On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:06:47PM -0400, Calomel wrote:
Joe,
We have used a CARP firewall (two machines in failover and not
load balancing) in front of a dozen ftp servers. We use 12 different
ip addresses in total. One ftp-proxy for each CARP interface and
forwarding the traffic to one of
I forgot to mention that both bridges will run i386
kernel.
If anyone with experience in this kind of setup
would like to comment, I would appreciate.
Regards,
Jose
--
See Exclusive Videos: 10th Annual Young Hollywood Awards
http://www.hollywoodlife.net/younghollywoodawards2008/
Hi,
Have someone running tv card with this chipset? I was looking throw google and
can't find useful info.I know,that it's not in HW supported list and dmesg
only detect it.
Thx
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd like to do is have my OBSD box to NAT on the tun device
(VPN tunnel). I.e., so I can use the VPN connection seamlessly from
any system on my home network.
basically you want to route your traffic encrypted to your
Hi
I did an upgrade (read reinstall) last week on a Dell PE830 server from
OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3. It is a 4.3 RELEASE std install, but a stable update of
kernel and userland from May 29.
The sensors worked ok in 4.2. In 4.3 it looks like this where the sensor info
is null..
[EMAIL
On 2008-06-05, Per-Olov Sjvholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did an upgrade (read reinstall) last week on a Dell PE830 server from
OpenBSD 4.2 to 4.3. It is a 4.3 RELEASE std install, but a stable update of
kernel and userland from May 29.
The sensors worked ok in 4.2. In 4.3 it looks like
Hi folks,
I haven't seen this mentioned on the mailing list, and
the man page doesn't tell, either, so hopefully it is
allowed to ask:
Does pciide support hot-swapping hard disks? (I've got a
ServerWorks HT-1000 SATA2 controller and the appropriate
disks.)
Regards
Harri
Hello, misc.
In pf.conf syntax there is a self keyword which means all addresses
assigned to all interfaces.
r1:/root# grep self /etc/pf.conf
table this_box persist { self }
r1:/root#
r1:/root# pfctl -T show -t this_box
10.1.1.1
10.3.3.3
127.0.0.1
r1:/root# ifconfig tun2 10.3.3.5
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:59:09PM +0400, Yuri Spirin wrote:
Hello, misc.
In pf.conf syntax there is a self keyword which means all addresses
assigned to all interfaces.
r1:/root# grep self /etc/pf.conf
table this_box persist { self }
r1:/root#
r1:/root# pfctl -T show -t this_box
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Yuri Spirin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to automatically update rules and tables containing
self keyword when interface address changes (like ($ext_if)
behaviour)? Did I missed something in manual?
depending on what you're trying to accomplish, some
* Jose Fragoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080604 09:04]:
Hi,
In OpenBSD 4.3, is there a way to find out via script the
current size of the spamd blacklist?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jose
--
Mail.com Autos- Powered by Oncars.com: Drive By Today!
http://www.oncars.com
man 8 spamdb
2008/6/5 Jim Razmus [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Jose Fragoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080604 09:04]:
Hi,
In OpenBSD 4.3, is there a way to find out via script the
current size of the spamd blacklist?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jose
--
Mail.com Autos- Powered by Oncars.com: Drive By Today!
I'm running OpenBSD as an IP less bridge between a DMZ and a protected
internet. The protection comes from using a set of pf rules on the
exterior interface of the bridge. My pf rules block all traffic on UDP/
67 and UDP/68 from traversing the bridge so I currently run two DHCP
servers, one
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:07:30PM +0200, Almir Karic wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Matt Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd like to do is have my OBSD box to NAT on the tun device
(VPN tunnel). I.e., so I can use the VPN connection seamlessly
from any system on my home
on OpenBSD fire.sporkton.com 4.3 GENERIC#698 i386
I have this pf.conf config, it does not work for vnc
ext_if=xl0
lawrence=10.0.0.17
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port vncweb - $lawrence
port vncweb
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port vnc - $lawrence port vnc
pass
Your pass rules need to reference the IP address after processing by
the rdr rule. So it should be passing traffic destined to '10.0.0.17'
See http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#filter for more info.
John
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 03:46:57PM -0700, Lord Sporkton wrote:
on OpenBSD
I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it
any name. Edit the kernel config file:
Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your
machine.
http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#customize
Why would someone want to do this? Is this nothing
Any that support the status line where the application thinks there is
an 80x24 terminal and some meta character tells the terminal to display
text after it in the status line, which looks like a 25th line below
the 80x24 terminal?
2008/6/5 Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it
any name. Edit the kernel config file:
Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your
machine.
http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#customize
Why would someone want
Screen?
On 6/5/08, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any that support the status line where the application thinks there is
an 80x24 terminal and some meta character tells the terminal to display
text after it in the status line, which looks like a 25th line below
the 80x24 terminal?
--
Sent
On 6/5/08, Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it
any name. Edit the kernel config file:
Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your
machine.
http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#customize
Jon wrote:
I usually name the kernel to the machine hostname, but you can give it
any name. Edit the kernel config file:
Remove any hardware related options that are not relevant to your
machine.
http://www.muine.org/~hoang/openpf.html#customize
Why would someone want to do this? Is
Hello all.
I have an OpenBSD box running as my firewall (v4.2, PPPoE with ATT over a
Netopia 2210). I am using pf to share the internet connection to the local
network, which is made up of two Mac laptops (one 10.5.3, one 10.4.6) and
one Mac Mini (10.5.3).
From the local network, I can connect
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Kareem Kazkaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an OpenBSD box running as my firewall (v4.2, PPPoE with ATT over a
Netopia 2210). I am using pf to share the internet connection to the local
network, which is made up of two Mac laptops (one 10.5.3, one 10.4.6) and
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 07:47:22PM -0700, Kareem Kazkaz wrote:
Hello all.
I have an OpenBSD box running as my firewall (v4.2, PPPoE with ATT over a
Netopia 2210). I am using pf to share the internet connection to the local
network, which is made up of two Mac laptops (one 10.5.3, one 10.4.6)
This was indeed an MTU issue. Although it may lower my TCP/IP throughput, I
used the pf.conf fix so that when I have guests I don't have to worry about
changing their MTUs as well.
Thanks a bunch for the suggestion!
--
View this message in context:
26 matches
Mail list logo
