Re: hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 for openbsd 5.5 64 bit ?

2014-08-08 Thread Francois Pussault
Soft RAID is nearly transparent, low cpu or ram use, it uses some cpu but as you know 99% of time CPU just wait for bus... PF+VPN+SQUID+POSTFIX+SENDMAIL+APACHE+PHP classical webapp/mail server ? I guess ? you may have enough memory with 4Gohigher memory is always better of course...

Re: hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 for openbsd 5.5 64 bit ?

2014-08-08 Thread David Dahlberg
Am Donnerstag, den 07.08.2014, 18:51 +0530 schrieb Indunil Jayasooriya: Try to change the harddrive settings in BIOS. They are probably defaulting to raid-mode, which doesn't work under OpenBSD. i.e - does NOT this server's Hardware Raid (Mirror) work under OpenBSD? Will I have

Re: VPLS and PWE3 status in Openbsd

2014-08-08 Thread Alucard
Le jeudi 7 août 2014 23:28:37, Renato Westphal a écrit : 2014-08-05 9:17 GMT-03:00 Rafael Zalamena rzalam...@gmail.com: On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Alucard wrote: Hi, What is the status of VPLS/PWE3 support on Openbsd right now ? I have been researching a bit but cannot find a

Re: hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 for openbsd 5.5 64 bit ?

2014-08-08 Thread Nick Holland
On 08/07/14 22:56, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: If used soft-raid from BSD, does it consume more RAM or processing functions etc? Than a good RAID card? of course. significantly more? probably not. I will have to use this server for PF , OpenVPN , Squid, Postfix or Sendmail and

Re: hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 for openbsd 5.5 64 bit ?

2014-08-08 Thread Matthias Appel
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] Im Auftrag von Nick Holland Gesendet: Freitag, 8. August 2014 13:35 An: misc@openbsd.org Betreff: Re: hp proliant dl 320e gen 8 for openbsd 5.5 64 bit ? On 08/07/14 22:56, Indunil Jayasooriya

etcsum moved?

2014-08-08 Thread Stefan Olsson
Hi Misc, I've run into problems with recent snapshots and sysmerge. It complains about lack of ./var/db/sysmerge/etcsum - has etcsum been moved and sysmerge script not been updated, or what is wrong really? # uname -a OpenBSD HeadOfTheNetwork.xxx.local 5.6 GENERIC#273 i386 # sysmerge -s

APU.1C was MinnowBoard MAX

2014-08-08 Thread Stan Gammons
On 07/29/14 04:01, Stuart Henderson wrote: That's to do with the traffic that the system is handling, you wouldn't normally expect to see all that much fragmented traffic. If there are lots of fragments, are you using pppoe? If so then make sure you either use 'scrub max-mss' or set suitable

Re: etcsum moved?

2014-08-08 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 11:00:07AM -0400, Stefan Olsson wrote: Hi Misc, I've run into problems with recent snapshots and sysmerge. It complains about lack of ./var/db/sysmerge/etcsum - has etcsum been moved and sysmerge script not been updated, or what is wrong really? Did you run sysmerge

Re: VPLS and PWE3 status in Openbsd

2014-08-08 Thread noah pugsley
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Alucard aluc...@phangos.fr wrote: Le jeudi 7 août 2014 23:28:37, Renato Westphal a écrit : 2014-08-05 9:17 GMT-03:00 Rafael Zalamena rzalam...@gmail.com: On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:53:43PM +0200, Alucard wrote: Hi, What is the status of VPLS/PWE3 support on