Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Nick Holland wrote:
>>>
On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote:
> System installed from a
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote:
>
> > Nick Holland wrote:
> > > On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote:
> > >
> > >> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less
> > >> th
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote:
> >
> >> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less
> >> than an hour ago...
> >>
> >
> > No, your process is broke.
> > Please read
Nick Holland wrote:
> On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote:
>
>> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less
>> than an hour ago...
>>
>
> No, your process is broke.
> Please read FAQ5.
> The part you definitely violated is 5.3.2
>
> Nick.
>
Thanks. Okay,
Hi,
I am testing various hardware processor, however I can't get one of each
type, money is not endless.
But I came across this statement for this Intel card:
Intel. EXPI9404PTL PCI-E PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Low Profile Server Adapter
"Additionally, the Intel PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Server Adapt
>> We've got same problems (on a routeur, not a firewall). Increasing
>> MAX_INTS_PER_SEC to 24000 increased bandwith and lowered packet loss.
>> Our cards are "Intel PRO/1000 (82576)" and "Intel PRO/1000 FP
>> (82576)".
>
>Did you try to increase the number of descriptor?
>#define EM_MAX_TXD 256
> pass out log(matches) quick inet proto tcp from any to 89.176.141.250 port =
> www rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port 8080
I think rdr-to is meant to be use on inbound rules.
id like to reiterate ryans advice to have a look at the systat mbuf output.
as he said, mclgeti will try to protect the host by restricting the number of
packets placed on the rx rings. it turns out you dont need (or cant use) a lot
of packets on the ring, so bumping the ring size is a useless twe
On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote:
> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less
> than an hour ago...
No, your process is broke.
Please read FAQ5.
The part you definitely violated is 5.3.2
Nick.
Thus said Joe Snikeris on Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:03:06 EST:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Andy Bradford
> wrote:
> >
> > Also, I tried without RADEON_IS_MOBILITY (this isn't a laptop, but
> > maybe it actually uses the same code), but without it, the system
> > locks up hard and is complet
System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less
than an hour ago...
cc -O2 -pipe -g -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DTERMIOS
-DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_ERR -DNO_WINDOWS_BRAINDEATH -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA
-DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DOPENSSL_NO_GOST
I posted on the pf mailing list originally, but the very aggresive spam
filter will not allow me to post a follow-up. I guess there are some pf
users on this list also :)
My original post can be found here:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-pf&m=129740086511664&w=2
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Basical
http://www.mailinglist.fr/img2/mails_piedspage/ml_logo.gif"; width="570"
height="69" alt="MailingList.fr">
http://www.mailinglist.fr/img2/mails_piedspage/bg_tt_mail.gif);background-repeat:no-repeat;">http://www.mailinglist.fr/img2/fr/titre/tt_ml_confsub.gif";
style="margin-left:1
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:07:16PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> I log the congestion counter (each 10s) and there are at max 3 or 4
> congestions per day. I don't think the bottleneck is pf.
The congestion counter doesn't directly mean you have a bottleneck in
PF; it's triggered by the IP in
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be
displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message
correctly.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> Misc,
>
> After patching pcidevs (included below) I was able to get the kernel to
> recognize a Radeon HD 4850, however, attempts to run something that uses
> GL result in the following errors:
>
> $ xlock -nolock -mode random -modelist allg
W dniu 2011-02-24 12:11, Patrick Lamaiziere pisze:
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:09:18 +0100,
Manuel Guesdon a icrit :
| Did you try to increase the number of descriptor?
| #define EM_MAX_TXD 256
| #define EM_MAX_RXD 256
|
| I've tried up to 2048 (and with MAX_INTS_PER_SEC = 16000) but it
looks | wo
[IMAGE] 1 anexo(s)
Documento-Relatorio.doc (148,4 KB)
Segue em anexo o relatorio.
tenha um bom dia.
Jan Stary wrote:
> I am currently using an M-Audio MobilePre (as kindly suggested
> by Alexander Ratchov some months ago). It works fine and the
> sound is very good.
>
> Now I consider upgrading to the new version of MobilePre
> http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/MobilePre.html
> which can do
On 02/24/2011 01:50 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
>> http://www.startssl.com/
>> Why pay if you can have one for free trusted by every major browser?
>> Sure, the "class 2" ones are pay-for, but the free one works as well as
>> a self-signed one (except for the "CA sells out like paypal" idea, which
>>
On 02/24/11 17:50, Chris Bennett wrote:
>> http://www.startssl.com/
>> Why pay if you can have one for free trusted by every major browser?
>> Sure, the "class 2" ones are pay-for, but the free one works as well as
>> a self-signed one (except for the "CA sells out like paypal" idea, which
>> I adm
Hello there,
Someone use comixwall ?
Please contact me
Regards,
> http://www.startssl.com/
> Why pay if you can have one for free trusted by every major browser?
> Sure, the "class 2" ones are pay-for, but the free one works as well as
> a self-signed one (except for the "CA sells out like paypal" idea, which
> I admit is possible, though, in the US, the govern
On 02/24/2011 11:59 AM, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I am going to point out another factor in my reasoning:
> Basically, there is no reason to assume that my self-signed certificate is
> any less secure than paying someone who is in a browsers root certificates.
>
> As a contractor in construction, on
I am going to point out another factor in my reasoning:
Basically, there is no reason to assume that my self-signed certificate is any
less secure than paying someone who is in a browsers root certificates.
As a contractor in construction, one article I wrote for my potential customers
is how to
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:16:36 +0100
Marc Espie wrote:
> the fact that most people reuse the same password,
You hear about that now said to be non existent security firm that was
helping the fbi track down a support group of wkileaks called anonymous
and ended up with all their email on wikileaks b
DVDs DidC!cticos
www.cuidardobebe.com
www.socorroinfantil.com
www.linguagestual.com
www.curso1socorros.com
www.origamicurso.com
InformaC'C5es gerais
Se recebeu por engano ou deseja deixar de receber as newsletters de
cursos da ValorVisual, Lda. envie-nos um email para ge...@valorvisual.pt,
(
Hello,
it's probably PEBKAC but I'm lost where is the problem.
I try to redirect specific outgoing traffic to a local port, it
doesn't work if 'set skip on lo' is used.
I'm using i386 snapshot from Feb 11.
Any idea? Thank you.
jirib
** pf rules:
set skip on lo
pass# to establish
Le Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:09:18 +0100,
Manuel Guesdon a icrit :
> >| Did you try to increase the number of descriptor?
> >| #define EM_MAX_TXD 256
> >| #define EM_MAX_RXD 256
> >|
> >| I've tried up to 2048 (and with MAX_INTS_PER_SEC = 16000) but it
> >looks | worth.
>
> Thank you ! I'll investig
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:57:26AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
| > and even that does not work. It seems like my ~/.mailcap is ignored.
| > (Copying to /etc/mailcap doesn't seem to make any difference.)
| >
| > Does anyone have a hint of what could be causing this?
|
| text/html is usually in
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11:22AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Feb 09 17:56:59, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -stdin -force_html -dump ; copiousoutput
>
> On Feb 09 10:59:54, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > text/html; /usr/local/bin/links -dump '%s'; copiousoutput; description=HTML
[IMAGE]
Se non sei ancora iscritto alla Newsletter di NanniMagazine clicca QUI
< /TR>
Facebook: Facebook Diventa Fan RSS: d Sottoscrivi gli RSS
Newsletter Nr. 16 del 22 Febbraio 2011
Le altre rubriche:
Cronaca Italia
Carcere
Giustizia e criminalita'
Immigrazione
Sicurezza
[IMAGE]
I think your guys are into elaborate schemes and totally forgetting low-level
tech/social engineering attack.
Remember that most people out there don't understand https, they will just see
that little lock and think "I'm secure"... yeah, sure, from 3rd party. But
it's so easy to set up a fake site
On Feb 09 17:56:59, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> text/html; /usr/bin/lynx -stdin -force_html -dump ; copiousoutput
On Feb 09 10:59:54, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> text/html; /usr/local/bin/links -dump '%s'; copiousoutput; description=HTML
> Text; na metemplate=%s.html
On Feb 09 23:12:27, Igor Zinovik wro
TrC"n trá»ng kCnh chC o quC= khC!ch vC thC nh tháºt xin lá»i nếu email nC
y
lC m phiá»n quC= khC!ch.
ChC:ng tC4i xin Äược giá»i thiá»u Äến quC= khC!ch website
www.topwebsites.vn , má»t website vC4 cC9ng hữu dụng cho viá»c lÆ°á»t
net của
quC= khC!ch.
* Danh sC!ch củ
Misc,
After patching pcidevs (included below) I was able to get the kernel to
recognize a Radeon HD 4850, however, attempts to run something that uses
GL result in the following errors:
$ xlock -nolock -mode random -modelist allgl
drmRadeonCmdBuffer: -22. Kernel failed to parse or rejected comma
36 matches
Mail list logo
