Hi all,
I appeal to you to see if you can give me some advice. I need to
secure communications between my front-end and back-end servers.
First, my infrastructure:
Internet ---> Public OpenBSD Carp'ed fws ---> FreeBSD front-end web
servers (https) ---> Internal OpenBSD Carp'ed fws ---> CentOS
So I am missing something, or being dumb.
sd0j is a 128g piece of disk. Doing
bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0j softraid0
Gives
softraid0: invalid metadata format
What am I missing? This is an amd64 snap of
Oct 4th. The vnconfig way of encryption has worked till I decided to do
things the new w
So The partition has to be raid, vs 4.2 BSD
Onward to my new disk...
--STeve Andre'
Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com
On October 6, 2014 12:22:25 AM "STeve Andre'" wrote:
So I am missing something, or being dumb.
sd0j is a 128g piece of disk. Doing
bioctl
People wrote:
> There are two things which irritates me in computing:
>
> 1. Need of security updates
> 2. Two pieces of technology which are not compatible with each other.
>
> I'm GLAD that finally we have Javascript. At last, we have language and
> platform that WORKS universally.
Except it
On 2014-10-03, Russell Sutherland wrote:
> I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
> institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
>
> At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
>
> There are a few issues for which I would
Hi,
Following http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=140508090726719&w=2,
I'm trying to implement a similar setup.
relayd(8) is listening on a public IP.
httpd(8) is listening on localhost:80 and apache-httpd-openbsd is
listening on localhost:81.
I would like to handle all traffic with httpd
Thanks for your guide.
But my truble is:
1. isp lan - i get IP by dhclient(ip + default route + dns)
2. I have global ip, but this is not working. In ifconfig i cant see my
global ip.(((
How setup /etc/ipsec.conf with dhclient with global IP???
04.10.2014 18:54, Zhi-Qiang Lei пишет:
On Oct 4,
On 03/10/14 19:07, Russell Sutherland wrote:
I am trying to determine whether using an OpenBSD system to perform
institutional NAT for our wireless users would be a viable option.
At the present time we are evaluating the A10 Thunder CGN appliance.
There are a few issues for which I would like
>1. OpenBSD is a great example of the difference that having security as
>a primary design and development objective makes, unlike most other
>OSes (including all flavors of linux) which do "added" security.
Yes, primary objective. Definitely.
It is also form of "added" security, because it is ba
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 11:36:33AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> talking about setting the record straight...
>
> System Administrator wrote on Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:57:56PM -0400:
>
> > 2. Open*BSD* as the name implies, had no "decades old" Unix code and
> > by now has had much of th
Hi,
talking about setting the record straight...
System Administrator wrote on Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 11:57:56PM -0400:
> 2. Open*BSD* as the name implies, had no "decades old" Unix code and
> by now has had much of the _original_ BSD code replaced as well.
The ancestors of OpenBSD are, in direct
11 matches
Mail list logo
