Hi folks,
In the example for the rdr-to and nat-to combination in
the pf FAQs it seems that the http traffic is redirected
back through the incoming interface:
pass in on $int_if proto tcp from $int_net to $ext_if port 80 \
rdr-to $server
pass out on $int_if proto tcp to $server port 80 \
Hi list,
I have an question. I want my pc (i.e admin_pc) to be able to traceroute
which is behind a OpenBSD 4.8 pf firewall ( Doing NAT). So , I have added
below rules in pf.conf file.
match out on $ext_if from $lan_net nat-to ($ext_if)
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:32:21PM -0800, Scott Stanley wrote:
b. have been on this list for a while and totally disregarded the
culture you were within.
grepping my mailbox it looks this is the case. Although he might be just a
troll.
either:
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admin_pc to !$int_if \
port 33433 33626 keep state tag mytracert
pass out log on $ext_if inet proto udp from $ext_if to any \
port 33433 33626 keep state tagged mytracert
or:
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:47:20PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
my question is that How can I exclude my firewall from being able to doing
it ?
I'm really not sure why you don't want the firewall to be able to
traceroute. (hint: if you can't trust the users on your firewall to
behave
l...@animata.net (David Gwynne), 2011.01.20 (Thu) 10:20 (CET):
either:
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admin_pc to !$int_if \
port 33433 33626 keep state tag mytracert
pass out log on $ext_if inet proto udp from $ext_if to any \
port 33433 33626 keep state tagged
* Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de [2011-01-20 09:18]:
Hi folks,
In the example for the rdr-to and nat-to combination in
the pf FAQs it seems that the http traffic is redirected
back through the incoming interface:
pass in on $int_if proto tcp from $int_net to $ext_if port 80 \
Hi folks,
are the rdr-to and nat-to options in pass rules as sticky
as for match rules?
Sample:
pass in on $ext_if from any to 1.2.3.0/24 port 80 tag MYTAG rdr-to $host_a
pass in on $ext_if from any to 1.2.3.42 port 80
AFAIU traffic to 1.2.3.42 port 80 would be tagged with MYTAG.
Would it be
Hi,
I use OpenBSD 4.7, and so Sendmail MTA 8.14.3
I enabled TLS using good manpages : starttls. It's ok.
But now, i want to enable AUTH for smtp.
How can i achieve that ?
Thank you very much.
Wesley M.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:51:34 +0100
Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de wrote:
Hi folks,
are the rdr-to and nat-to options in pass rules as sticky
as for match rules?
No, match is what makes the options sticky.
They are not sticky by themselfs.
Sample:
pass in on $ext_if from any to
* Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de [2011-01-20 11:55]:
are the rdr-to and nat-to options in pass rules as sticky
as for match rules?
no. as outlined in the mnapage.
Of course I checked the man page, but it didn't tell.
blasphemia. of course it does.
match
The packet is
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 20:16:28 -0800, Edward Martinez
mindbende...@live.com wrote:
On 01/19/11 18:27, Korey Kaczor wrote:
The netgear and linksys are realtek 8169 devices
However, many of these companies may sneak different chipset. the
following link
shows a picture form newegg of a
anyway, Thanks for enlightening me.
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admin_pc to !$int_if \
port 33433 33626 keep state tag mytracert
pass out log on $ext_if inet proto udp from $ext_if to any \
port 33433 33626 keep state tagged mytracert
the above 2 rules were
pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admin_pc to !$int_if \
port 33433 33626 keep state
pass out log on $ext_if inet proto udp from $ext_if to any \
port 33433 33626 keep state tagged mytracert received-on $int_if
I guess there is a ``tagged mytracert'' copy-paste
On 01/20/11 12:39, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Harald Dunkel harald.dun...@aixigo.de [2011-01-20 11:55]:
Of course I checked the man page, but it didn't tell.
blasphemia. of course it does.
match
The packet is matched. This mechanism is used to provide fine
Hi Wes,
On 01/20/11 12:27, OpenBSD Geek wrote:
Hi,
I use OpenBSD 4.7, and so Sendmail MTA 8.14.3
I enabled TLS using good manpages : starttls. It's ok.
But now, i want to enable AUTH for smtp.
How can i achieve that ?
Thank you very much.
Maybe this helps:
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/auth.html
OpenBSD Geek open...@e-solutions.re 20.01.2011 12:27
Hi,
I use OpenBSD 4.7, and so Sendmail MTA 8.14.3
I enabled TLS using good manpages : starttls. It's ok.
But now, i want to enable AUTH for smtp.
How can i achieve that ?
Thank you very much.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 03:27:15PM +0400, OpenBSD Geek wrote:
Hi,
I use OpenBSD 4.7, and so Sendmail MTA 8.14.3
I enabled TLS using good manpages : starttls. It's ok.
But now, i want to enable AUTH for smtp.
How can i achieve that ?
Thank you very much.
Wesley M.
install the
Offerta super:
Scheda Video Palit GT430 1GB solo euro 42,68, se ne prendete minimo 10, il
prezzo h di 41.77; sempre piy iva e trasporto.
Approfittatene.
Vegastore S.r.l.
Hello list!
I hope this message finds you all well.
Ive been spending some time today trying to figure out how to get NFS
working under OpenBSD with the shiny new LDAPD daemon.
As far as I can tell, I have LDAPD working as intended, but I would welcome
it if someone could give my config files a
tor 2011-01-20 klockan 14:31 + skrev Timothy Legge:
Hello list!
I hope this message finds you all well.
Ive been spending some time today trying to figure out how to get NFS
working under OpenBSD with the shiny new LDAPD daemon.
As far as I can tell, I have LDAPD working as
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net wrote:
From: SJP Lists sjp.li...@flashbsd.net
Subject: Re: Please help me decide: OpenWrt vs. OpenBSD
To: S Mathias
Hello, is there any plans to make BGPD to work with recursive multipath?
Current implementation doesnt allow this, it forwards traffic only from one
link.
to achive load-sharing between 2 links, i have announced default route from
ISP's OSPF and i filtering the bgp prefixes to receive none,
so
S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com writes:
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
I use OpenBSD for desktop (laptop) as well as other settings, unless
there is a specific reason to drag in something else. The 'firewall
os' is a lot more capable in desktop/laptop space than
On 1/19/2011 8:16 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
On 01/19/11 18:27, Korey Kaczor wrote:
The Netgear and Linksys are Realtek 8169 devices
However, many of these companies may sneak different chipset.
The following link.
Just like Dell... Found out the hard way that they will change
On 20 January 2011 11:18, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I just
can't decide what to put on it:
Use mikrotik - as they manufacture the product, test and integrate it
MikrotikOS (which is linux with a bunch of custom
On 01/20/11 12:07, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
S Mathiassmathias1...@yahoo.com writes:
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
I use OpenBSD for desktop (laptop) as well as other settings, unless
there is a specific reason to drag in something else. The 'firewall
os'
CURSO TALLER
El Credito y la Cobranza... Una Actividad de Exito.
Duracion: (1 dia) 10 hrs.
Inversion: $4,400 pesos mas IVA
Objetivo: Conocer por medio de practicas vivenciales las razones por las
que una empresa tiene ixito al
dear, I found a good company several days ago, and try to buy some goods,
and I received satisfactory item 5 days later.
Introducing to you: fallinele.com , maybe also useful for you.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
I used to, for about 2 months. But then I realized that my internet
lifestyle is too accustomed to flash to pretend I
On 2011-01-19, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I just
can't decide what to put on it:
OpenWrt or
OpenBSD
RB450G? OpenBSD, please. Send the diffs you use to tech@.
On 2011-01-20, Mindless Gr nomindles...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello, is there any plans to make BGPD to work with recursive multipath?
Current implementation doesnt allow this, it forwards traffic only from one
link.
to achive load-sharing between 2 links, i have announced default route from
On 2011-01-19, Alastair Johnson att...@gmail.com wrote:
We also have a very similar question. I have a pair of CARP'd pfsync'd
firewalls of embarrasing vintage and would like to be able to swap them for
new 4.8 machines (new hardware) one at a time. Is this possible?
pfsync on a firewall of
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011-01-19, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I just
can't decide what to put on it:
OpenWrt or
OpenBSD
RB450G? OpenBSD, please. Send
I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I just
can't decide what to put on it:
OpenWrt or
OpenBSD
Depends mainly on whether yo mama so fat.
On 20 January 2011 16:42, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
It's been my preferred OS desktop since 2.9, and since I changed jobs
its now my work desktop :~)
Hi there
I have a strange problem with network connectivity on a device of mine.
The setup is carp on vlan on vr(4).
The problem is that the link runs for 10minutes, 10hours or 10days and
suddenly it stops working. Doing a ifconfig vr0 down ; ifconfig vr0 up
solves the problem temporarly but as
On 1/20/11 1:32 PM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stuart Hendersons...@spacehopper.org wrote:
[stuff]
it took a full 8 replies to get to the correct response?
now I understand why enlightened people find misc@ complete noise with
negligible signal.
I find the
On 20 January 2011 16:42, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
All my desktops and laptops run OpenBSD. As a matter of fact the
desktops and laptops of all my students also run OpenBSD:-)
On 21/01/2011, at 10:32 AM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stuart Henderson
s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2011-01-19, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I
just can't decide what to put on it:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011, S Mathias wrote:
What is more secure/reliable in this case?
OpenWrt or OpenBSD?
Anyone got any opinions? What should i choose?
OpenBSD. If you ask in OpenWrt mailing list, they will tell you the
same, for sure.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Predrag Punosevac
punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 January 2011 16:42, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
All my desktops and laptops run OpenBSD. As
On Friday, 21 January 2011, Aaron Glenn aaron.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2011-01-19, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a RouterBoard 450G [680 Mhz cpu, 256 MB ram, 512 MB flash]. I just
can't decide
Hi lists, I just wrote a new document about how to build a port for OpenBSD.
Enjoy it!
note: Only in spanish! (sorry)
Download the PDF:
https://groups.google.com/group/openbsd-colombia/browse_thread/thread/30c4b800a5cfc868#
--
--
Fernando Quintero
http://www.openbsdcolombia.org/
On 20/01/11 22:47, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Predrag Punosevac
punoseva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 January 2011 16:42, S Mathias smathias1...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've been using OpenBSD since 2.5, '99.
Does anyone using OpenBSD as a Desktop OS? :O you do? :O wow.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:47:20PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
my question is that How can I exclude my firewall from being able to
doing
it ?
I'm really not sure why you don't want the firewall to be able to
Am 21.01.2011 00:38, schrieb Andre Keller:
I have a strange problem with network connectivity on a device of mine.
The setup is carp on vlan on vr(4).
The problem is that the link runs for 10minutes, 10hours or 10days and
suddenly it stops working. Doing a ifconfig vr0 down ; ifconfig vr0 up
47 matches
Mail list logo
