I'm sorry, but the question have sense.
Using HP 8510p for four years with OpenBSD, I have a great trouble with
reading SMBUS (data ready on it) for years.
Every release I need to apply a patch after upgrade for reading ACPII
data from 8510p in time, to prevent wrong data on SMBUS. Theo
Every release I need to apply a patch after upgrade for reading ACPII
data from 8510p in time, to prevent wrong data on SMBUS. Theo replied
that the patch will not be implemented in CVS because all ACPI must be
rewritten in new manner. But they will do nothing since my last report...
I doubt I
On 28 Mar 2015 at 8:00, Jeff wrote:
Hi,
We've been using pf.conf and tables for years but have
recently embarked on a project to optimize pf.conf.
In reading about tables it's not clear when tables are more
efficient than individual rules. Is there a definitive point? Is it
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Joel Rees wrote:
Is there any good reason for interleaving the return addresses with data
on the data/parameter stack in C? I know it's the tradition, from back
when it was all we could hope for to have one page per process, but that
has not been the case for many
On 28/03/15 16:22, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Should they be added?
Yes, they should, but we may have to wait until 5.7 is released for the
mirror maintainers to update their machines.
Ah, thanks for the clarification. Was not aware that they were that new.
Bernd
This is a question that has bothered me for more than twenty-five years.
Blame it on my being one of those forthies, I guess. Recent posts encourage
me to ask again.
Is there any good reason for interleaving the return addresses with data on
the data/parameter stack in C? I know it's the
Hi,
We've been using pf.conf and tables for years but have
recently embarked on a project to optimize pf.conf.
In reading about tables it's not clear when tables are more
efficient than individual rules. Is there a definitive point? Is it
three entries? six entries? ten
On 2015-03-28, Denis Lapshin den...@mindall.org wrote:
Hi,
Has OpenBSD implemented ACPI for Aspeed AST2050 in current or release?
The question doesn't really make sense, ACPI is a method where the
manufacturer can supply a set of BIOS tables with instructions about
how to route interrupts,
On 2015-03-28, Bernd Schoeller ber...@fams.de wrote:
The authenticity of host 'openbsd.cs.fau.de (131.188.40.91)' can't be
established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:gcWYMCjQHnmA97RT53MGCKp2kZ3pk5TZPFdYTJQl9/w.
Unfortunately, the SHA256 fingerprints are not published on
Hi -
I just tried to update my ports tree and got the following message,
using openbsd.cs.fau.de as AnonCVS host:
The authenticity of host 'openbsd.cs.fau.de (131.188.40.91)' can't be
established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:gcWYMCjQHnmA97RT53MGCKp2kZ3pk5TZPFdYTJQl9/w.
Unfortunately,
Hi,
continuing, time permitting, to build subversion on SPARC. Ruby and
Python build and installed!
I now have a problem with boost:
...
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: executing default commands
Adjustments to boost configuration have been written to
user.hpp. Copy this
On 2015-03-28, Geoff Steckel g...@oat.com wrote:
Is there a rule which will guarantee that a packet will be logged
no matter what happens to it later in pf processing?
match log(matches) might be useful here.
The IPv6 packets cross routing domains to get to/from gif0.
This may possibly be
Hi,
Has OpenBSD implemented ACPI for Aspeed AST2050 in current or release?
This IC is present in some Dell branded Tyan products like DCS6005 cloud
nodes and some other Tyan MBs. Seems Aspeed its their own product
because these ICs can be found on all Tyan server mainboards as I can see.
13 matches
Mail list logo
