On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:53:44PM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
| I am running an HP Vectra VL400 system under OpenBSD 4.4 beta 2007-07-11.
|
| When I attempt to connect using ssvnc from my windows box using the ssh
| option I am getting connection refused by server: Administratively
|
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:41:55 +0700, sonjaya wrote:
i have small ups seri APC / Back-UPS ES 525 , how to joint and control
with openbsd , i try using apc-upsd when test not working.
then i try nut but unknown driver.
if any sucsess story can share to me :)
Yes, but not with ports, this
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:47:40 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
I've an OpenBSD box that's been running postfix for a few
years, strictly as a send-only mta, and every night the
box gets rebooted. Every couple of months postfix does
not come up on reboot.
All that shows up in the logs is:
snip
On Sunday, July 20, 2008 1:45 AM Paul de Weerd wrote:
|On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:53:44PM -0600, Anathae Townsend wrote:
| | I am running an HP Vectra VL400 system under OpenBSD 4.4 beta
2007-07-11.
| |
| | When I attempt to connect using ssvnc from my windows box using the ssh
| | option I am
Tried your fix and the progress is that I'm now getting
'Jul 20 03:14:06 kendra sshd[23354]: error: connect to 127.0.0.1 port 5910
failed: Connection refused'
in authlog.
I think I have to look in the direction of the ssvnc people now... seems to
be a usage
Problem on my Vista box now.
On
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:44:04AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 7/19/08, Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[4] # mount -o softdep /dev/sd0a /mnt
[5] # dd if=/dev/arandom bs=1m of=/mnt/imagefile count=...
prepare to wait a few days... there is known plaintext at specific
I'd like to publicly thank all those who are contributing to this
thread -- the discussion is very informative.
I suggested initially creating the imagefile with
[5] # dd if=/dev/arandom bs=1m of=/mnt/imagefile count=...
Several people have commented on this from the perspective of
cryptographic
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:47:40 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
I've an OpenBSD box that's been running postfix for a few
years, strictly as a send-only mta, and every night the
box gets rebooted. Every couple of months postfix does
not come up on
On 2008-07-20, Anathae Townsend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried your fix and the progress is that I'm now getting
'Jul 20 03:14:06 kendra sshd[23354]: error: connect to 127.0.0.1 port 5910
failed: Connection refused'
in authlog.
I think I have to look in the direction of the ssvnc people
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:35 +0530
Amarendra Godbole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Aaron Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Nuno Magalhces
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it's rtfm and chest-thumping.
because here, many people
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:37:27 +0200
Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Shizzle Cash wrote:
On Jul 17, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
agreed. I barely can wait to see Ty Semaka artwork for 4.4. Definitively
it should include monkeys. And amoebas too.
I agree, monkeys
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 7:42 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanking Sea Monkeys, then: the oceanic analogue of fleas,
at least in the area of genital proportion ;-)
Dhu
lol. Looks like someone is selling new stuffs over the net:
http://www.cafepress.com/spankymm
Greetings:
Sorry for not using sendbug, but I wanted to get something out quickly
while I have a moment.
Summary: I have a jetway board with two interfaces. vr0 (external) and
ral0 (wireless access point). When I boot up a laptop that uses the
wireless access point, the jetway board panics. This
Update! The machine boots fine with 2GB and 4GB RAM.
Output from loading bsd from harddrive with 8GB RAM:
- snip -
uhci5: host controller process error
uhci5: host controller halted
ehci0: unrecoverable error, controller halted
echi0: blocking intrs 0x10
uhci2: host controller process error
Nuno,
I would highly suggest looking into Nginx. It is easy to build from
source and runs efficiently, using little memory or CPU time. Even
though it is a light web server compared to Apache, Nginx is able to
handle high traffic loads. The WordPress blogging system recently
converted all of its
Dear gentleman,
i am planning to install openbsd on a 64 bit intel dual core server.
But, i believe that openbsd plataform i386 runs only on 32 bit mode.
Which plataform should i choose from http://www.openbsd.org/plat.html
?
Thanks in advance.
John Nietzsche wrote:
Dear gentleman,
i am planning to install openbsd on a 64 bit intel dual core server.
But, i believe that openbsd plataform i386 runs only on 32 bit mode.
Which plataform should i choose from http://www.openbsd.org/plat.html
?
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
Which is
There is also a package of the stable version of nginx. If you need
features from the development version or want different modules than the
package then build from source. But why not use the existing
port/package if it suits you?
As for which light http server, it might be best to try out
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Calomel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nuno,
I would highly suggest looking into Nginx. It is easy to build from
source and runs efficiently, using little memory or CPU time. Even
though it is a light web server compared to Apache, Nginx is able to
handle high
lighttpd.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg Amsterdam
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Jonathan Thornburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... In contrast, an
initially-zeroed imagefile would be sparse, with most blocks not
actually allocated, so I'd need the freespace reserve to make
imagefile block allocation reasonably fast
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:19:05 +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
My suspicion is that syslogd has not yet finished
making the log socket and the postfix check that
happens at postfix start fails.
That shouldn't happen, because syslogd delays its exit until after
its log sockets have been
On 7/20/08, Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Afaik there are (can be?) collisions in images bigger than ~40GB because
of blowfishs block size.
Right. Unfortunately, the only online reference I could find
indicating the significance of this is wikipedia's talk (!) page for
birthday
On 7/20/08, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrong. if you write just one sector at the end, yes, you'll create a
sparse file. dd if=/dev/zero of=image.bin bs=64k will actually write
to each and every one of those sectors.
until you cp or tar it. :)
We need a Button.
Reminds me of the advert in Comic Books of my youth, for Sea Monkeys,
Maybe we need Puffy looking concerned, with Sea Monkeys facing away from the
perspective doing something that most Prudes would find offensive..
Nothing Obvious mind-you, just a perspective of backs of Sea
Stuart Henderson, on Sunday, July 20, 2008 at 4:40 AM wrote
On 2008-07-20, Anathae Townsend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried your fix and the progress is that I'm now getting
'Jul 20 03:14:06 kendra sshd[23354]: error: connect to 127.0.0.1 port
5910
failed: Connection refused'
in
Henning Brauer wrote:
lighttpd.
So far I am very happy with lighttpd, including running with PHP via FastCGI.
I don't really trust the PHP applications I run, so they operate in a
separate chroot (via spawn-php.sh) as a separate user in addition to lighttpd
itself being chroot as a
* Henning Brauer wrote:
lighttpd.
can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting -
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:58:11AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
This might be a good time to try my giant softraid diff that makes
crypto useful.
Hello Marco,
Greatly appreciate your work on softraid(4). I've decided to play around
with Crypto discipline w/ softraid, created 60GB partition
I'm trying to setup a machine running KDE. it's supposed to look
pretty (no need for console), so I want kdm. xdm isn't pretty enough,
and lacks the shutdown option which is a must.
First, I tried running kdm from the command line. Kind of worked, but
when I logged in, no matter what session I
--- On Sat, 7/12/08, Charles Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Charles Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: neomagic and the needs-update entries
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Saturday, July 12, 2008, 6:09 PM
Good afternoon!
In xenocara/MODULES file a needs-update entry,
eg by neomagic,
can
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:22:24PM -0700, Aaron Stellman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 11:58:11AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
This might be a good time to try my giant softraid diff that makes
crypto useful.
Hello Marco,
Greatly appreciate your work on softraid(4). I've decided to
I've had kdm/kde on my laptop running for a couple of releases and I
recall having keyboard problems initially; now it just works.
2008/7/20, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
just an xterm. This was fixed by running genkdmconf which did some
stuff. I don't know why this was needed.
it builds
Ted Unangst wrote:
I'm trying to setup a machine running KDE. it's supposed to look
pretty (no need for console), so I want kdm. xdm isn't pretty enough,
and lacks the shutdown option which is a must.
First, I tried running kdm from the command line. Kind of worked, but
when I logged in, no
2008/7/20, Predrag Punosevac [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am not running it but I thought that this was more or less correct
way
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html
step 2.2-2.6 should do the trick. the rest of the document, i find,
is just plain confusing
Having myself a bit of a problem that the man pages haven't helped me
figure out. Running 4.3-RELEASE(amd64) with an Areca 1220 host
controller, I'm trying to bring a 5T RAID-5 array online (nothing but
samba storage, everything OS lives on sd0). In the dmesg, the
card+array show up thus
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:24:14PM +0200, Mark Prins wrote:
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/KDM.html
step 2.2-2.6 should do the trick.
And that's what? I don't see something called 2.2-2.6 there (but
I'm old and lazy and I don't understand those HOWTOs).
the rest of the document, i find,
is
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:04:57PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
Why do you think that discussing problems with packages constitutes
whining? Are the developers now supposed to get feedback from the user
community by divination?
please go read your original post.
is that useful feedback or
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Aaron Stellman wrote:
Now, on boot, the softraid0 doesn't attach itself to sd0n, perhaps not
implemented yet? I was wondering if there were any plans to create
support for crypto devices so that they could be mounted on boot as
specified in fstab(5).
Yes, but someone
My home network. Firewall is openbsd (4.3). DSL setup with PPPOE (in
kernel):
cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev dc0 authproto pap \
authname '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' authkey 'password' up
!/sbin/route add default
#
Here is my /etc/pf.conf
I stand corrected then =)
However, while trying to salvage some files, I do remember that some
info about the file was zeroed. It really wasn't the whole file data,
but something related to blocks and/or inodes, like data that leads to
the actual data, if that makes sense...
Anyway, I couldn't
Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
My home network. Firewall is openbsd (4.3). DSL setup with PPPOE (in
kernel):
cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0
inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \
pppoedev dc0 authproto pap \
authname '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' authkey 'password' up
!/sbin/route add
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:06:39PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
my /etc/hostname.sk0 looks like:
inet 75.44.229.1 255.255.255.248 NONE
alias 75.44.229.2 255.255.255.248
Unrelated, but use 255.255.255.255 for your alias netmask.
MY PROBLEM: Whenever I am on my home network and I try
Have you tried doing a tcpdump on fxp0
and pflog0 while trying to access the
web server on home firewall? Might give
you clues.
Srikant.
i have success build OpenBSD 4.3 ISO using floppy43.fs, and after testing, this
iso work perfectly.
but when i build OpenBSD 4.3 ISO using cd43.iso, my ISO can't boot, i have
using options -no-emul-boot because this file to large.
it's possibel to using cd43.iso when make OpenBSD 4.3 ISO file?
45 matches
Mail list logo
