Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-15 Thread Łukasz Ratajski
On Saturday 15 March 2014 15:56:00 Michael Cornwell wrote: > I haven’t used this provider, but they use OpenBSD. > > http://www.neomailbox.net/ > > Mike You might as well check out BSWS. http://www.bsws.de/en Available in English and German, with a variety of services. Speaking from experience

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-15 Thread Michael Cornwell
I haven’t used this provider, but they use OpenBSD. http://www.neomailbox.net/ Mike On Mar 15, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Jean-Francois Simon wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm looking for a secure mail provider, i fpossible using OpenBSD, also > wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested peopl

Re: file system and memory limitation

2014-03-15 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 15:24, Friedrich Locke wrote: > Hi folks, > > i wonder what are the limitations on main memory and file system sizes ! They're big.

file system and memory limitation

2014-03-15 Thread Friedrich Locke
Hi folks, i wonder what are the limitations on main memory and file system sizes ! Thanks a lot. gustavo.

Re: OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-15 Thread Janne Johansson
2014-03-15 17:54 GMT+01:00 Jean-Francois Simon : > Hello all, > also wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested people. > No.

OpenBSD email provider

2014-03-15 Thread Jean-Francois Simon
Hello all, I'm looking for a secure mail provider, i fpossible using OpenBSD, also wondering if OpenBSD itself provides it for interested people. If anybody has informations thanks would be interesting to share. Regards Jeff

Re: Before sending to bug at openbsd....

2014-03-15 Thread sven falempin
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2014-03-15, sven falempin wrote: >> Ok what i get is the bridge itself who announce the working link ? >> But if the switch is sending LACP what is this outgoing LACP packet >> (the one not forwaded by tun nor by a bridge) ? > > I for

Re: current/macppc on a Powerbook6,1

2014-03-15 Thread Jan Stary
On Mar 15 14:42:28, s...@openbsd.org wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 02:07:16PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > This is an old 12" Powerbook G4 hw.model=7455 (Revision 0x303) > > with a freshly installed current/macppc. See full dmesg below. > > > > X doesn't work (NVIDIA GeForce4 440). > > I got the

Re: Before sending to bug at openbsd....

2014-03-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-03-15, sven falempin wrote: > Ok what i get is the bridge itself who announce the working link ? > But if the switch is sending LACP what is this outgoing LACP packet > (the one not forwaded by tun nor by a bridge) ? I forgot that the lacp needed to be sent by the switch/bridge. But if y

Re: Before sending to bug at openbsd....

2014-03-15 Thread sven falempin
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> > >Description: >> > Configuring trunk with LACP is broken. Cannot issue ICMP from >> > one trunk to another. This is done is a sandbox network. using to qemu >> > hosted openBSD. Strange FACT the id of the trunk stay Each >>

Re: current/macppc on a Powerbook6,1

2014-03-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 02:07:16PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > This is an old 12" Powerbook G4 hw.model=7455 (Revision 0x303) > with a freshly installed current/macppc. See full dmesg below. > > I can't switch consoles with ctrl+alt+Fx - is that expected? > Or is there another way to do that on a Po

current/macppc on a Powerbook6,1

2014-03-15 Thread Jan Stary
This is an old 12" Powerbook G4 hw.model=7455 (Revision 0x303) with a freshly installed current/macppc. See full dmesg below. I can't switch consoles with ctrl+alt+Fx - is that expected? Or is there another way to do that on a Powerbook? Ethernet works (gem). Sound works: I can record a file wit

Re: npppd ipcp pool address configuration

2014-03-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-03-02, Paul B. Henson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 12:56:16PM +0900, YASUOKA Masahiko wrote: > >> As the default, npppd doesn't use the local tunnel endpoint address >> and broadcast addresses in class network (10.0.0.0 and 10.255.255.255) >> for the clients. Do you worry about 10.128

Re: ROUNDROBIN TRUNK

2014-03-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2014-03-15, Max Power wrote: > Hi, > with Roundrobin Trunk, if a nic fails, > all traffic stop or the other nic continues to work > without problems...? > > Thank, Max Power. > > It depends on the failure mode. If the port loses link then it will stop being used, but it can't detect if the lin

Re: ROUNDROBIN TRUNK

2014-03-15 Thread Ville Valkonen
On 15 March 2014 10:03, Max Power wrote: > Hi, > with Roundrobin Trunk, if a nic fails, > all traffic stop or the other nic continues to work > without problems...? > > Thank, Max Power. Hello, other IF steps in and no problems should occur. -- Regards, Ville Valkonen

ROUNDROBIN TRUNK

2014-03-15 Thread Max Power
Hi, with Roundrobin Trunk, if a nic fails, all traffic stop or the other nic continues to work without problems...? Thank, Max Power.