Hi,
I tried this program(below) on Linux OpenBSD. It
works on Linux but not on OpenBSD.
The program, which is trivial, tries to send a
multicast packet to a mcast group. send() fails with
Host is down error message. Its working perfectly
with Linux and I am able to recieve that packet from
On 6/9/07, Marti Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/07, Bray Mailloux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I'm trying to get my WWW server, public: 64.142.102.11; private:
192.168.1.4, to answer requests from the internet. Each time I try to
access the public address, via firefox, the browser
Hi,
I am using the send program from this example:
http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2/multicast/antony/example.html#sender
The only modification is the use of setsockopt() to
set the interface from which I want to send the
packet.
The setsockopt() succeeds but sendto() fails with
host is down
Hi,
I have 3 Tyan Trinity GC-SL boxes with OpenBSD 4.1. sensors kernel process
use 10% of the CPU time and have RES high up to 74 MB.
I did not have a sensorsd daemon runing.
I do the same on my soekris, nothing like that.
Any idea ?
JG Pailloncy
# top -uIS -s1
load averages: 1.18, 0.96,
On 6/10/07, tantric The [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried this program(below) on Linux OpenBSD. It
works on Linux but not on OpenBSD.
The program, which is trivial, tries to send a
multicast packet to a mcast group. send() fails with
Host is down error message. Its working perfectly
with Linux
I have several machines running OpenBSD 4.1, and am really impressed
by how easy it is to get IPSEC working between them these days. Thanks
people, it's great.
Unfortunately one other machine I'd dearly like to include is a MacOSX
10.4.9 machine, running racoon.
Yes I have googled, yes I have
You need to configure your machine as a multicast
host by adding the line
multicast_host=YES
Thank you very much, its working now.
regards
Praveen
PS:forgot CC to the list
Now that's room service!
On 2007/06/11 18:18, Christopher Vance wrote:
Before I struggle too much longer trying to configure racoon to do the
right thing, or give in to using a package not in the OpenBSD base
system, is there someone out there actually running IPSEC with MacOSX
on one end and OpenBSD on the other,
On 9 Jun 2007, at 6:22 PM, Diana Eichert wrote:
A big shout out to deanna@ for getting this up on undeadly.org.
Okay, y'all, with deanna@'s post of dlg@'s request on undeadly.org
this is gathering steam. So, keep your cards(Credit) and letters($
EUR YEN) coming, so Santa can visit Aus. a
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Praveen wrote:
Hi,
I am using the send program from this example:
http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2/multicast/antony/example.html#sender
The only modification is the use of setsockopt() to
set the interface from which I want to send the
packet.
The setsockopt()
* Jean-Girard Pailloncy wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 Tyan Trinity GC-SL boxes with OpenBSD 4.1. sensors kernel process
use 10% of the CPU time and have RES high up to 74 MB.
I did not have a sensorsd daemon runing.
I do the same on my soekris, nothing like that.
try to disable iic and ichicc in UKC
Hi All,
Regarding the issue I mentioned below, it is because I am using
the Intel Motherboard. I have read some email before regarding
the same problem, in those email, need to change the
vparam.h (something) and to build the stable.
I was able to run the OpenBSD 4.1 with the hardware now.
Hi All,
Regarding the issue I mentioned below, it is because I am using
the Intel Motherboard. I have read some email before regarding
the same problem, in those email, need to change the
vparam.h (something) and to build the stable.
I was able to run the OpenBSD 4.1 with the hardware now.
On 6/11/07, Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
The test program doesn't set sin_len. Try adding
addr.sin_len = sizeof(addr);.
I don't believe that's necessary. According to Stevens's UNIX
Network Programming, the only time a user-space program needs to set
the sin_len member is when
We have an OpenBSD firewall running for a while now. Since a few days we
encounter some sort of selective natting. I try to ping a host, I get
reply,
and 2 minutes later I try to ping the same host and I dont get replies.
So despite the state being created in both instances, you see a
I have 3 Tyan Trinity GC-SL boxes with OpenBSD 4.1. sensors kernel
process
use 10% of the CPU time and have RES high up to 74 MB.
I did not have a sensorsd daemon runing.
I do the same on my soekris, nothing like that.
try to disable iic and ichicc in UKC (boot bsd -c).
Works.
Thank you.
JG
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Diana Eichert wrote:
Sad, well I'll throw US$100 into the mix if someone wants to
co-ordinate it. I don't have any use for Itanium, but I do know that
dlg@ has done some great work, so I might as well support him in
something he wants to do.
Anyone else?
dian
I just
List,
I have a question regarding the value given to MINIROOTSIZE in a kernel
configuration file.
I have a working ramdisk build (4.1) which has a MINIROOTSIZE of 23000.
Howeverr I try a MINIROOTSIZE of 32768 and the boot stalls at the entry
point part. Please see below:
PC Engines
Bonjour,
Suite ` lintirjt croissant de la protection sur Internet,
lenregistrement de votre marque est devenue une prioriti.
Dicouvrez de linformation pertinente, une illustration et un outil clair
pour se garantir pendant des annies, des cybersquatteurs.
Dans lattente dun prochain contact,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:18:45 +1000, Christopher Vance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have several machines running OpenBSD 4.1, and am really impressed
by how easy it is to get IPSEC working between them these days. Thanks
people, it's great.
Unfortunately one other machine I'd dearly like to
--- Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 08:37:42PM -0600, Philip Guenther wrote:
On 5/28/07, Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am serving up email via imap (courier-imap) on OpenBSD 4.0.
My users (with Outlook) complain of french characters being
Anyone run zmailer on an OpenBSD i386 system?
--
Dana Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Summary
===
I have a problem with suspend-to-RAM on an IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad T41p
running OpenBSD 4.1-stable. Basically, suspend-to-RAM works fine if
I'm not running X, but hangs the system if I'm running X. My basic
question is, has anyone gotten suspend-to-RAM to work while X is
running on a
On 6/11/07, Jonathan Thornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My basic
question is, has anyone gotten suspend-to-RAM to work while X is
running on a T41p, and if so, how did you do it?
You might look at tphdisk.
Hi,
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=118157353605570w=1
I wrote
My basic
question is, has anyone gotten suspend-to-RAM to work while X is
running on a T41p, and if so, how did you do it?
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=118157460315701w=1,
James Hartley suggested:
You
There was a thread discussing this and proposing the solution less then 72
hours before you sent this. The list archives tell all!
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscw=2r=1s=MINIROOTSIZEq=b
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, mgb wrote:
List,
I have a question regarding the value given to MINIROOTSIZE in a
Running i386-current with a 26-May build everything is fine. I just built
a new kernel today, and got:
WARNING: raid0: end of partition `a' exceeds the size of raid (69206144)
WARNING: raid0: end of partition `e' exceeds the size of raid (69206144)
And then dropped into ddb, since it cannot
Dag-Erling SmC8rgrav wrote:
A shoo-in candidate for Bruce Schneier's doghouse award...
Nuts, and I was going to use it for a crime against humanity.
On 11/06/07, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jean-Girard Pailloncy wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 Tyan Trinity GC-SL boxes with OpenBSD 4.1. sensors kernel process
use 10% of the CPU time and have RES high up to 74 MB.
I did not have a sensorsd daemon runing.
I do the same on my soekris,
On 2007/06/11 13:00, Josh Grosse wrote:
Running i386-current with a 26-May build everything is fine. I just built
a new kernel today, and got:
softraidtm* is in GENERIC now and it autoconfigures; it may be causing
a conflict with raidframe since they both use partitions with type raid.
If you
On 6/11/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Admin that really know their stuff, will put them just as an other
stone in their knowledge, but sadly most will put it on top and as first
to justify they are good and know what you need and these same one will
also put in to all their
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Please contact krw@, he has been searching testers for RAIDframe root
autoconfig on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's even a diff posted there, iirc.
I'm your point-man there. A while back I wrote 3 pages of
technical detritus on making it work in 3.9/4.0.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 04:47:43PM +0200, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
Summary
===
I have a problem with suspend-to-RAM on an IBM/Lenovo ThinkPad T41p
running OpenBSD 4.1-stable. Basically, suspend-to-RAM works fine if
I'm not running X, but hangs the system if I'm running X. My basic
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Please contact krw@, he has been searching testers for RAIDframe root
autoconfig on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's even a diff posted there, iirc.
I'm your point-man there. A while back I wrote 3
Hi,
as a reminder for all in Scandinavia, there is an informal event in Stockholm
next Saturday:
http://www.slackathon.se/
I just packaged a huge box of stuff for the event ;-)
Wim.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On 6/11/07, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Please contact krw@, he has been searching testers for RAIDframe root
autoconfig on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's even a diff posted there, iirc.
I'm
here is a dmesg from 4.1 RELEASE, and the Raid set is fine, everything
works.
penBSD 4.1 (GENERIC.MP) #1225: Sat Mar 10 19:23:18 MST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.81 GHz
cpu0:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What's the deal for upgrading systems running RAIDframe?
I have Sparc64 boxes running 4.0 and RAIDframe. Is it possible to
upgrade these through the regular process, or do I need to do a clean
install and restore from backups?
Thanks in advance for
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:48:22PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
softraidtm* is in GENERIC now and it autoconfigures; it may be causing
a conflict with raidframe since they both use partitions with type raid.
If you want to try disabling it, it's in the MI kernel config,
/sys/conf/GENERIC.
Hi,
Thank you very much.
If they are blacklisted, the connected/disconntected message
will name the blacklist(s) they are on. if they are greylisted, there
will be no mention of lists in the log message. For example, from my logs,
So if the host is greylisted the connection should not last
Hi,
The default setup in pf.conf makes spamd work on both
directions:
#no rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from spamd-white to any port smtp
#rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port smtp \
# - 127.0.0.1 port spamd
What is the best way to tell PF that spamd should work only
on inbound
I use an X22 with Linux, and I simply added chvt to my suspend script to
change to a text console before suspend. OpenBSD does not have chvt as
far as I know, but Google found the following:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~joshuad/wsswitch.c
I haven't tested it, but I guess it should do the job, unless
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:50:48AM -0700, David Newman wrote:
What's the deal for upgrading systems running RAIDframe?
I have Sparc64 boxes running 4.0 and RAIDframe. Is it possible to
upgrade these through the regular process, or do I need to do a clean
install and restore from backups?
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:53:49PM -0400, I wrote:
What I have always done is a manual upgrade:
1. Back up.
2. Boot in single user mode
3. # mount -a -t ffs
4. For each fileset except etcXX.tgz and xetcXX.tgz, issue:
# tar xpzf fileset -C /
5. Using etcXX.tgz and xetcXX.tgz,
Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running i386-current with a 26-May build everything is fine. I just built
a new kernel today, and got:
Another data point: My sparc64 with a -current (yesterday) kernel
with root on raidframe is fine both with and without krw's tech
patch.
--
Christian
read the archives for the answer to this and other fascinating
questions.
or look very carefully at the contents of that directory.
* Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-09 04:53]:
I've noticed that original greyscanner by beck@ doesn't work with latest
spamd.
Is there
Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. Using etcXX.tgz and xetcXX.tgz, manually update /etc and /var, and make
any other changes, per the upgrade FAQ. The mergemaster port/package
makes this fairly quick and easy.
6. # cd /dev; sh MAKEDEV all
mergemaster will offer to do
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:01:03PM -0400, I wrote:
...so it looks like the patch in tech@ is my next step.
I have retrofitted it for rev 1.39, but it did not eliminate my problem. :(
Index: rf_openbsdkintf.c
===
RCS file:
pseudo devices can not be disabled in UKC. Maja has a diff for that.
I'll try to have a look at that soonish so that it can be disabled. If
one wants to run raidframe one should disable softraid. I have not
tested it but would expect them to step on each other.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 04:03:11PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
pseudo devices can not be disabled in UKC. Maja has a diff for that.
I'll try to have a look at that soonish so that it can be disabled. If
one wants to run raidframe one should disable softraid. I have not
tested it but would
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:45:45PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
here is a dmesg from 4.1 RELEASE, and the Raid set is fine, everything
works.
told ya :)
penBSD 4.1 (GENERIC.MP) #1225: Sat Mar 10 19:23:18 MST 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Marco Peereboom wrote:
pseudo devices can not be disabled in UKC. Maja has a diff for that.
I'll try to have a look at that soonish so that it can be disabled. If
one wants to run raidframe one should disable softraid. I have not
tested it but would expect them to step
* Jean-Girard Pailloncy wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 Tyan Trinity GC-SL boxes with OpenBSD 4.1. sensors kernel
process
use 10% of the CPU time and have RES high up to 74 MB.
I did not have a sensorsd daemon runing.
I do the same on my soekris, nothing like that.
try to disable iic and ichicc in
Hi,
I've extracted two functions from Pidgin and its SIPE plugin. Both
functions are returning an IP address of an interface (if I understand
correctly).
I'm attaching C source and output from OpenBSD and Linux. On Linux this
function detects an IP address correctly, but on OpenBSD not.
Here is
I've readed netinfro(4), ifmedia(4), getifaddrs(3) but still not
understand difference between Linux and OpenBSD. Links to any other
documentation, books and manuals will be good enough for me.
--
best regards
q#
http://www.arabbeveragesforum.com/teaser/images/abf_2007_01.jpg
http://www.arabbeveragesforum.com/teaser/images/abf_2007_02.jpg
http://www.arabbeveragesforum.com/teaser/images/abf_2007_03.jpg
http://www.arabbeveragesforum.com/teaser/images/abf_2007_04.jpg
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:34:26PM +0100, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
Hi,
I've extracted two functions from Pidgin and its SIPE plugin. Both
functions are returning an IP address of an interface (if I understand
correctly).
I'm attaching C source and output from OpenBSD and Linux. On Linux
Josh Grosse wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 03:53:49PM -0400, I wrote:
What I have always done is a manual upgrade:
1. Back up.
2. Boot in single user mode
3. # mount -a -t ffs
4. For each fileset except etcXX.tgz and xetcXX.tgz, issue:
# tar xpzf fileset -C /
5. Using etcXX.tgz
On 2007/06/08 16:02, Bob Beck wrote:
rdr-anchor hoststated/smtp from spamd-white
rdr proto tcp from !spamd-exempt to $MX port smtp - 127.0.0.1 port spamd
The fact that those two table names are different looks suspiciously
wrong to me.
It took you pointing this out for me to
I sent this message to sparc@ and received no reply, except strangely
enough from a buddy at Sun. Can anybody give me some guidance on
making sure I get panic information and/or a DDB prompt?
-peter
Begin forwarded message:
Just a heads up, since I can't really provide much more
On 6/10/07, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's just as stupid as requiring people have a cert. Lots of people have
certs because so many places toss your resume if you don't have MCSE or
CCNA listed on it. Just because they have a cert doesn't mean they don't
know what they're doing.
alot
Hello Christopher,
On 11/06/2007 Christopher Vance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have several machines running OpenBSD 4.1, and am really impressed
by how easy it is to get IPSEC working between them these days. Thanks
people, it's great.
Unfortunately one other machine I'd dearly like to
Hi,
I'm posting a mpi success. Great work on the mpt(4)
rewrite David, Marco.
The same LSI7102XP under solaris8 on a Netra120
was netting 7MB/sec write, 18MB/sec read using
LSI's driver. sd1 is a Dothill SANnet II FC setup with
4 146G 10k FC drives in Raid5 with a 512k byte stripe size.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Diana Eichert wrote:
Sad, well I'll throw US$100 into the mix if someone wants to
co-ordinate it. I don't have any use for Itanium, but I do know that
dlg@ has done some great work, so I might as well
Diana Eichert wrote:
Uggg, certs, I give little credence to any vendor cert. So many
people use bootcamps for tests and walk away with little more than
paper. I know, I work with them.
Indeed. The problem isn't with certification in itself but the way it
currently works in the IT
On 6/11/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed. The problem isn't with certification in itself but the way it
currently works in the IT industry. The majority of the people with
certification got it by going to a boot camp or buying one of them
examcram books thus end up with a
On 6/11/07, Karsten McMinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alot of anti-cert sentiment. borderline misinformation in
some cases. I've interviewed folks with and without certs.
I don't know why some people insist on arguing
that book != cover[1] with regard to certs. silly.
here's a couple points for
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:59:46PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
am I missing something, or did you neglect to help him with his question,
which was about how to upgrade with RAIDframe in use?
I had everything except building the kernel, and placing it on the one (or
two) non-RAIDFrame controlled
68 matches
Mail list logo
