I recently reworked my network and made my G4 Cube an IPSEC tunneling
host. Here is what I have done.
[jupiter] [uranus] --- wireless network starts here ---
[wireless router] [mars]
Jupiter is a core i7 computer running OpenBSD/amd64
Uranus is a Lanner atom based router running
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:03:08PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
I recently reworked my network and made my G4 Cube an IPSEC
tunneling host. Here is what I have done.
[jupiter] [uranus] --- wireless network starts here ---
[wireless router] [mars]
[snip]
Considering that
Hi,
I'm learning to use vi. I find that the buffer operation is different in
vi than vim. For example, in vim, it is ':bn', ':bp', and ':bd' to go
to next and previous buffer, and to close a buffer. Vi does not seem to
have them implemented.
Because of the popularity of vim, a lot of
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 15:48, Xianwen Chen wrote:
I'm learning to use vi. I find that the buffer operation is different in
vi than vim. For example, in vim, it is ':bn', ':bp', and ':bd' to go
to next and previous buffer, and to close a buffer. Vi does not seem to
have them implemented.
I
Ted Unangst wrote:
I think the easiest option is to install vim and use that.
I was going for that option. I asked the question on the list anyway. I
thought I might have missed something.
In general, our policy is to only document features that exist.
The list of features that don't exist
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Xianwen Chen xianwen.c...@gmail.com wrote:
In general, our policy is to only document features that exist.
The list of features that don't exist would be a neverending list. If
you are reading something other than official openbsd documentation,
it's your
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:48:15PM +0200, Xianwen Chen wrote:
Hi,
I'm learning to use vi. I find that the buffer operation is
different in vi than vim. For example, in vim, it is ':bn', ':bp',
and ':bd' to go to next and previous buffer, and to close a buffer.
Vi does not seem to have
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 04:38:45PM +0200, Xianwen Chen wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
I think the easiest option is to install vim and use that.
I was going for that option. I asked the question on the list
anyway. I thought I might have missed something.
In general, our policy is to only
I have a squid proxy listening in transparent mode on another faster
system, but I can't seem to get packets there with pf. I tried simply
modifying the other divert-to rule to use the IP address of that system. It
doesn't seem to work, packets don't reach that system.
#pass in quick on $int_if
On 05/03/13 14:03, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
I recently reworked my network and made my G4 Cube an IPSEC tunneling
host. Here is what I have done.
[jupiter] [uranus] --- wireless network starts here ---
[wireless router] [mars]
[snip]
Here is the CPU stats on mars:
CPU
...to everyone involved. Beautiful stuff that really tickles my
obsessions. Outstanding, people.
--
Monty Brandenberg, Software Engineer MCB, Inc.
mcb...@panix.com P.O. Box 425292
mcb...@pobox.com
John Tate j...@johntate.org wrote:
I have a squid proxy listening in transparent mode on another faster
system, but I can't seem to get packets there with pf. I tried simply
modifying the other divert-to rule to use the IP address of that
system. It
doesn't seem to work, packets don't reach that
Hello list,
Has anyone managed to set dual boot on an UEFI box with secure boot left
enabled? If the answer is yes, are there some instructions how to achieve
that?
I am trying to install -current on a Lenovo Y400 notebook, leaving
pre-installed windows 8 intact, as per the wishes of the
* John Tate j...@johntate.org [2013-05-03 17:23]:
I have a squid proxy listening in transparent mode on another faster
system, but I can't seem to get packets there with pf. I tried simply
modifying the other divert-to rule to use the IP address of that system. It
doesn't seem to work, packets
Hello list,
Has anyone managed to set dual boot on an UEFI box with secure boot
left
enabled? If the answer is yes, are there some instructions how to
achieve
that?
I am trying to install -current on a Lenovo Y400 notebook, leaving
pre-installed windows 8 intact, as per the wishes of the
To my astonishment: when printing a test page from cups, it outputs an
image of Tux!?!
Good day,
I can't get adsuck to start at boot on OpenBSD 5.3. I copied strings like a
monkey and thought them over (even testing them in shell), but no luck.
# grep adsuck /etc/rc.conf.local:
adsuck_flags=-c /var/adsuck -f /files/resolv.conf /files/hosts.small
# cat /etc/rc.local:
if [
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:41:32PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
To my astonishment: when printing a test page from cups, it outputs an
image of Tux!?!
Cups is Linux-ware, ported to OpenBSD.
The name claims to be common, but no, it's Linux-centric. As the
test logo shows.
==ml
--
Michael
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't CUPS originally UNIX-ware?
Quoting:
'UPS is the standards-based, open source printing system developed by
Apple Inc. for OS® X and other UNIX®-like operating systems.'
Best regards,
Nikola Gyurov
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Michael W. Lucas
Michael W. Lucas mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org wrote:
To my astonishment: when printing a test page from cups, it outputs an
image of Tux!?!
Cups is Linux-ware, ported to OpenBSD.
The name claims to be common, but no, it's Linux-centric.
Actually...
CUPS is the standards-based, open
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 02:52:06PM -0700, Scott wrote:
Good day,
I can't get adsuck to start at boot on OpenBSD 5.3. I copied strings like a
monkey and thought them over (even testing them in shell), but no luck.
# grep adsuck /etc/rc.conf.local:
adsuck_flags=-c /var/adsuck -f
I want to use fastcgi and suexec to run php programs as particular users
from Apache in a chroot. I've found documentation on running suexec, but I
can't find anything OpenBSD specific on getting fastcgi and php into the
chroot so I can use them. If you could at least please just point me in the
Ken,
Thanks for the tip! pkg_scripts did the trick (I'd never seen that
mechanism before). With regards to making adsuck play nice with dhcp (yes,
I tired the script line from the readme only to get errors), maybe the
dhclient-adsuck script was rewritten? I've done nothing special and yet it
all
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 06:08:15PM -0700, Scott wrote:
Ken,
Thanks for the tip! pkg_scripts did the trick (I'd never seen that
mechanism before). With regards to making adsuck play nice with dhcp (yes,
I tired the script line from the readme only to get errors), maybe the
dhclient-adsuck
24 matches
Mail list logo
