Re: no 4.2-stable package updates??

2008-05-02 Thread Toni Mueller
Hi Brian, On Wed, 12.12.2007 at 11:26:13 -0500, Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a vulnxml feed for OpenBSD ports. It should be updated with critical patches, and those should be pulled into 4.2-stable. are you talking about this website? http://www.vuxml.org/openbsd/

Fw: issue on Attansic Technology L1 network card and OpenBSD

2008-05-02 Thread don cipo
Asus doesn't have the technical documentation and they send me to Atheros while Attansic send me to Asus for the docs. No comment ... - Original Message - From: Jay Cliburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: don cipo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 2:45 AM Subject: Re: issue on

-current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Maxim Belooussov
Hi all, How to enable rthreads in -current? Old way with RTHREADS kernel option and ln -s librthread doesn't work anymore. Maxim

Re: issue on Attansic Technology L1 network card and OpenBSD

2008-05-02 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Hm, you really should try talk to the Linux guys. I'm a bit astonished about Attansic's/Atheros' behaviour as even on my Asus driver CD, there is source code for a driver for that chip, IIRC it was even commented so you don't have only magic numbers. If you're interested in that code, I'll search

Re: issue on Attansic Technology L1 network card and OpenBSD

2008-05-02 Thread don cipo
Well ... I'm not a programmer ... maybe there is someone skilled enough interested to port that code on OpenBSD. As far as I know there is a reverse engineered driver for the L2 chip. Maybe this is also possible for the L1. - Original Message - From: Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL

Re: issue on Attansic Technology L1 network card and OpenBSD

2008-05-02 Thread don cipo
You're right ! L1 and L2 chips are not compatible. - Original Message - From: Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: don cipo [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 2:02 PM Subject: Re: issue on Attansic Technology L1 network card and OpenBSD -- This

Re: issue on Attansic Technology L1 network card and OpenBSD

2008-05-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-05-02, Jonathan Schleifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hm, you really should try talk to the Linux guys. I'm a bit astonished about Attansic's/Atheros' behaviour as even on my Asus driver CD, there is source code for a driver for that chip, IIRC it was even commented so you don't have only

Buying 4.2 CD

2008-05-02 Thread Monah Baki
Why the 4.2 CD set is missing in https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order Thank you BSD Networking, Microsoft Notworking

Re: upgrade 4.2 (i386) - 4.3 (amd64)

2008-05-02 Thread Etienne Robillard
On Thu, 1 May 2008 18:14:17 + (UTC) Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-05-01, Marten Rizwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have am Opteron box that is running 4.2 i386 right now, due to the fact that cvsupd doesn't compile on amd64. However, I've converted to cvsync and I

network statement, bgpd.conf

2008-05-02 Thread Peter Bristow
Hi, I've been playing with OpenBGPD and hit a problem. How would one go about setting multiple attributes from with in a network statement. Something along the lines of network 92.48.111.0/26 set community 64667:999 set nexthop 92.48.95.196. or is the approved way of doing it to write filter

the snapshots way

2008-05-02 Thread Mihai Popescu B.S.
Hello, Since the applications packages are not updated anymore for -release / -stable I decided to follow the snapshots. I know that this way is for experienced users and I'm not as good as a developer but I need to stay with this. The FAQ is not so rich in answers for this section. The other

Re: network statement, bgpd.conf

2008-05-02 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:39:08PM +0100, Peter Bristow wrote: Hi, I've been playing with OpenBGPD and hit a problem. How would one go about setting multiple attributes from with in a network statement. Something along the lines of network 92.48.111.0/26 set community 64667:999 set nexthop

sgi/4.3 slow?

2008-05-02 Thread Maurice Janssen
Hi, I installed 4.3-release on an O2 and noticed that it is quite slow compared to 4.1-stable. For example, it took more than 5 hours to build a kernel, that's about the same as my Vax ;-) Right now I'm running a make build and it is dead slow. Load is around 0.10 and top shows that the machine

Re: Buying 4.2 CD

2008-05-02 Thread Steve Shockley
Monah Baki wrote: Why the 4.2 CD set is missing in https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order Probably an oversight. http://www.openbsd.org/items.html#42

PF and states of connections with same src port

2008-05-02 Thread B A
Hello! I have question about PF. I have just found interesting behavior of of PF. For example if I fix source port and run from my PC: echo 'aaa' | nc -p www.my.rerver 80 I got response. But if I just run this command again - connection stuck. I should wait about 1 min to be

Re: PF and states of connections with same src port

2008-05-02 Thread Kian Mohageri
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:35 AM, B A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I have question about PF. I have just found interesting behavior of of PF. For example if I fix source port and run from my PC: echo 'aaa' | nc -p www.my.rerver 80 I got response. But if I just

Re: Problems with 4.1 PHP5 modules

2008-05-02 Thread L. V. Lammert
At 02:42 PM 4/25/2008 -0500, Mark Rolen wrote: L. V. Lammert wrote: PHP is working [cli or web], .. problem is none of the modules are. Both mysql mcrypt, for example, are enabled in php.ini, but neither shows in phpinfo. Have you verified that the *.so files php is looking for

Re: -current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Maxim Belooussov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How to enable rthreads in -current? Old way with RTHREADS kernel option and ln -s librthread doesn't work anymore. Are you trying to make it hard to help you? Imprecise description of what you did; *no* description

azalia

2008-05-02 Thread x72eme
it seems that xmms has resampling logic(just as faq claimed :)) and successfully plays mp3 and flac files after complaining about: **warning**:/dev/audio:cannot handle 44100Hz(invalid argument) -it seems my device is locked at 48000Hz everything else works great, thx to all developers p.s. i

Re: Problems with 4.1 PHP5 modules

2008-05-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-05-02, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: phpxs As all are script files, it's fairly simple, but, again, they should check for -d and -f instead of forcing users to make manual changes. If anyone has suggestions for implementation, I will try to work through some of the

Re: -current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Maxim Belooussov
Hi, How to enable rthreads in -current? Old way with RTHREADS kernel option and ln -s librthread doesn't work anymore. Are you trying to make it hard to help you? Imprecise description of what you did; *no* description of how the results differ from your expectations. My

Re: -current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Maxim Belooussov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 2 computers, thinkpad T42 (i386) and sun ultra 10 (sparc64). Both are running current. I've tried to check in the kernel configuration files (GENERIC) where I can enable RTHREADS option, but couldn't find

About the WPA support on Soekris HW

2008-05-02 Thread bbee
Hi, so a few hours ago I was trying for the Nth time to debug the crappy Windows IPSEC client I had settled on using (sleep/hibernation issues), so I thought I'd check the lists to see if WPA was coming along.. It's rained cats and dogs before, right? .. Damien has gotten around to it!! So

Re: -current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Edd Barrett
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where did you get the patch from - mail? How did you get it on to your system - cut'n'paste? I'm gonna guess you have broken line-endings or other whitespace problems. Try patch -lC to ignore whitespace changes and test

Re: -current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Philip Guenther
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Maxim Belooussov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 2 computers, thinkpad T42 (i386) and sun ultra 10 (sparc64). Both are running current. I've tried to check in the kernel

Re: Buying 4.2 CD

2008-05-02 Thread Jon Radel
Monah Baki wrote: Why the 4.2 CD set is missing in https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order It's there now, down with the other past releases. --Jon Radel [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]

Re: -current and rthreads

2008-05-02 Thread Maxim Belooussov
Hi Philip, Chris, if it's not listed in GENERIC (even commented out) we don't really think it's ready to use. At all. If you do feel like testing (and maybe, just maybe, melting your entire system) ... it's not that hard to copy the GENERIC config and add RTHREADS. it's just another

Re: PF and states of connections with same src port

2008-05-02 Thread B A
I found this notes http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf.c?rev=1.559content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Will try upgrade (I'm running 4.1) and see 02.05.08, 20:21, Kian Mohageri [EMAIL PROTECTED]: States aren't purged immediately. Take a look at the timeout values,

acpidock status

2008-05-02 Thread Alexander Hall
Hi! What is the status of acpidock(4)? From source-changes@ etc I cannot tell if it's considered usable or highly experimental. I just got my ultrabase X6 but the kernel panics both on live insertion and booting while docked. (Kernel is GENERIC.MP + acpidock + bt*). I have not tried with

mutt 1.5.17p0 for 4.3

2008-05-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just tried installing mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz but it wants qdbm-1.8.75. qdbm-1.8.77 is on ftp sites (under 4.3) Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net

Re: mutt 1.5.17p0 for 4.3

2008-05-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-05-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just tried installing mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz but it wants qdbm-1.8.75. qdbm-1.8.77 is on ftp sites (under 4.3) You have somehow got a broken mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz. Which mirror, which arch? The i386 and amd64 packages I looked at are all ok.

Re: mutt 1.5.17p0 for 4.3

2008-05-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri May 2 17:09 , Stuart Henderson sent: On 2008-05-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] eone.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] eone.net wrote: Just tried installing mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz but it wants qdbm-1.8.75. qdbm-1.8.77 is on ftp sites (under 4.3) You have somehow got a broken mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz. Which

Re: mutt 1.5.17p0 for 4.3

2008-05-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri May 2 17:29 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: On Fri May 2 17:09 , Stuart Henderson sent: On 2008-05-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] eone.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] eone.net wrote: Just tried installing mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz but it wants qdbm-1.8.75. qdbm-1.8.77 is on ftp sites (under 4.3) You have

[SOLVED] Re: mutt 1.5.17p0 for 4.3

2008-05-02 Thread Michael
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:56:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri May 2 17:29 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: On Fri May 2 17:09 , Stuart Henderson sent: On 2008-05-02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] eone.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] eone.net wrote: Just tried installing mutt-1.5.17p0.tgz but it