Re: Setting up default boot from a wd0d

2011-06-27 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On 06/24/11 16:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote: Hello list users, I have a virtual server for testing, on which I have installed OpenBSD 4.8. The installation is on wd0a, and there's just a single / partition. I then did a second installation, and setup OpenBSD 4.9 on wd0d, also with a single /

Re: OpenBSD's choosing of a boot device -- scd

2011-06-27 Thread Frédéric Perrin
Hello Ted, Ted Unangst ted.unan...@gmail.com writes: 2011/6/26 Fridiric Perrin f...@resel.fr: I'm currently toying with OpenBSD's boot process. I see in arch/i386/stand//libsa/dev_i386.c:bdevs that one can boot from a an scd device. However, `apropos scd' doesn't tell me anything Some kind

openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread Friedrich Locke
Dear list member, i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for disk information report. It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata device. Why does it (OpenBSD) see it as an old wd. Thanks in advance.

Re: openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread Rod Whitworth
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:31:43 -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote: Dear list member, i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for disk information report. It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata device. Yep, and the old one is pata. So they

Re: openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread David Coppa
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list member, i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for disk information report. It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata device. Why does it

Re: openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread David Gwynne
On 27/06/2011, at 9:31 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote: Dear list member, i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for disk information report. It is showed as wd0. I am confused because as far as i know it is a sata device. Why does it (OpenBSD) see it as an old wd.

Re: openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:44:39PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Dear list member, i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing is ok, expect for disk information report. It is showed as wd0. I am

Re: openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 13:54:32 +0200 (+0200), Otto Moerbeek wrote: :On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:44:39PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: : : On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke : friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote: : Dear list member, : : i have installed OpenBSD on my desktop; every thing

Re: openbsd hard disk information

2011-06-27 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote: On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 13:54:32 +0200 (+0200), Otto Moerbeek wrote: :On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 01:44:39PM +0200, David Coppa wrote: : : On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Friedrich Locke : friedrich.lo...@gmail.com wrote: : Dear

Re: Setting up default boot from a wd0d

2011-06-27 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote: On 06/24/11 16:51, Anand Buddhdev wrote: Hello list users, I have a virtual server for testing, on which I have installed OpenBSD 4.8. The installation is on wd0a, and there's just a single / partition. I then

Re: Setting up default boot from a wd0d

2011-06-27 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 27 June 2011 04:46, Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote: Hello Nick, I then did a second installation, and setup OpenBSD 4.9 on wd0d, also with a single / partition. bad. Why is this bad? What's wrong with having 2 OpenBSD installations on a single disk? it's an

Re: Setting up default boot from a wd0d

2011-06-27 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 14:32:47 +0200 (+0200), Anand Buddhdev wrote: :My scenario is that I have a small Soekris board running an older OpenBSD :(installed on a CF card). : :I'd like to upgrade to a newer OpenBSD without overwriting the current setup :(to use as a fallback in case something is

aucat(1) mixing streams from different users

2011-06-27 Thread Jona Joachim
Hi, I start mpd and aucat with default settings using rc scripts. aucat thus runs as user _sndio and mpd runs as _mpd. Access to sndio between mpd and programs running as a different user are mutually exclusive, so when mpd is playing music nothing else can access the sound device. According to

Re: Setting up default boot from a wd0d

2011-06-27 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On 27 June 2011 14:40, Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org wrote: On 2011 Jun 27 (Mon) at 14:32:47 +0200 (+0200), Anand Buddhdev wrote: :My scenario is that I have a small Soekris board running an older OpenBSD :(installed on a CF card). : :I'd like to upgrade to a newer OpenBSD without

Re: aucat(1) mixing streams from different users

2011-06-27 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Hi, I start mpd and aucat with default settings using rc scripts. aucat thus runs as user _sndio and mpd runs as _mpd. Access to sndio between mpd and programs running as a different user are mutually exclusive, so when mpd is

Re: Setting up default boot from a wd0d

2011-06-27 Thread Nick Holland
On 06/27/2011 08:32 AM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: On 27 June 2011 04:46, Nick Hollandn...@holland-consulting.net wrote: Hello Nick, I then did a second installation, and setup OpenBSD 4.9 on wd0d, also with a single / partition. bad. Why is this bad? What's wrong with having 2 OpenBSD

Re: aucat(1) mixing streams from different users

2011-06-27 Thread Jona Joachim
On 2011-06-27, Alexandre Ratchov a...@caoua.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 02:42:42PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Hi, I start mpd and aucat with default settings using rc scripts. aucat thus runs as user _sndio and mpd runs as _mpd. Access to sndio between mpd and programs running as a

parameter scope in bourne vs ksh functions

2011-06-27 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hi, ksh(1) states this: Functions defined with the function reserved word are treated differently in the following ways from functions defined with the () notation: [...] o Parameter assignments preceding function calls are not kept in the shell environment (executing

Re: parameter scope in bourne vs ksh functions

2011-06-27 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de wrote: Hi, ksh(1) states this: Functions defined with the function reserved word are treated differently in the following ways from functions defined with the () notation: [...] o Parameter assignments

4.8 and 4.9 Panic on Supermicro P8SCi

2011-06-27 Thread listmail
Hi, At the end of May, there was discussion on the list regarding the panic related to interdrm when installing 4.8 or 4.9 on Supermicro P8SCi mobos. At the time, it looked like a fix was going to be checked in. I was hoping that a new ISO might be posted with this fix, but I don't see anything

Re: 4.8 and 4.9 Panic on Supermicro P8SCi

2011-06-27 Thread Nick Holland
On 06/27/2011 02:03 PM, listmail wrote: Hi, At the end of May, there was discussion on the list regarding the panic related to interdrm when installing 4.8 or 4.9 on Supermicro P8SCi mobos. At the time, it looked like a fix was going to be checked in. I was hoping that a new ISO might be

Re: parameter scope in bourne vs ksh functions

2011-06-27 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
On 06/27/11 17:49, Ted Unangst wrote: On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de wrote: Hi, ksh(1) states this: Functions defined with the function reserved word are treated differently in the following ways from functions defined with the () notation:

Re: splassert: assertwaitok: want -1 have 1

2011-06-27 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-05-21, Ed D. li...@rensseltucky.com wrote: I'm posting this because I haven't yet found a resolution ot this problem. From what I understand, this is fixed with this commit in -current - PatchSet 3072 Date: 2011/04/17 21:44:27 Author: stsp Branch: HEAD Tag: (none)

Re: parameter scope in bourne vs ksh functions

2011-06-27 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de wrote: Ok, I got it. But wtf? Thats creepy! Is there any rationale behind this strange bourne behaviour?!? I would guess historical accident or some quirk of the implementation. Then once it was discovered, it became

umount(8) by device + overloaded mountpoint is not catched

2011-06-27 Thread Christopher Zimmermann
Hi, when umount(8)ing by device, umount fetches the mountpoint via getmntinfo(3), because unmount(2) only supports unmounting via mountpoint. This means it is simply impossible to unmount a specific filesystem from an overloaded mountpoint. I think umount(8) should detect this case, warn the user

ZTE MF 180 USB modem

2011-06-27 Thread Jeff Ross
Hi, I have a friend in the Peace Corp in Morocco. He's using a ZTE MF 180 USB modem connecting with Maroc Telecom on his windows based Acer Netbook. I'm already sick of walking him through removing the latest windows 'sploit of the week, especially given that we do it through e-mail and

Raid configuration help.

2011-06-27 Thread Zeb Packard
Hello all, I'm new so if I do anything rude please let me know so I can adjust. I set up an openbsd file server using sftp, with a raid 1 configuration and failover with Carp. My plan was to use rsync to sync up the file sharing directories and I believe I got a little bit ahead of myself when I

Sistema Compranet 5.0 Actualizaciones y uso

2011-06-27 Thread Ana Garcia
[IMAGE] Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005 Smguenos en Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico Conozca de la mano de un experto el correcto uso de este sistema !No deje pasar oportunidades de Negocio! Manejo Sptimo del Sistema Compranet 5.0 29 de Junio

Sistema Compranet 5.0 Actualizaciones y uso

2011-06-27 Thread Adriana Hernandez
[IMAGE] Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005 Smguenos en Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de Mixico Conozca de la mano de un experto el correcto uso de este sistema !No deje pasar oportunidades de Negocio! Manejo Sptimo del Sistema Compranet 5.0 29 de Junio