I've found the following in the archives. Is the situation still the
same with
reassemble tcp?
My only scrub rule (in firewall/router) is
match in all scrub (no-df random-id reassemble tcp max-mss 1440)
Should I be worried?
Thanks
G
List: openbsd-misc
Subject:Re: pf: reassemble
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
1. Don't use different _in and _out names, use syntax like queue foo on em0
and queue foo on em1. That way you assign packets to the correct queues on
both interfaces in one step with something like match to port 53
Op Sat, 30 Aug 2014 14:20:43 +0200 schreef Erwin Geerdink
open...@erwingeerdink.com:
pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum
pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 10 11
pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing
vr0 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 VIA VT6105M RhineIII rev 0x96: irq 11,
auglx0 at
On 2014/09/05 03:49, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
1. Don't use different _in and _out names, use syntax like queue foo on
em0
and queue foo on em1. That way you assign packets to the correct queues on
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote:
yeah, don't use reassemble tcp. it's not perfect.
Isn't that default behavior?
Is it recommended to disable this feature?
BBC is propaganda, any way. Why should you watch this?!
On 4 sep 2014, at 13:49, Anthony Campbell a...@acampbell.org.uk wrote:
On 04 Sep 2014, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 03 Sep 2014, David Coppa wrote:
Thanks. I'm not using -current at the moment (I'm too new to OpenBSD) so
I'd better
On 05/09/14 18:10, Sonic wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote:
yeah, don't use reassemble tcp. it's not perfect.
Isn't that default behavior?
Is it recommended to disable this feature?
I'm not asking about set reassemble for fragmented
How can one know if a command appearing in the man pages is excluded from the
base install of an architecture without extracting base tarball to discover
this fact?
As an example, take pdisk in 5.5 RELEASE At
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi, a search for pdisk in All
Architectures,
I deleted the original thread on this subject, so sorry for another one.
I tried 5.6 current on the R900 and the ide controller is still hosed.
Not that it really matters, just wanted to report my findings. Here's
the dmesg
Stan
OpenBSD 5.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #353: Fri Aug 29
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 19:56, Justin Haynes wrote:
How can one know if a command appearing in the man pages is excluded from
the base install of an architecture without extracting base tarball to
discover this fact?
As an example, take pdisk in 5.5 RELEASE At
On Sep 5, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
The web interface has some peculiarities. It can be helpful, but it
doesn't quite reflect the man pages you will see on any actual OpenBSD
system.
If you look carefully at the path for man.cgi and pdisk, you'll see it
says macpcc, even when
Hi list.
Since I am happy with my Alix 2d13 running OenBSD, I ordered an APU board.
I read that there were/are issues regarding the BIOS for pre Apr 5 2014
releases. According to my board, the BIOS is the Apr 5 2014 release. So I
would assume it should boot fine but nope it does not.
Boot
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:47:18PM -0400, Mario St-Gelais wrote:
Hi list.
Since I am happy with my Alix 2d13 running OenBSD, I ordered an APU board.
I read that there were/are issues regarding the BIOS for pre Apr 5 2014
releases. According to my board, the BIOS is the Apr 5 2014 release.
13 matches
Mail list logo
