpdump: WARNING: pflog0: no IPv4 address assigned
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
On 2007/02/27 08:50, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:30:33AM -0500, Wade, Daniel wrote:
Any chance this is supported by one of the existing driver, but just
needs the ID to be added?
port 2 addr 2: full speed, power 94 mA, config 1, USB Serial
Adaptor(0x0080), Palm
Last year, I switched to OpenBSD 4.0 (from FreeBSD) and noticed a
decrease of
the *heard* sound quality when playing the same files. It sounds like a
lower
bit rate (imagine a 96 kbit/s mp3 at higher volumes for example), but I
can't
pinpoint it, though.
My friends told me to fiddle with
-Original Message-
From: Darrin Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:50 AM
To: Wade, Daniel
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Unsupported USB - Serial Adapter
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:30:33AM -0500, Wade, Daniel wrote:
Any chance this is
Hello misc@,
[sorry this got much longer than I wanted it to]
I'm pretty sure many other people have already thought about, or even
used this, for faster compilation of kernels:
distcc
I wanted to wait with this message until I have everything together
concerning patches for distcc integration
After consideration and due to weird
problems afore discussed, I will likely be
upgrading an openbsd 4.0 i386 server to
an openbsd 4.0 amd64.
Yes in retrospect I should have used the
amd64 build not the i386 build on an athlon64
cpu... But I now have a 'production '
cyrus-imapd/sendmail server
On 2007/02/27 17:03, Paul Pruett wrote:
After consideration and due to weird
problems afore discussed, I will likely be
upgrading an openbsd 4.0 i386 server to
an openbsd 4.0 amd64.
A new i386 snapshot is very likely to fix this.
I have upgraded version on i386 and on amd64,
but never same
f2k7 is not in 2 weeks but from 10th to 15th April and this still does
not help with DISKSPACE and SERVERS to plug them in.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:48:03PM +0100, Martin Reindl wrote:
f2k7 is not in 2 weeks but from 10th to 15th April and this still does
not help with DISKSPACE and SERVERS to plug them in.
Well, April, not March, doh!
Okay so there will be some more time to make this work :)
But to quote from
This question may be more appropriate for tech@ but i thought i'd try
here first just in case.
lets say i have a bunch of #defines, for example (from
sys/dev/wscons/wsconsio.h):
/* Event type definitions. Comment for each is information in value. */
#define WSCONS_EVENT_KEY_UP 1
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Marco Pfatschbacher wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 06:10:43PM +0100, Stefan Kell wrote:
Hallo list,
I want to use this machine as a dual-boot system together with windows. It
is connected to a standard PS2-KVM, no USB-mouse or keyboard. Installation
of both Windows
I have the following setup:
|
| (67.95.100.16 - fxp4)
| (67.95.100.17 - fxp4)
|EXTERNAL|
|
Hello Nick,
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007, Nick Holland wrote:
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hallo list,
I want to use this machine as a dual-boot system together with windows. It
is connected to a standard PS2-KVM, no USB-mouse or keyboard. Installation
of both Windows and OpenBSD 4.0 from CDs worked without
It was just targeted at THIS particular issue and the future ideas to
continue making OpenBSD (development) better/more fun.
And by detracting from the important issue which is:
* We need gear in europe for f2k7 *
You manage to sidetrack something important with your hack.
So in
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
their website states that it is possible. My main question is how to
create an
Jeez, I sense some hostility on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andreas, It's a nice effort,
but unfortunately, it won't support the goals of f2k7. The most
important lacking thing for the hackathon is fast, memory-packed
machines, and lots of disks. AKA, modern expensive, top of the
line stuff. It seems to
What is wrong with the iso that is on the ftp sites? Can't you finish
the install over the network?
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:17:56PM -0500, Peter wrote:
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on
-Original Message-
From: Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 2:18 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed
OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox
On 2/27/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
their website states that it is possible.
Buy a CD set http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html ;-)
GTG
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
On 2/27/07, Gareth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question may be more appropriate for tech@ but i thought i'd try
here first just in case.
lets say i have a bunch of #defines, for example (from
sys/dev/wscons/wsconsio.h):
/* Event type definitions. Comment for each is information in value. */
On 2/27/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
their website states that it is possible.
On 2007/02/27 12:31, Albert Chin wrote:
I created a queue to limit traffic on the internal interface
connecting 'EXTERNAL FIREWALL' to 'WWW/FTP SERVER':
altq on fxp1 cbq bandwidth 1.5Mb queue \
{ queue_std, queue_ftp, queue_http }
queue queue_std bandwidth 1.48Mb cbq(default)
Hi there,
On Tuesday, 27. February 2007 20:17, Peter wrote:
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0 as a
Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on Gentoo
Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD as guest even though
their website states
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 11:31 am, Albert Chin wrote:
I have the following setup:
| (67.95.100.16 - fxp4)
| (67.95.100.17 - fxp4)
|EXTERNAL|
I have received several assurances that
-current may have resolved some weirds
for i386 on amd64 processors...
With hesitation I could try jumping to current
instead of stable amd64.
I have used -current on productin before,
but only after verifying the ports could
make w/o fubars
Either amd64
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:29:32PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
Jeez, I sense some hostility on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andreas, It's a nice
effort,
but unfortunately, it won't support the goals of f2k7. The most
important lacking thing for the hackathon is fast, memory-packed
machines, and lots
Le Mardi 27 Fivrier 2007 14:34, Darren Spruell a icrit :
On 2/27/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0
as a Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on
Gentoo Linux 2006.1. The manual does not mention OBSD
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:40:41PM -0700, Tim Kuhlman wrote:
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 11:31 am, Albert Chin wrote:
[ snip snip ]
You are queueing on fxp1 on the external firewall. This should
affect traffic going from the external firewall to the www/ftp
server, however it sounds like
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Hah. Developing an ueberfast FPGA network card needs at least a manyear of
work and that's a very optimistic prognosis. I guess buying two three
motherbords and a bunch of GigE cards (two or three cards for em, bge,
bnx, sk, msk) will give you a good testbed for figuring out
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 07:57:58PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/02/27 12:31, Albert Chin wrote:
I created a queue to limit traffic on the internal interface
connecting 'EXTERNAL FIREWALL' to 'WWW/FTP SERVER':
altq on fxp1 cbq bandwidth 1.5Mb queue \
{ queue_std, queue_ftp,
Hi list,
I was wondering if anyone has tried this machine succesfully?
The SmarArray P800 is supported on 4.0 (and the P400 and e200 seems to
have been added to 4.1), altough ciss(4) doesnt mention SAS on the 4.0
version, only SATA. Is it the same? The nic exact model isnt listed on
bge(4)
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
spamd(8) says:
spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all
whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4) table.
How exactly does spamd configure spamd-white table?
The objective is
I am interested too.
On 2/27/07, Alejandro Lozanoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I was wondering if anyone has tried this machine succesfully?
The SmarArray P800 is supported on 4.0 (and the P400 and e200 seems to
have been added to 4.1), altough ciss(4) doesnt mention SAS on the 4.0
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:55:50 -0800, Tom Bombadil wrote:
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
spamd(8) says:
spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all
whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4) table.
How exactly
Tom Bombadil wrote:
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
You won't be playing with spamd-white table except for testing.
You should declare your whitelist to spamd.conf
white:\
:white:\
:method=file:\
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 14:25, Peter wrote:
Le Mardi 27 Fivrier 2007 14:34, Darren Spruell a icrit :
On 2/27/07, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for comments from people who have installed OpenBSD 4.0
as a Virtualbox guest. I am currently running Virtualbox 1.3.6 on
Oops, forgot to add my dmesg. This kernel is GENERIC+RAIDFrame:
OpenBSD 4.1-beta (JGGIMI) #14: Sun Feb 25 13:36:43 EST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/JGGIMI
cpu0: AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ (AuthenticAMD 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) 1.84 GHz
cpu0:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:26:50PM +, sof bo wrote:
Hi,
I've got now a openBSD kernel with USB
I would like to see all debug
(printf in code)
I compile with option USB_debug but i have not get more
message
what have I to do?
Quite a few parts of the kernel seem to follow the
After building -current on Feb 25, I noticed when I attempted to use S/Key
remotely, that it was not a permitted authentication style. (I use S/Key
when publc key authentication is not available, so it may have nothing to do
with recent changes to how sshd_config Match works, and may be
Please send a Debug3 trace (sshd -dddp222), debug level 1 doesn't
contain all the necessary information
-d
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Josh Grosse wrote:
After building -current on Feb 25, I noticed when I attempted to use S/Key
remotely, that it was not a permitted authentication style. (I use
I am also stuck at launching the virtualbox interface itself. I get
either a segmentation fault if started using a non-priv user or
an 'authentication rejected' error if I 'su -c virtualbox'. I have
tried the usual trick of 'xhost +' as the non-priv user and then su to
root and
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:20:20PM -0700, Damien Miller wrote:
Please send a Debug3 trace (sshd -dddp222), debug level 1 doesn't
contain all the necessary information
debug2: load_server_config: filename /etc/ssh/sshd_config
debug2: load_server_config: done config len = 268
debug2:
also, does it work if you try connecting without any keys in your ssh-agent?
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Josh Grosse wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:20:20PM -0700, Damien Miller wrote:
Please send a Debug3 trace (sshd -dddp222), debug level 1 doesn't
contain all the necessary information
...
what does the client say? (ssh -vvvp 222 localhost)
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Josh Grosse wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:20:20PM -0700, Damien Miller wrote:
Please send a Debug3 trace (sshd -dddp222), debug level 1 doesn't
contain all the necessary information
debug2: load_server_config:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:38:37PM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
After building -current on Feb 25, I noticed when I attempted to use S/Key
remotely, that it was not a permitted authentication style. (I use S/Key
when publc key authentication is not available, so it may have nothing to do
with
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:00:59AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:38:37PM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
After building -current on Feb 25, I noticed when I attempted to use S/Key
remotely, that it was not a permitted authentication style. (I use S/Key
when publc key
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 15:09]:
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
Yes.
spamd(8) says:
spamd regularly scans the /var/db/spamd database and configures all
whitelist addresses as the spamd-white pf(4)
Paul Pruett wrote:
I have received several assurances that
-current may have resolved some weirds
for i386 on amd64 processors...
With hesitation I could try jumping to current
instead of stable amd64.
I have used -current on productin before,
but only after verifying the ports could
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:00:59AM +1100, Darren Tucker wrote:
...It works if you set KbdInteractiveAuthentication yes in sshd_config
(and I suggest this as a workaround) rather than relying on
ChallengeResponseAuthentication.
It does, indeed, work with that added to my sshd_config file.
# ntop -i bridge0
bridge0: no IPv4 address assigned
and it stops running... try darkstat but read on.
Unless I am misunderstanding the concept of a bridge, I don't think a
bridge can even have an IP address. Any ideas?
this is the contents of my /etc/bridgename.bridge0
add xl0
add
I found it highly amusing that as a result of runnig the latest spamd
in greylisting mode with this change
Make spamd include the HELO/EHLO identification string sent by
the connecting hosts in the tuple key when greylisting. catches
a few more bogus hosts and will let us trap based on HELO
Miod Vallat wrote:
Since I know little about filesystems, I'm basically asking to any
developper if this FS would be a good addition to OpenBSD...or the goals are
way too different and it wouldn't be very useful.
How can we answer your question as long as the design itself is a moving
target?
Darren Spruell wrote:
On 2/26/07, Shohrukh Shoyokubov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have problem with assigning IP addresses to wireless clients using
DHCP. I have two D-Link DWL-G700AP access points and turned their DHCP
servers off. They are connected to my wired network, where my
i am forced to use windows at work and am trying to get a vmware openbsd
VM to recognize the non-virtual interfaces, so as to have openbsd as the
router for the windows system. this is using the free vmplayer v1.0.3.
i've read and followed
http://www.cs.drexel.edu/~vp/VirtualFirewall/
and can
Dear all
any change to make OBSD 4.0 running in device , such as wrt54G (linksys ).
sonjaya
http://sicute.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:08 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Unsupported USB - Serial Adapter
On 2007/02/27 08:50, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:30:33AM -0500, Wade, Daniel
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 05:44:05PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
* Tom Bombadil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-02-27 15:09]:
Greetings...
By any chance, will spamd delete any IPs that I add manually to spamd-white?
Yes.
consider the entries in spamd-white to be the exclusive stomping
and can only see the pcn0 interface under the VM (which is 3.8-release,
btw) after following the suggestions contained therein. any clues about
getting the VM to recognize the real physical interfaces would be great.
Unfortunately there is no way to get at the actual physical nics from a
Hi all,
When I build any package that needs the latest release of gettext, gettext
blows up on the final install from the built package...
this is current Feb 24...
# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-unknown-openbsd4.1/3.3.5/specs
Configured with:
Thread model: single
gcc version
guys have you tried installing Postfix + Courier-Imap + Mysql + SASL2 +
PostfixAdmin...? i've been looking for howto's several days for now but i
couldn't help myself to let that quota work. i found that tutorial at
http://postfix.wiki.xs4all.nl/index.php?title=OpenBSD_PostfixAdmin_Guide
at works
87 matches
Mail list logo
