Re: A slight twist on the OpenBSD laptop question

2013-03-07 Thread Andres Perera
it's not relevant because these aren't stand alone gpus... here in venezuela they're still selling clarkdales... i know because i just bought two. can someone else in a developing country offer their observations? i don't see the need to upgrade to sandy bridge ++ because my system can handle

Re: altq: upsteam and downstream

2013-03-07 Thread lilit-aibolit
On 03/04/2013 10:17 PM, Martin Pelikan wrote: Hello. Thanks for your reply. I need to guaranty bandwidth for selected host (abu, ali) and pass all other traffic to bulk queue, but I have a lot of filter rules and don't know how to do it. I have applied queues to some pass rules and lost

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts on 5.0-release

2013-03-07 Thread lilit-aibolit
On 11/09/2011 10:27 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote: You can ignore the clueless parts in my previous message :) I can set up remote access to one of these machines if needed. This made the ems work again: --- if_em.c.origWed Nov 9 21:37:39 2011 +++ if_em.c Wed Nov 9 21:39:01 2011 @@

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts on 5.0-release

2013-03-07 Thread mxb
What about 5.2? Same issues? //mxb On 7 mar 2013, at 11:36, lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote: On 11/09/2011 10:27 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote: You can ignore the clueless parts in my previous message :) I can set up remote access to one of these machines if needed. This made the

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts on 5.0-release

2013-03-07 Thread lilit-aibolit
On 03/07/2013 01:10 PM, mxb wrote: What about 5.2? Same issues? //mxb I don't know. This is remote host1 and it holds IPSec with another host2. When issue come - network behind host2 can't reach resources behind host1.

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts on 5.0-release

2013-03-07 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:10:08PM +0100, mxb wrote: What about 5.2? Same issues? Even better, what about -current or 5.3 snaps? Ken

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts on 5.0-release

2013-03-07 Thread mxb
Yes, it's much better. I currently have several 5.2-current (post 5.2-rel ) machines with em(4) without any problems regarding em(4). 5.0 is EOL. On 7 mar 2013, at 13:09, Kenneth R Westerback kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:10:08PM +0100, mxb wrote: What about

Logitech Webcam Support

2013-03-07 Thread James Griffin
Hi My desktop is a Lenovo Think centre, and i' stuck a logitech hd 720p webcam in it. I wondered if anyone has had success with these - do they work on OpenBSD and what packages might I need/consider to use it. I ran sudo fw_update and it installed uvideo-firmware-1.2p0. The webcam has a

Re: Logitech Webcam Support

2013-03-07 Thread Erwin Geerdink
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:32:59 + James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.net wrote: Hi My desktop is a Lenovo Think centre, and i' stuck a logitech hd 720p webcam in it. I wondered if anyone has had success with these - do they work on OpenBSD and what packages might I need/consider to use it.

ospf and multiple areas

2013-03-07 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
Hi, I've having trouble configuring multiple areas in ospfd. System is current. If I put vlan12 interface in area 0.0.0.7, then vlan12:network is not announced at all. If I put it on area 0.0.0.0 then it is announced, but I don't see it as inter area in remote routers. How can I add it in

installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Jiri B
Hi, I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce some install.site alternative which could feed installer with configuration for setting disks etc... Or is there any (semi)official idea

Re: installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce some install.site alternative which could feed installer with configuration for setting disks etc... Or is there any (semi)official idea

Re: installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:19:22PM -0500, Jiri B wrote: Hi, I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce some install.site alternative which could feed installer with configuration

Re: snort inline

2013-03-07 Thread Justin Mayes
FYI This patch has corrected my issues with snort inline and NAT http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=136245826921904w=2 -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Justin Mayes Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:10 PM To:

Re: snort inline

2013-03-07 Thread Justin Mayes
This works. Thank you very much. I'll let you know if I run into any issues but I am able to run snort inline now along with NAT. Justin -Original Message- From: Lawrence Teo [mailto:l...@openbsd.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:55 AM To: Justin Mayes Cc: misc@openbsd.org

Re: installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Jiri B
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:23:41AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce some install.site alternative which could feed installer with

Re: installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Theo de Raadt
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:23:41AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce some install.site alternative which could feed installer with

Re: ZTE mf626 USB modem support

2013-03-07 Thread Maximo Pech
Here is my output of lsusb -v, hope it helps Bus 000 Device 001: ID 8086: Intel Corp. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass9 Hub bDeviceSubClass 0 Unused bDeviceProtocol 1 Single TT

Re: installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org writes: [...] The 5th word in your original email is we, and what you really mean to use there is the plural you. Is that a new theo.c entry? -- Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494

Intel hyperthreading w/ Atom E6xx OpenBSD 5.2?

2013-03-07 Thread David Ruggiero
I've been using OpenBsd for 8+ years on my main router/firewall (4 NICs). Time to upgrade (I'm back on v3.8, yikes). Past time, really. Solots to learn / re-learn here. Have patience. First question: I'll be loading 5.2 on a low-power, Atom E640-based box (the Soekris net6501). That chip

Re: Intel hyperthreading w/ Atom E6xx OpenBSD 5.2?

2013-03-07 Thread System Administrator
On 7 Mar 2013 at 20:24, David Ruggiero wrote: I've been using OpenBsd for 8+ years on my main router/firewall (4 NICs). Time to upgrade (I'm back on v3.8, yikes). Past time, really. Solots to learn / re-learn here. Have patience. First question: I'll be loading 5.2 on a low-power,

Re: Intel hyperthreading w/ Atom E6xx OpenBSD 5.2?

2013-03-07 Thread David Ruggiero
The OpenBSD kernel and network stack still do run only on CPU0, so if all you plan to do is use PF to filter traffic, then you are indeed better off disabling HTT. Thanks. That's the piece of info I needed, as (at least per current plans) 95% of the machine's time will be in PF-land, with

Re: Intel hyperthreading w/ Atom E6xx OpenBSD 5.2?

2013-03-07 Thread Andres Perera
wait wait ~ can someone comment on this http://www.daemonology.net/hyperthreading-considered-harmful/ ? is it still in vogue? On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:31 AM, David Ruggiero thatseattle...@gmail.com wrote: The OpenBSD kernel and network stack still do run only on CPU0, so if all you plan to

Re: installer - moving sets location right after network for automated installation

2013-03-07 Thread Todd Alan Smith
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas jca+o...@wxcvbn.org wrote: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org writes: [...] The 5th word in your original email is we, and what you really mean to use there is the plural you. Is that a new theo.c entry? +1