Chipset: Ralink RT2501USB. (RT2528+RT2571W)
rum0 at uhub0 port 1 Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN rev 2.00/0.01 addr 3
rum0: MAC/BBP RT2573 (rev 0x2573a), RF RT2528, address 00:0e:e8:e0:c4:17
Index: rum.4
===
RCS file:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:41:39AM -0500, scott wrote:
Thanks, everyone, for the user- vs kernel-land info. As soon as I read
it, I got it. Disappointed but I got it.
ipsec/isakpmd is, I think, kernel-land and it has some very flexible
(per ipsec rule, not just daemon level, as in user or
Hi!
I am writing a script that would be nice to be able to run
with only the root partition mounted, and it works fine
except that I find no way to read .gz compressed
files without e.g /usr/bin/zcat.
So my questions are: is there a program in /sbin:/bin
that can decompress .gz compressed files?
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
I am writing a script that would be nice to be able to run
with only the root partition mounted, and it works fine
except that I find no way to read .gz compressed
files without e.g /usr/bin/zcat.
You can do it with something like this in single user mode:
# mount /usr
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:23:47AM +0100, giovanni wrote:
Chipset: Ralink RT2501USB. (RT2528+RT2571W)
rum0 at uhub0 port 1 Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN rev 2.00/0.01 addr 3
rum0: MAC/BBP RT2573 (rev 0x2573a), RF RT2528, address 00:0e:e8:e0:c4:17
Index: rum.4
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Han Boetes wrote:
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
I am writing a script that would be nice to be able to run
with only the root partition mounted, and it works fine
except that I find no way to read .gz compressed
files without e.g /usr/bin/zcat.
You can
dear list,
recently i upgrade one of my machine to 4.3-beta, and found the new
snmp program,
but i'm still using the net-snmp from ports, and somehow when i try to
issue the oid
.1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 ( ip address look up ) it did not show anything,
but if i use opensnmpd
and issue the same oid,
On 2008-03-04, Agung T. Apriyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
recently i upgrade one of my machine to 4.3-beta, and found the new
snmp program, but i'm still using the net-snmp from ports
Did you upgrade net-snmp to a version that will match your new kernel?
1. In php.ini, set
short_open_tag = On
2. Apply the following patch where you have installed NfSen:
--- libexec/Nfcomm.pm.orig Sun Feb 17 13:12:15 2008
+++ libexec/Nfcomm.pm Sun Feb 17 13:12:20 2008
@@ -753,6 +753,7 @@
return undef;
}
Peter,
Thank you very much. Is there way to see protocol based graph view like ftp,
http, ssh, voip, P2P (bittorrent, edonkey, kazaa etc.,).
I saw Nfsen only show tcp/udp, icmp and port based graph.
Peter Haag-2 wrote:
1. In php.ini, set
short_open_tag = On
2. Apply the following
yes i did upgrade ports to current too, now its net-snmp 5.4.1
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-03-04, Agung T. Apriyanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
recently i upgrade one of my machine to 4.3-beta, and found the new
snmp program, but i'm
--On March 4, 2008 10:03:43 AM -0800 Balgaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Peter,
|
| Thank you very much. Is there way to see protocol based graph view like ftp,
| http, ssh, voip, P2P (bittorrent, edonkey, kazaa etc.,).
|
| I saw Nfsen only show tcp/udp, icmp and port based graph.
Create a
Hi,
this is my first attemp to installa OpenBSD on a system...
I have an Epia PD mini-itx system
(http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/mainboards/motherboards.jsp?motherboard_id=241)
with a Intel PCI ethernet card
(Intel PRO/1000MT Dual Port Server Adapter - PWLA8492MT)
when I try to install OpenBSD
Hi,
I am running OpenBSD 4.0 with carp+isakmpd+sasyncd+pf on 166MHz Pentium
boards. Everything is working well. There are 6 locations, all clustered (2
redundant firewalls).
When I fail one cluster the other one takes over with some packet loss. I see
the carp is doing its thing.
hi!
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 10:57:57PM +0700, Agung T. Apriyanto wrote:
recently i upgrade one of my machine to 4.3-beta, and found the new
snmp program,
but i'm still using the net-snmp from ports, and somehow when i try to
issue the oid
.1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 ( ip address look up ) it did
Hi,
I need to setup a bridge to run spamd in greylisting mode.
Since there have been some changes in spamd recently and
the ruleset that appeared in the article in the OpenBSD
Journal in the past
(http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20061108134508)
is more appropriate for blacklist mode, I
I need to setup a bridge to run spamd in greylisting mode.
Since there have been some changes in spamd recently and
the ruleset that appeared in the article in the OpenBSD
Journal in the past
(http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20061108134508)
is more appropriate for blacklist mode, I
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, things changed. Check the manual pages. They are
accurate.
Also, since this bridge is going to have to handle a lot
of messages (some 50K legitimate and possibly some 450k
spams) daily, what kind of tunning
you mean the new snmpd is working correctly but net-snmp is not? this
doesn't surprise me, there were some issues with net-snmp in the past,
this was one of my reasons to start working on a new implementation.
yes, concerning i'm just graphing interface traffic via mrtg/cacti
there is no
Right about now is a great time for our user community to jump in and
do some install and upgrade tests.
The 4.3 release cycle is fully in swing, and I hope that I can get it
over with soon so that the developers can start work on the bug fixes
and new work that can't make it into 4.3.
Here's a
Hi,
I'm curious what the developers think about the attack angles Ben Hawkes put
forth at Ruxcon in 2006. I did manage to find a note in an archive suggesting
that these doors were closed, but I could not tell if they are?
Ref:
http://ruxcon.org.au/files/hawkes_openbsd.pdf
Exploiting OpenBSD
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:57 PM, steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm curious what the developers think about the attack angles Ben Hawkes put
forth at Ruxcon in 2006. I did manage to find a note in an archive suggesting
that these doors were closed, but I could not tell if they
Peter,
How can I create profile?
I am new to Nfsen+Nfdump. I need to create profile on Nfsen or?
Peter Haag-2 wrote:
--On March 4, 2008 10:03:43 AM -0800 Balgaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Peter,
|
| Thank you very much. Is there way to see protocol based graph view like
ftp,
| http,
Hi All
I'm just wondering how many people out there are using the floppy.fs
installer still? I'm wondering if it would be a worthwhile thought to
expand past the 1.44Mb limit for the CD and .rd install options if there
are features that can be added to the installer. No, I'm not thinking a
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, David Higgs wrote:
I'm curious what the developers think about the attack angles Ben Hawkes
put forth at Ruxcon in 2006. I did manage to find a note in an archive
suggesting that these doors were closed, but I could not tell if they
are?
I'm just wondering how many people out there are using the floppy.fs
installer still?
I think your assumption is that we are facing the space problem just
from the i386 side. We are not. We run on lots of architectures.
There is some semblance of size pressure from all architectures.
But in
--On March 4, 2008 19:38:58 -0800 Balgaa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Peter,
|
| How can I create profile?
|
| I am new to Nfsen+Nfdump. I need to create profile on Nfsen or?
Please read the documentation. Everything is written there.
- Peter
|
|
|
| Peter Haag-2 wrote:
|
| --On March 4,
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm just wondering how many people out there are using the floppy.fs
installer still?
I think your assumption is that we are facing the space problem just
from the i386 side. We are not. We run on lots of architectures.
There is some semblance of size
Paul Greidanus wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm just wondering how many people out there are using the floppy.fs
installer still?
I think your assumption is that we are facing the space problem just
from the i386 side. We are not. We run on lots of architectures.
There is some semblance
On 3/5/08, steve szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the malloc is addressed. Anything on the other attack vectors?
Do you have a particular concern or are you asking for a 53 slide
response presentation?
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm just wondering how many people out there are using the floppy.fs
installer still?
I think your assumption is that we are facing the space problem just
from the i386 side. We are not. We run on lots of architectures.
There is some semblance of size pressure from
Theo de Raadt wrote:
In a worst case, if
there is a useful, yet large feature, it can be added into cd and
bsd.rd, but leaving it out of floppy? Having the floppy makes Open
unique, and it's a good thing to have.
Like what? Where's the diff for this useful, very large feature?
32 matches
Mail list logo
