Dear Hotel Owner,
Reviews about your hotel can make or break your hotel's success.
If you don't enough positive reviews on Expedia, Google, Tripadvisor,
Yahoo Travel and other such sites, you are losing the game.
If you have negative reviews about your hotel, you are at serious
disdvantage.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, dsp d...@2f30.org wrote:
Hi list :)
sorry for not be able to debug this problem a lot but
i haven't the slightest idea where to start!
after the Aug 11 snapshot i started to experience screen blackenings
How old was your previous snapshot?
--
Matthieu Herrb
Hi,
I'm trying to test softraid.
I use OpenBSD 4.8 Release, i have 2 disks :
wd0 250G Openbsd is installed ; wd0k slice is part of RAID (200G)
wd1 500G wd1k slice is part of RAID (200G)
I built my RAID using this : bioctl -c 1 -l wd0k,wd1k softraid0
All is ok, sd0c is mounted in /home (cf
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:32:47 +0200
Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, dsp d...@2f30.org wrote:
Hi list :)
sorry for not be able to debug this problem a lot but
i haven't the slightest idea where to start!
after the Aug 11 snapshot i started to
I built my RAID using this : bioctl -c 1 -l wd0k,wd1k softraid0
All is ok, sd0c is mounted in /home (cf /etc/fstab)
Now i disconnected wd1, restart computer. /home is available, but RAID1 is
degraded.
Add wd1, restart computer, try bioctl -R sd0 0:1.0 (give me an error like
not part
Hi,
I'm having a problem to shape download with PF. I have 2 HFSC queue
(main and second) created on my internal NIC. Main is my default
queue. If I try to match download traffic to the second queue, it still
go trought the main queue.
The IP I want to download trought the second queue for my
Hi all,
Using a snapshot from Aug 1st I can't get more than one of these relays to run
at the same time with the fallback forward to in there, but up to 3 at once
with that line removed from each relay, with 4 relays though it always fails.
Any idea if this is a bug or configuration issue?
What are the spaces in the IP addresses?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:46:26AM -0500, James Flom wrote:
:Hi all,
:
:Using a snapshot from Aug 1st I can't get more than one of these relays to run
:at the same time with the fallback forward to in there, but up to 3 at once
:with that line removed from
Hi misc'ers,
I have customised dhclient.conf so I can use nameservers other than my ISP's.
The first one on my list is unreliable, but instead of going to the next on the
list, ping, xxxterm and firefox are not finding the sites (ie DNS queries are
not being answered).
I am running Aug 14
Benvenuto nel piC9 completo Midi Professionale
e supporto mp3 del sito Internet.
Con migliaia di Midi top e canzoni mp3.
Siete nel posto giusto !!
WWW.GIGAMUSIC.EU
Midi canzoni Italiane e straniere
Musica nuova2011
Cucina italiana
Video diversi
tutto su www.gigamusic.eu
GRAZIE PER LA
Hello everyone,
I'm currently a master degree student, and I'd like to benchmark
packet filter over the number of tcp sessions per seconds it can handle.
So I've got a very basic setup working, consisting of one server
running OpenBSD 4.9 with PF (acting as firewall-router), and 2 PC's
Typos from me removing the real IP addresses, they were not in there when I
ran the actual test.
-James
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
David Hill
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:18 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: relayd
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Thomas Pfaff tpf...@tp76.info wrote:
dsp told me he had rebuilt devel/sdl with three patches removed and
this made the problem go away. I did what he did and it solved the
problem for me too (amd64 Aug 7 snapshot -- dmesg in previous post).
The patches
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com wrote:
I have customised dhclient.conf so I can use nameservers other than my
ISP's. The first one on my list is unreliable, but instead of going to the
next on the list, ping, xxxterm and firefox are not finding the sites (ie DNS
On 2011-08-16, Quentin Aebischer quentin.aebisc...@usherbrooke.ca wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm currently a master degree student, and I'd like to benchmark
packet filter over the number of tcp sessions per seconds it can handle.
So I've got a very basic setup working, consisting of one
There is not much to tweak, performance-wise. OpenBSD avoids such
buttons like the plague, and besides: benchmarks should be run with a
stock install, which is what 99% of users are going to be doing as well.
You can try looking at the output of 'pfctl -si' and see if any of those
is increasing a
It would be easier to look for what's wrong if you include the whole ruleset
On 2011-08-16, Michel Blais mic...@targointernet.com wrote:
I'm having a problem to shape download with PF. I have 2 HFSC queue
(main and second) created on my internal NIC. Main is my default
queue. If I try to
Hey everyone,
I have a question about the emu driver and a sound blaster live. I'm
trying to make my sound card work under OpenBSD 4.9, and have managed
only to get a bunch of white noise coming through the front speakers.
Does anyone have any experience with this card, and if so, would you
From: Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com
To: Daniel Melameth dan...@melameth.com
Subject: Re: Only the first nameserver entry in resolv.conf is being queried
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:46:15 -0700
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; x86_64-unknown-openbsd5.0)
nameserver 208.71.35.137
nameserver
Thx for the reply. Well I've already increased the state table size to
15 entries, 1 was not enough (there was up to 7
simultaneous state entries during the test). Hardware wise, I'm using
a xeon 2.4 GHz monocore with 1 GB of RAM. Since this server is used as
firewall only,
Hello list.
I have a question about the following observed behavior.
Let's assume that a user (user_a) belongs to two groups (group_a and
group_b.)
The user creates a directory called testdir and the ownership permissions
are
user_a:group_a after the directory is made. The user runs:
chown
Just to clarify a bit, I would not be surprised if IPTables performs
more quickly than PF in this particular test, for a couple of reasons:
- PF uses a red-black tree for the session tracking, while iptables uses
a hash table. The red-black tree means performance scales smoothly as
the number
Thx for the reply. Well I've already increased the state table size to
15 entries, 1 was not enough (there was up to 7
simultaneous state entries during the test). Hardware wise, I'm using
a xeon 2.4 GHz monocore with 1 GB of RAM. Since this server is used as
firewall
S_ISGID bits on a directory are meaningful in sysv, whereas on bsd
open(2) acts as if they were always on
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011, Stefan Johnson wrote:
On most of the unix / unix-like systems I support, this behavior would be
different. The file would be created with user_a:group_a (since group_a is
the primary group.) This is true on AIX, Solaris, Linux, and HP-UX per my
testing earlier today.
We've been using pf for a number of years with one pf firewall serving
multiple backend servers (i.e. Load-balanced web farm). Now we've added more
backend servers with their own external ip addresses. It seems a waste to
have one firewall for low volume, specialized sites, forwarding to only one
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011, Stefan Johnson wrote:
On most of the unix / unix-like systems I support, this behavior would be
different. The file would be created with user_a:group_a (since group_a
is
the primary group.)
27 matches
Mail list logo
