Graham Stephens [gra...@thestephensdomain.com] wrote:
> Your code runs fine under the gcc version in OpenBSD 5.3.
>
So you get 1 and not 0 from the top two lines of ceill output?
Nothing has changed in /usr/src/lib/libm/src/ld80/s_ceill.c since
5.3 and the supporting headers have not changed in
> I run several standard services (Web, Mail, DNS, …) and have configured Munin
> to graph traffic and see what happened.
Good for you. I don't know if Munin is the go to tool for this in
OpenBSD, so seconding your query for comparative or "works-for-me" type
of (fresh) info, or search the mail a
Same with 5.7 under virtualbox.
On 8/6/15, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On OpenBSD-5.7/amd64 (under qemu/kvm), I'm getting incorrect results
> when using ceill(3). For values between 0 and 1, the returned value
> is 0, while I'd expected it to be 1. Using ceil(3) does return 1 as
> expected.
We have an older system running 4.9 that acts as a sort of
dev/test/scratch machine for messing around. When it was set up it we
threw a 10gb drive in there and did a generic install with all the
defaults. Over time, as we've used this for various stuff, we've
realized that that partitioning sc
On 2015-08-05, Dennis Kramer (DT) wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Does anyone know if there's a patch available for CVE-2015-5477
> (https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272) for OpenBSD 5.6 (BIND 9.4.2-P2) ?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Grt,
>
>
Besides CVE-2015-5477 there are a bunch of other DoS affecting th
Hello,
On OpenBSD-5.7/amd64 (under qemu/kvm), I'm getting incorrect results
when using ceill(3). For values between 0 and 1, the returned value
is 0, while I'd expected it to be 1. Using ceil(3) does return 1 as
expected. Is this my incorrect usage or a bug?
any advice/comment will be appreciated
> I've noticed this too for the last snapshots I've been trying, and was
> planning to check out the sources to see what changes has been commited
> causing what to me seems to be that the menu now gets alfabetically
> sorted.
While the mouse buttons bindings altogether are rarely used here except
> Is there a place to put them that is automatically read in addition to
> cert.pem?
There is also the question of removing some of them and keeping these
removed between updates, e.g. a domain plundering hosting company that
is not trust worthy. One thing that comes to mind is the recent sed -i
a
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:24:02AM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> We have to live with it for a while. I am not able to rewrite this.
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=141867225703413&w=2
Have faith and try this:
Index: conf.c
=
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 10:44:01AM +0200, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I run several standard services (Web, Mail, DNS, b
>
> I was wondering what was the usual OpenBSD way for proactive/real-time
> traffic monitoring and alerting.
> That is, which software to use that would, for example, read H
I used to use mediatomb but I no longer do so don't remember the details,
but I remember that that is an issue of the web management UI, it exposes
the whole file system so that you can decide what to share, theoretically
no limitations (although the mediatomb user may not have read access to
every
Hi,
I run several standard services (Web, Mail, DNS, …) and have configured Munin
to graph traffic and see what happened.
I was wondering what was the usual OpenBSD way for proactive/real-time traffic
monitoring and alerting.
That is, which software to use that would, for example, read HTTPD lo
Thanks, Jiri
I wasn't worried about the stability at this very moment. More about the
way to get me to from release to stable/current.
Regards,
Lysemose
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Jiri B wrote:
> > Ahh, I didn't see the snapshot before now.
> > I thought that I needed to re-compile the wh
> Ahh, I didn't see the snapshot before now.
> I thought that I needed to re-compile the whole thing to get me on -current.
>
> I will try the snapshot and report back!
Well, if you do not have your own testing and build process,
you do not need stable ABI/API for your production apps,
then just
We have to live with it for a while. I am not able to rewrite this.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=141867225703413&w=2
Ahh, I didn't see the snapshot before now.
I thought that I needed to re-compile the whole thing to get me on -current.
I will try the snapshot and report back!
Thanks,
Lysemose
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:40 AM, wrote:
> > Thanks, that's it!!
> > I'm not running current-release... I'll guess I h
16 matches
Mail list logo
