Hi,
let's say for example I have web server on internal network, and I have
redirected tcp port 80 from firewall to it:
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $pub_web port 80 \
rdr-to $priv_web
Assuming that $pub_web ip address is used exclusively for web server
access, and no other
* Paco Esteban p...@onna.be [2014-05-29 12:11]:
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marko Cupać wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 21:40:58 +0200
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
I'm pretty damn sure I added reset prio if queueing is on thing.
yes, in IF_ENQUEUE - hfsc_enqueue
Marko Cupa??(marko.cu...@mimar.rs) on 2014.05.30 11:32:14 +0200:
Hi,
let's say for example I have web server on internal network, and I have
redirected tcp port 80 from firewall to it:
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $pub_web port 80 \
rdr-to $priv_web
From the wording
If you are using encrypted vnd (vnconfig -k or -K) you will want to
begin planning your migration strategy.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ted Unangst t...@cvs.openbsd.org
Date: Fri 2014/05/30 10:14 -06:00
Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src
To: source-chan...@cvs.openbsd.org
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=139524543706370
kind regards,
Robert
Em 30-05-2014 08:43, Henning Brauer escreveu:
* Paco Esteban p...@onna.be [2014-05-29 12:11]:
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Marko Cupać wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 21:40:58 +0200
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
I'm pretty damn sure I added reset prio if queueing is on thing.
yes, in
On 30 May 2014 at 13:56, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Marko Cupa??(marko.cu...@mimar.rs) on 2014.05.30 11:32:14 +0200:
Hi,
let's say for example I have web server on internal network, and I
have redirected tcp port 80 from firewall to it:
pass in on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
On 2014-05-30 12:41, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
From my
experience, if you have an asymmetric link, where your download
rate is bigger than your upload rate, you can see benefits in putting
hfsc in front of it. And, the most benefit seems to be on the upload
side. There are some factors
My apologies, I have no idea why roundcube decided to format the
plain-text version of my last message that way.
-Adam
On 30 May 2014 19:13, System Administrator ad...@bitwise.net wrote:
On 30 May 2014 at 13:56, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Marko Cupa??(marko.cu...@mimar.rs) on 2014.05.30 11:32:14 +0200:
Assuming that $pub_web ip address is used exclusively for web server
access, and no other ports are
On Fri, 30 May 2014 11:14:40 -0700
Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6
Robert [info...@die-optimisten.net] wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 12:19:35 -0400
Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com wrote:
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Will 5.6 softraid support block sizes other than 512 byte?
This just in:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2347534/linux-foundation-thro\
ws-money-at-openssl-staffing-post-heartbleed
--
Ed Ahlsen-Girard, Contractor (Application Management Services) AFSOC/A6OK
email: edward.ahlsen-girard@hurlburt.af.mil
850-884-2414
DSN: 312-579-2414
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
On 2014-05-30 12:41, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
From my
experience, if you have an asymmetric link, where your download
rate is bigger than your upload rate, you can see benefits in putting
hfsc in front of it.
On 14-05-30 05:07 PM, sven falempin wrote:
Just curious. Because TCP got flow and congestion control it should be
possible to reduce the input bandwith of tcp connection even without
controlling the previous hop ???
Yes, but consider a router with 3 interfaces: WAN, LAN1 and LAN2. Let us
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:51:07PM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote:
I use ZZZ rarely, so I have no clue when the regression -- if it is a
regression -- began. Clue sticks welcome, as well a guidance for producing
more useful diagnostics.
Symptom: ZZZ apparently saves and shuts down. On reboot,
In message http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=140146687910205w=1,
Ted Unangst wrote:
If you are using encrypted vnd (vnconfig -k or -K) you will want to
begin planning your migration strategy.
[[...]]
WARNING: Encrypted vnd is insecure.
Migrate your data to softraid before 5.7.
Once this
18 matches
Mail list logo
