Greetings - As courtesy we wanted to remind you to join us at our Grant
Development Workshop at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
February 2 - 4, 2011. Learn from Professional Grant Writers how to
prepare write and secure grant proposals from Various funding agencies.
We are
Hi,
Im looking for a webmail for my mailserver (no SQL database, host
only one domain).
Any idea ?
Thank you very much.
Wesley M.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 08:06:09PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:28:51 -0500
Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com wrote:
tounge in cheek flame
I've got to say I'm suprised the dns server in the base system of the
worlds most secure OS is not able to validate dnssec responses
On asus eeepc 1005PX acpiec fails to load, so a lot of acpi-related
stuff fails.
Most notably I have to disable acpitz to use the computer, but acpibat
does not work and (un)plugging the AC adapter cause a hard reboot.
Also, I have a lot of splassert: assertwaitok: want -1 have 1 when
On 24-01-2011 10:44, OpenBSD Geek wrote:
Im looking for a webmail for my mailserver (no SQL database, host
only one domain).
http://www.noupe.com/ajax/10-ajax-webmail-clients.html
Some require a database, some don't.
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:44:33 +0400
OpenBSD Geek open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
Hi,
Im looking for a webmail for my mailserver (no SQL database, host
only one domain).
Any idea ?
Thank you very much.
Wesley M.
You would do good to search the mailinglist archives before posting.
Hi,
During the weekend I started having issues where traffic going to and thru
OBSD PF is dropped. After doing some digging it seems that the packets are
dropped due to too fast timestamp incrementing. I have tested connecting to
the OBSD machine itself via SSH from a phone (using putty) and that
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:10, emigrant emig...@gmail.com wrote:
ipfm dont work well in openbsd 4.6/4.7/4.8, too much changes in pf?(yes, i
use pfaltq+hfsc), any ideas what can i do? go back to 4.5? :)
People here are unlikely to recommend going back in OpenBSD versions.
From the first Google
* Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com [2011-01-24 11:56]:
The tcp option in resolv.conf might be reasonable for a single workstation
but due to the protocol overhead not appropriate for larger networks / many
clients.
people keep claiming this bullshit. remains bullshit.
--
Henning Brauer,
On Jan 24, 2011, at 6:44 PM, OpenBSD Geek wrote:
Im looking for a webmail for my mailserver (no SQL database, host
only one domain).
Any idea ?
Roundcube webmail is pretty cool, available in ports tree:
mail/roundcubemail
http://openports.se/mail/roundcubemail
--
Zhang Huangbin
- Open
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:38:58 +0800, Zhang Huangbin wrote:
On Jan 24, 2011, at 6:44 PM, OpenBSD Geek wrote:
Im looking for a webmail for my mailserver (no SQL database, host
only one domain).
Any idea ?
Roundcube webmail is pretty cool, available in ports tree:
mail/roundcubemail
On Monday, January 24, 2011, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com [2011-01-24 11:56]:
The tcp option in resolv.conf might be reasonable for a single workstation
but due to the protocol overhead not appropriate for larger networks / many
clients.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:33:53PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com [2011-01-24 11:56]:
The tcp option in resolv.conf might be reasonable for a single workstation
but due to the protocol overhead not appropriate for larger networks / many
clients.
people
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:52:59AM -0500, Josh Smith wrote:
On Monday, January 24, 2011, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com [2011-01-24 11:56]:
The tcp option in resolv.conf might be reasonable for a single workstation
but due to the protocol
Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the tcp option in resolv.conf looks great and I'll be enabling
it on my obsd clients but, correct me if I am wrong, this will do
little to help protect the non obsd clients using my recursive
resolvers.
You can use IPsec to protect the
Dear folks,
I find that there are primarily 4 ways to
aggregate/concentrate/failover WAN links.
1) trunk(4)
2) ECMP(read FAQ)
3) pf(4) route-to
4) relayd(8) Router
5) BGP
I say 4 since BGP cannot be used in most cases.
Which is the best way to achieve this goal in our usual approach of
Esto es una parte del texto del mensaje.
Este se muestra para los usuarios de antiguos clientes de e-mail
Comprobado el: 24/01/2011 10:37:09 a.m.
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
http://www.avast.com
I've searching an sniffer detector for a LAN in OpenBSD unsucessfully,
but found Sniffdet (outdated) and doesn't compile on
OpenBSD4.8 and in all packages I dont know if there is one, any suggestions
about this?
I need to detect sniffers on my network possibly from Linux or or Windows
=
nbsp;
LAMINAS PARA CONTROL SOLAR
nbsp;
instalamos en: Casas, Locales, Oficinas, Barrios Privados, Depar=
tamentos,
Obras.
Abone con TARJETA DE CREDITO , consulte
financiacioacute;n.Presupuestos al inst= ante. Solicite
asesoramiento:
(011) 3531-1755 /
Try http://openports.se
Use sniff and sniffer as the search queries.
No hay nadie acerca de usted que esta usando OpenBSD. Disculpa mi pobre
Castiliano.
Talvez son gente en Mexico o Colombia.
Ja tente, and use the search above.
--- On Mon, 1/24/11, Orestes Leal R.
I realize after I sent the note that my Spanish was completely screwed.
My apologies.
Here.
Is there anyone close to you that uses openbsd or anyone you know in a
neighboring country?
I referenced Mexico and Colombia because help from native speakers may be more
efficient.
--- On Mon, 1/24/11,
See ftp://ftp3.usa.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/doc/pf-faq.txt;,
especially the part about
Redirection and Reflection.
I've read that, and Split-horizon DNS isn't really applicable. However,
on two other points, I'm not so sure of:
1. TCP proxying seems like it might be overkill. I'd like to
Actually I understand everything friend don't worry, TODO BIEN!
Here in Cuba almost no one uses openbsd.
Thanks a lot,
LeaL
I realize after I sent the note that my Spanish was completely screwed.
My apologies.
Here.
Is there anyone close to you that uses openbsd or anyone you know in a
* Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com [2011-01-24 15:13]:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:33:53PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Oliver Peter li...@peter.de.com [2011-01-24 11:56]:
The tcp option in resolv.conf might be reasonable for a single workstation
but due to the protocol overhead not
On 01/23/11 14:47, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or ramfs? ], and
put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to write in the
/etc/fstab?
I would like to collect the [ answers too:P ]:
Advantages:
- Memory is way faster
On 01/24/11 20:42, Alexander Hall wrote:
On 01/23/11 14:47, kellyremo wrote:
to memory means: mounting a ~2 GByte filesystem [ tmpfs?, or ramfs? ], and
put the /tmp on it. [ e.g.: 4 GByte ram in the pc ]. what to write in the
/etc/fstab?
I would like to collect the [ answers too:P ]:
Orestes Leal R. l...@cubacatering.avianet.cu writes:
Here in Cuba almost no one uses openbsd.
That only means there's huge scope for improvement :)
- Peter
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/
Je suis le fils de l'ancien ministre de la Guinie (Mariame Sy Diallo)
mais je vis actuellement en Angleterre, j'ai trouvi votre adresse ` la
chambre de commerce ici ` Londres, j'ai besoin de votre aide pour
investir au Maroc ou Algirie ou en Tunisie. Si vous jtes intiressi ` ma
demandes'il vous
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Josh Smith juice...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree the tcp option in resolv.conf looks great and I'll be enabling
it on my obsd clients but, correct me if I am wrong, this will do
little to help protect the non obsd clients using my recursive
resolvers.
It doesn't
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:13:47 -0500
Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com wrote:
TCP may help talking to a far away DNS server over the internet, but
honestly, that's an unusual scenario and better handled by a VPN.
Oy, thats where the automacigal transport layer ipsec from ipv6 enters
the stage,
Hello,
Are there some plans to implement netflow v9 in pflow(4) (to be able to
trace ipv6 flows)?
Without, which collector can I use in userland? And is the load
introduced by such userland tool a concern with a network traffic
passing the firewall around ~500Mb/s?
Thanks, regards.
On 11/28/10 14:12, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
I get the panic when unplugging either AC or bge0. The panic, trace and
ps are the same regardless of unplugging AC or bge0, but `mach ddbcpu 1`
fills the console with 'bge0: PHY read timed out' when unplugging bge0.
This is a HP 6730b, -current, clean
Hi Stuart,
Thanks a bunch for you suggestions. This email got lost in my inbox.
Will let you know if I have some questions. Appreciate your help :)
Thx
On 1/11/11 1:43 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010-12-03, Godesidabhee...@aim.com wrote:
relay web {
Try applying this diff from
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:05:01PM -0500, Josh Smith wrote:
Has anyone had any luck configuring the bind included with 4.7 (named
-v indicates it is 9.4.2-p2) as a DNSSEC validating resolver? Some
digging around the web indicates it might be to old to handle this
properly. If so is the version
On 01/23/2011 02:06 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:28:51 -0500
Josh Smithjuice...@gmail.com wrote:
tounge in cheek flame
I've got to say I'm suprised the dns server in the base system of the
worlds most secure OS is not able to validate dnssec responses
/tounge in cheek
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Corey clinge...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Debate indeed; it potentially creates new problems. B See here
(http://dnscurve.org/nsec3walker.html) and here
(http://dnscurve.org/amplification.html) for examples. B It's Dan
Bernstein's
writing, so it's definitely an
I was curious as to what would be the expected behaviour when attempting
to read or write to a bad sector on a drive?
I have been encountering hard lock-ups on an MacPPC 4.7 machine when
running rsync against another host. Whenever it reaches a certain file
the system would lock up to
On 24/01/2011 21:22, STeve Andre' wrote:
On 01/24/11 18:41, Martin Foster wrote:
I was curious as to what would be the expected behaviour when
attempting to read or write to a bad sector on a drive?
I have been encountering hard lock-ups on an MacPPC 4.7 machine when
running rsync against
On 01/24/11 18:41, Martin Foster wrote:
I was curious as to what would be the expected behaviour when
attempting to read or write to a bad sector on a drive?
I have been encountering hard lock-ups on an MacPPC 4.7 machine when
running rsync against another host. Whenever it reaches a certain
This will be corrected as new snaps go out. Building differently
didn't produce the same result as before, go figgure.
Penned by MERIGHI Marcus on 20110119 5:20.13, we have:
| hello all,
|
| just noticed that the SHA file is missing the checksums for the x*49.tgz
| files.
|
| bye,
|
|
$B?7$7$$%a!%k%%I%l%9$r$*CN$i$;$7$^$9?7$7$$%a!%k%%I%l%9!'(B
edithabe...@yahoo.co.jp
I am Mrs Edith Abed I am a cancer woman that have short time to live. I want to
make a donation to you.please a you ready to help me, i am awaiting for your
reply for more information Your Direct Tel Fax Your
41 matches
Mail list logo
