Again, thank you
I know that an user very determined can do some things, but he don't know
what I can do with PF
People should be educated like you :)
Best regards and Thank you !
2011/7/28 roberth
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:39:20 -0300
> "R0me0 ***" wrote:
>
> > Yes is corporate organization,
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > pppoe0 has 92.203.101.134.
>> > this works fine:
>> >
>> > match out log on egress inet from 192.168.23.0/24 nat-to pppoe0
>> >
>> > tcpdump
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:39:20 -0300
"R0me0 ***" wrote:
> Yes is corporate organization, all employees are aware that a copy of
> sended and received email.
> All employees sign a document which they are aware. Here, in Brazil,
> since that exists a document, signed, it is valid, of course.
> Nothi
Hello Robert,
I appreciated your email:
I would like explain:
Yes is corporate organization, all employees are aware that a copy of sended
and received email.
All employees sign a document which they are aware. Here, in Brazil, since
that exists a document, signed, it is valid, of course.
Nothin
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:00:03 -0300
"R0me0 ***" wrote:
> when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and
> send a copy of this to another email account, it must be
> transparently to user.
bad juju!
sooo, you want to intercept email not destined for yourself.
you are asking ab
Mayorista de Remeras Gorras y Chombas publicitarias para su empresa u
organizacion
Maxima Calidad con el mejor precio del mercado. Contamos con gran stock
disponible. Atendemos pedidos urgentes
Nuestros productos no pierden color con los lavados, no se estiran ni se
despega el estampado - No se e
Whatever this is (and I don't have the slightest clue what that
might be), I noticed it on a 4.9 box the other day, upgraded to
-current, still see it there.
$ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 5.0-beta (GENERIC) #22: Tue Jul 26 06:24:05 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/ar
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:00 PM, R0me0 *** wrote:
> Hello misc.
>
> I would like to know if is possible do the following:
>
> clients--OpenBSD_FWExternal_mail_server
>
> when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and send a
> copy of this to anot
Hello misc.
I would like to know if is possible do the following:
clients--OpenBSD_FWExternal_mail_server
when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and send a
copy of this to another email account, it must be transparently to user.
Please, an
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > pppoe0 has 92.203.101.134.
> > this works fine:
> >
> > match out log on egress inet from 192.168.23.0/24 nat-to pppoe0
> >
> > tcpdump while p
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pppoe0 has 92.203.101.134.
> this works fine:
>
> match out log on egress inet from 192.168.23.0/24 nat-to pppoe0
>
> tcpdump while pinging:
> 92.203.101.134 > 74.125.39.147: icmp: echo request
> 74.125.39.147 > 92
Am 28.07.2011 08:01, schrieb Matthew Dempsky:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
Actually gotten fingers on a somewhat powerful machine and I thought why not
test a snapshot on it.
Leading is bsd with ps and trace, followed by bsd.sp which boots ok.
Hope this is not a malope
On 28 July 2011 07:50, Greg Jones wrote:
> On 07/27/11 16:42, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
>>
>> I found out the datasheet for 0x4383
>>
>> http://developer.amd.com/assets/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf
>>
>> I've no knowledge of PCI to debug it though.
>>
> Try something like this in rc.local and
Am 28.07.2011 um 16:06 schrieb Gregory Edigarov:
> let me guess
> I think you just need to allow traffic on enc0
>
> set skip on enc0
No, its not that easy. (-;
I block carp multicast messages on enc0 and just showed that.
A tcpdump on enc0 would have shown the same.
The problem is that those
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:23:02 +0200
Axel Rau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a routing firewall, which is also a ipsec client like this:
>
>ppp uplink (IPv4)
> |
>dc3|pppoe0
> +++
>
Well, it would be nice to have some more info like dmesg, hostname.? and
other info to help you solve the problem.
// rancor
Den 28 jul 2011 12:51 skrev "wp10596728-4" :
> Hi all,
> B
> I have a machine with 4.8 OpenBSD, which I want to use as a gateway.
> But I can not get any traffic on the 2nd
Hi all,
I have a routing firewall, which is also a ipsec client like this:
ppp uplink (IPv4)
|
dc3|pppoe0
+++
|+|dc1
| enc0
On 07/27/11 16:42, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
I found out the datasheet for 0x4383
http://developer.amd.com/assets/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf
I've no knowledge of PCI to debug it though.
Try something like this in rc.local and see if it works.
# Setting "Mother Board Audio Device" as D
Hi all,
B
I have a machine with 4.8 OpenBSD, which I want to use as a gateway.
But I can not get any traffic on the 2nd nic.
Forwarding for inet and inet6 is set =1
It is not a problem of the nics. If I install nic2 first then it works and
nic1
doesn't work.
It is also not a problem of PF, which d
Am 22.07.2011 um 00:13 schrieb Mikeal Clark:
> 163350.058716 Default ike_phase_1_recv_ID: received remote ID other than
> expected 1.2.3.4
I think, you need
srcid 1.2.3.4 dstid 5.6.7.8
on site A ike.
Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6 b +49 151 2300 9283 b computing @ chaos claudius
Web: http://www.smtgreen.com
Good morning! This is Ivan from China. Recently, we launched some new LED
bulbs, so I'm in a hurry to share with you.The lumen is up to 90lm/w,
CRI>80Ra. If any designs apeal to you, don't forget to give me a feed
back!Meanwhile, I also work in this field over years,
Good morning! This is Ivan from China. Recently, we launched some new LED
bulbs, so I'm in a hurry to share with you.The lumen is up to 90lm/w,
CRI>80Ra. If any designs apeal to you, don't forget to give me a feed
back!Meanwhile, I also work in this field over years, so I'm quite
familiar with the
On 2011-07-27, hvom .org wrote:
> Hi
>
> I very problem with packet-filter OpenBSD 4.9 !
>
> I read in /etc/pf.conf :
>
> scrub in all > syntax error
>
> scrub in > syntax error
>
> match in all scrub > syntax error
>
> scrub in all on $re0 > syntax error
>
>
> I become crazy, hel
On 2011-07-27, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> Ok, solved this one. bge0 was in group "local", which is matched by
>
> set skip on lo
>
> is this the desired behavior? It can catch you by surprise easily!
It's not desired behaviour, I think this should fix it but have
no time to test today
Index
24 matches
Mail list logo