On Aug 24, 2012 8:48 PM, Erling Westenvik erling.westen...@gmail.com
wrote:
According to http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20110530221728
I've set up fully encrypted disk by using the bioctl(4) feature for
specifying a key disk
# bioctl -C force -c C -l /dev/wd0d -k /dev/sd0d
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
It is possible if you use different partitions on the same drive, however,
you would have to run -P twice ( once for each volume ).
Sorry for not mentioning that I'm aware about the possibility of having
several mini partitions on the
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
It is possible if you use different partitions on the same drive, however,
you would have to run -P twice ( once for each volume ).
Sorry for not mentioning that
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 09:54:25AM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
I never intended to imply that -P had anything to do with creation. I
simply meant that you would have to run bioctl with the -P option twice,
once for each partition when changing your passphrase.
Does that imply that one may
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 09:54:25AM -0600, Aaron Bieber wrote:
I never intended to imply that -P had anything to do with creation. I
simply meant that you would have to run bioctl with the -P option twice,
once for each
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
Thanks!
Mikkel
A year or so ago, as part of selecting a notebook to buy, I gathered
dmesg info from all of the notebooks I could find in local stores
(booting from and saving data to a USB stick) and sent it to
dm...@openbsd.org as well as using it myself. Since I expect that it
would be useful to the
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200
Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
Thanks!
Mikkel
pf doesn't have options for
Þðèäè÷åñêîå ïðîòèâîäåéñòâèå áàíêàì
Êàê çàùèòèòü ñåáÿ è ñâîé áèçíåñ îò ïðîòèâîïðàâíûõ äåéñòâèé áàíêà?
Êàê îñóùåñòâèòü ðàñòîðæåíèå êðåäèòà íà çàêîííûõ îñíîâàíèÿõ?
Êàê èçáåæàòü ñóäà ñ áàíêîì?
Êàê èçáåæàòü àðåñòà èìóùåñòâà?
Êàê ñîâåðøèòü âûâîä èç çàëîãà èìóùåñòâà?
 àäâîêàòñêîé êîìïàíèè Âàì ïîìîãóò
On 08/25/12 21:08, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 18:55:00 +0200
Mikkel Bang facebookman...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Is there a way to make my rc.conf.local more sensible and consistent, i.e. not
pf=YES
sshd=
named_flags=
but rather
pf=YES
sshd=YES
named=YES?
You may still want to be
3) Other than the dmesg/sensor info which will go to dm...@openbsd.org,
where should I send the additional info? If there's no suitable place,
I can just keep it around and let anyone who needs it ask me for it.
Dave
http://www.nycbug.org/?action=dmesgdadd=1
(For sake of the argument: pfctl has options, maybe they should be a
rc.conf option for it?)
pfctl is not a daemon per se, as opposed to e.g. smtpd or httpd.
As far as enabling pf and loading the ruleset, only a subset of the
pfctl flags are of interest.
Therefore, there is
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Brett wrote:
3) Other than the dmesg/sensor info which will go to dm...@openbsd.org,
where should I send the additional info? If there's no suitable place,
I can just keep it around and let anyone who needs it ask me for it.
http://www.nycbug.org/?action=dmesgdadd=1
13 matches
Mail list logo
