On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:15:13 +0100
Jan Lambertz jd.arb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
I try to run a qemu linux guest ontop of my openbsd 5.1 i386. I've tried
nearly any possible qemu command. I've tested archlinux,debian,sled and
ubuntu. In every case,qemu core dumps when loading the linux
Am 04.12.2012 00:57, schrieb Reyk Floeter:
Am Montag, 3. Dezember 2012 schrieb InterNetX - Carsten Schoene :
Hello,
i've setup a OpenBSD 5.2 (amd64) system using flashrd on a DELL R610
server,
with an Intel PRO/1000 PF (82571EB) dualport fibre optics adapter.
The system also have four
Hello again,
after several hours of testing i found a solution for my problem. Here the
command i run as root (so no ulimit problems):
qemu-system-i386 -smp 1 -drive
file=harddisk.qcow2,if=sd,media=disk,cache=writeback,aio=native -cdrom
/mnt/usb/debian-6.0.6-i386-CD-1.iso -m 512 -k de -localtime
Hi
working with OpenBSD running on VMware ESXi I would need to change
the SCSI block device timeout because our redundant-controller SAN
storage sometimes takes some time to respond when doing a failover. It
turns out that when this failover takes too long, some of our OpenBSD
VMs will crash.
Hi people
When upgrading I understand it's quite important to keep things in
sync. I wanna run -current with regular upgrades and at the same time
upgrade also packages/ports (and other things if needed).
Are there any kinds of standard scripts to automate the sync? If you
already use such scripts
On 2012 Dec 04 (Tue) at 18:06:56 + (+), Heptas Torres wrote:
:Hi people
:When upgrading I understand it's quite important to keep things in
:sync. I wanna run -current with regular upgrades and at the same time
:upgrade also packages/ports (and other things if needed).
:Are there any kinds
Kia ora/hello,
I am currently redesigning one of our border edge Firewalls and want
to split the existing SPARC64 v215 into several DL140's in an HA -
Active/Load-balanced configuration.
The Sparc64 hasn't been without issues - and is currently running 4.9
release + some patches and is due for a
On 12/4/12, Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org wrote:
On 2012 Dec 04 (Tue) at 18:06:56 + (+), Heptas Torres wrote:
:Hi people
:When upgrading I understand it's quite important to keep things in
:sync. I wanna run -current with regular upgrades and at the same time
:upgrade also
Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org writes:
sysmerge
pkg_add -u
That's it.
Like Peter says here, that's really all there is to it, once you know
how to run upgrades from source or via snapshot. My slightly chattier
take on doing snapshot to snapshot upgrades (yes, I'm that kind of lazy
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:44:59PM +, Heptas Torres wrote:
Thanks. What I meant was more things like the script
http://gouloum.fr/code/script/install_snapshot.sh - this seems a bit
outdated and was wondering whether people use something similar for
system upgrades plus some package
Hi Joel,
You can mix several architectures, that's not a problem for firewall and
routers, IP is OS arch independant.
The thing you must consider is packet processing. Some architectures are
fast to process for packets than other (with equivalent perfs on paper).
If you doesn't need low latency,
I recently upgraded to the 2 December 2012 amd64 snapshot, then at about
11am EST today (4 December) updated my source tree to -current. After
compiling and installing a new kernel and rebooting, my attempt to
rebuild userland aborted with a slew of errors in
Yes CARP/LACP layer2 load balancing was my first preference of design.
There is a very expensive Alcatel-Lucent 7750 on the upstream(red)
side that these machines are plugged into which does our BGP session
handling to our peer among other carrier things. These boxes whilst
very capable - are
rebuild userland aborted with a slew of errors in
/usr/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd/../dns.c. In case this was a short-term
glitch I re-updated my source tree at about 4pm EST and tried again,
with the same result.
Is this a known problem, or have I managed to screw something up?
I built
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
rebuild userland aborted with a slew of errors in
/usr/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/smtpd/../dns.c. In case this was a short-term
glitch I re-updated my source tree at about 4pm EST and tried again,
with the same result.
Is this a known problem, or have I
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Dave Anderson d...@daveanderson.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion; I'll give it a try -- and double-check that
the cvs update worked properly.
If it does fail again, please include the error messages and the run
up to them. Without that, there's nothing
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling j...@aenertia.net wrote:
Yes CARP/LACP layer2 load balancing was my first preference of design.
There is a very expensive Alcatel-Lucent 7750 on the upstream(red)
side that these machines are plugged into which does our BGP session
handling
17 matches
Mail list logo
