Out of curiosity was anyone in any form of contact with
http://www.parallella.org/2014/04/10/parallella-pre-order-shipping-update/regarding
possible support in BSD?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014, at 02:02 AM, Tomáš Bodžár wrote:
Out of curiosity was anyone in any form of contact with
http://www.parallella.org/2014/04/10/parallella-pre-order-shipping-update/regarding
possible support in BSD?
Looks like their support is GNU/Linux-centric, but I know we have other
Looks like their support is GNU/Linux-centric, but I know we have other
ARM-based CPU ports already so we're at least halfway there. I wish I
was in a position to buy hardware for donation to the developers to
speed up the process, and if I was, I would.
If OBSD wants one, let me know where
On 2014-04-25, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I've now got to find a simple fibre bridge at an OK price. I asked the ISPs
about the ones they supply doing bridge mode and they suggested one if I
asked specifically for it but I found it was an ADSL one.
Since you're in the UK ..
On 2014-04-25, lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi misc, I know this is not truly OpenBSD related, but I'd like to know
if there is any possibility to collect such statistics.
I'm using NAT with PF for my LAN and I don't have any proxy applications
like squid.
I have already
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:53:42AM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
Some other debug here, and this time with (I hope) more useful info.
Thanks!
First of all, I confirm that the debug messages triggered by the added
printf instructions are *NOT* logged by dmesg (and /var/log/*), but are
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:20:34PM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
but:
# dmesg | egrep DEBUG
#
(no response)
# egrep DEBUG /var/log/*
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:21:33PM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
How can I check? For sure, there is no mention in the BIOS setup...
To find out if ASF is enabled, change this:
/* Allow WoL if ASF is unsupported or disabled. */
if (!(sc-bge_flags BGE_ASF_MODE)) {
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:31:47AM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
After further checks, I noticed that there still was a part of the patch
not correctly applied. I modified a bit the code and renamed the two
constants. Now there is no error after ifconfig bge0 wol.
Ok, so far so good.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:52:10PM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
In order to adapt your code to 5.4-Rel, I did the following
modification:
From:
+ /* Configure 10Mbps, the chip draws too much power in D3cold. */
+ if (!(sc-bge_flags BGE_FIBER_TBI)
+
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:16:52PM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
Your patch is still applicable to 5.4 stable (with only minor refinements),
but unfortunately it doesn't change anything for this BGE chip...
Thanks, this motivated me to poke a bit further at it.
Just to make sure: Did
Hi, I've never used mailing lists so please correct mistakes and forgive
me if this is not a bug, but as I understand it you should not be able
to crash the kernel as an unpriviledged user.
In brief, I was trying to format a usb stick as ext2, and was going back
and forth between linux and
I have a slapd running on my server, and ypldap and ypbind.
The problem is to start them in the correct order at boot.
For now, ypldap start first and block the whole boot process.
How can I make sure slapd start before yp-stuff ?
Thanks for advices.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 06:14:36PM +0200, Stéphane Guedon wrote:
I have a slapd running on my server, and ypldap and ypbind.
The problem is to start them in the correct order at boot.
For now, ypldap start first and block the whole boot process.
How can I make sure slapd start before
Hello list,
I worry about my 5.1 servers being at risk due to the heartbleed bug, as they
report openssl 1.0.1f which is known to be vulnerable:
mgate1:~ # uname -a
OpenBSD mgate1.itlabs.bg 5.1 GENERIC#2 amd64
mgate1:~ # openssl version -a
OpenSSL 1.0.0f 4 Jan 2012
built on: date not
Pardon me, just saw that it says 1.0.0f, not 1.0.1f.
Fear makes the wolf look bigger!
Y.
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:25 PM, Yassen Damyanov yassen_...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Hello list,
I worry about my 5.1 servers being at risk due to the heartbleed bug, as they
report openssl 1.0.1f
previously on this list Z contributed:
In brief, I was trying to format a usb stick as ext2, and was going back
and forth between linux and openbsd to get it working on both (I'm
fairly new to openbsd). The disklabel I ended up with is pasted below.
It seems misconfigured,
forgot to say make
Tried running OpenBSD on an ancient Nortel Contivity 100.
The issue is that the CPU claims to support RdRand despite being a 286MHz Cyrix
6x686MX.
So, as soon as OpenBSD tries to use that instruction for /dev/random, the
kernel jumps into debug land with the following:
kernel: privileged
I'm pretty sure that Linux does not manufacture disklabels that are
compatible with OpenBSD. And visa versa! And if you're
creating/mounting filesystems you are *not* an unprivileged user and
you *definitely* can crash systems if you're not careful. :-)
That said, if you can provide details on
previously on this list Z contributed:
In brief, I was trying to format a usb stick as ext2, and was going back
and forth between linux and openbsd to get it working on both (I'm
fairly new to openbsd). The disklabel I ended up with is pasted below.
It seems misconfigured,
You shouldn't need
The question I have is can I disable the random number generator?s use of
that instruction? I?d rather be on -current than years old.
Apart from the following hammer, I see no easy way to achieve this.
Index: i386/machdep.c
===
On 2014-04-26, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
The question I have is can I disable the random number generator?s use of
that instruction? I?d rather be on -current than years old.
Apart from the following hammer, I see no easy way to achieve this.
Index: i386/machdep.c
Hello all,
I'm creating a port for x2goclient (http://www.x2go.org/) but I don't
want to build the browser plugin and the documentation, only the heavy
client. So instead of the regular make, I have to launch make
build_client.
Here is my Makefile :
--8---
# AGPL-3+
COMMENT=X2GO is for
previously on this list Kevin Chadwick contributed:
/bin/dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd?c
Whoops, you should use the raw device on OpenBSD too. The following is
much faster at zeroing
/bin/dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd?c bs=32k
--
On 2014-04-26, Denis Fondras open...@ledeuns.net wrote:
Hello all,
I'm creating a port for x2goclient (http://www.x2go.org/) but I don't
want to build the browser plugin and the documentation, only the heavy
client. So instead of the regular make, I have to launch make
build_client.
Here
On 2014-04-26, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
The question I have is can I disable the random number generator?s use of
that instruction? I?d rather be on -current than years old.
Apart from the following hammer, I see no easy way to achieve this.
Index: i386/machdep.c
Hello,
I'm converting a .rc script made by someone a coupe of years ago for the
same product I'm currently working on. It's important for this tale as
this may mean that this actually worked for some previous versions.
I'm working on 5.2 version.
1. I have a custom rc_register() sub defined
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:47:00PM +0200, Michał Lesiak wrote:
Hello,
I'm converting a .rc script made by someone a coupe of years ago for the
same product I'm currently working on. It's important for this tale as this
may mean that this actually worked for some previous versions.
I'm
Hi Michal,
Michal Lesiak wrote on Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:47:00PM +0200:
I'm converting a .rc script made by someone a coupe of years ago for
the same product I'm currently working on. It's important for this
tale as this may mean that this actually worked for some previous
versions.
I'm
Good call. That would work around this current problem nicely. Though, I don’t
know if this problem is with this specific core, or Cyrix chips in general.
I won’t be too worried about the whole exercise. I was going to use it for a
project, but I realized how silly that would be given that you
30 matches
Mail list logo
