On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Stefan Olsson stefan.karl.ols...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order times out for me, is the order
site
down?
Kind Regards
I got 500 internal error too.
Thanks for all the prompt replies. The MUA is indeed the place to do the
modifications.
Just for the records, in SqurrelMail I had to modify the file
'class/deliver/Deliver.class.php'
Tony
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, James Griffin j...@kontrol.kode5.netwrote:
Fri
Hello misc,
I want to use iked but the manpage says it is not ready to use and some
important things are missing. What parts are missing and is it still not safe
at all or only under special circumstances?
Thanks
Matt
Going over the X FAQ, I see
11.1.1 - How much computer do I need to run X?
While How much computer is slightly amusing,
was it meant to be how much computer power
or something?
Jan
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:06:30PM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks,
i am running OBSD 5.2 and i would like to try to connect to a kerberos
server using php.
In the following link http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.kadm5.php in the
requirement section it is stated :
On 2013-04-12, Kostas Zorbadelos kzo...@otenet.gr wrote:
I think most probably the problem is in the network type (BROADCAST vs
P2P in Cisco). Is there some way to declare em3 as point-to-point in
ospfd or do I just need to remove
ip ospf network point-to-point
from the cisco interface
On 2013-04-12, Adam s...@my-balls.com wrote:
Trying to use userland pppoe for a DSL connection, I connect fine, and I
can pass small amounts of traffic through the link without issues. But as
soon as I send real traffic through it (a couple hundred Kb/sec of pretty
ordinary DNS and HTTP
On 2013-04-12, Rémi Bougard r...@unicsdev.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:06:30PM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote:
Hi folks,
i am running OBSD 5.2 and i would like to try to connect to a kerberos
server using php.
In the following link http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.kadm5.php
On 13.4.2013. 17:29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
ospfd doesn't support point-to-point on ethernet interfaces, you will
need to remove this from cisco config for now.
might not be too hard to add though.. (as in, I have a diff which builds,
but I have no idea if it works ;-)
could you post
On 04/13/13 07:52, Jan Stary wrote:
Going over the X FAQ, I see
11.1.1 - How much computer do I need to run X?
While How much computer is slightly amusing,
was it meant to be how much computer power
or something?
Jan
It was meant to be
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 02:31:03PM +0800, Alan Cheng wrote:
I got 500 internal error too.
Same here. The following page has a list of vendors which sell CD sets
and/or other OpenBSD stuff. The main site in Canada, which is having
issues, is only one of them.
On 2013-04-11, Joel Carnat j...@carnat.net wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to get rid of net-snmp and use the shipped snmpd(8).
I have OpenBSD boxes running various services (DNS, Web, Mail...) and have
scripts providing service stats using the extend/exec net-snmp feature. I
read about the oid
On 2013-04-13, Hrvoje Popovski hrv...@srce.hr wrote:
On 13.4.2013. 17:29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
ospfd doesn't support point-to-point on ethernet interfaces, you will
need to remove this from cisco config for now.
might not be too hard to add though.. (as in, I have a diff which builds,
Looking for a bit of clarification on match and nat-to. At one point
(and maybe still so?) nat rules were first matching as opposed to
the 'normal' case of last matching but match rules are sticky until
overridden.
With:
match out on $ext_if inet from !($ext_if) to any nat-to ($ext_if)
match out
Hello,
This is a question about OS behaviour which I can't find the answer for.
I am using the serial port as /dev/cua00 set up for non blocking and no
bytes count or timeout. Basicaly I send 5 bytes and after each one the
connected device sends one back, so there are 5 bytes as a response.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Mihai Popescu mih...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone give me some hints in this direction, please, what exactly
triggers usleep() internaly ?
usleep() doesn't trigger anything, but usleep(1) doesn't mean sleep
exactly 1us, it means sleep at least 1us. In practice,
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested whether a broad brush had been applied expecting
ufs and ffs to be the same or if clonezillas statement is correct but
thought it may be worth bringing up that clonezilla.org says
On 2013-04-13, Chris Smith obsd_m...@chrissmith.org wrote:
Looking for a bit of clarification on match and nat-to. At one point
(and maybe still so?) nat rules were first matching as opposed to
the 'normal' case of last matching but match rules are sticky until
overridden.
With:
match out
On 04/13/13 19:27, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested
...
Get back with me when you have.
I'll be happy to find out that statement is now wrong, but I've been
doing this about 20 years
I'm not sure how to look this up, and it doesn't seem to be in the FAQ.
I frequently add stuff that isn't in ports by building from sources.
Sometimes this real world stuff needs newer versions of other things
than what's in ports. But the port is already installed and has
things depending on
20 matches
Mail list logo
