Re: requesting help working around boot failures with supermicro atom board

Mike Larkin azathoth.net> writes: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:16:40PM +, Dewey Hylton wrote: > > Dewey Hylton gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > > Mike Larkin azathoth.net> writes: > > > > > > acpidump please. > > > > > > my pleasure: > > > > > > [demime removed a uuencoded section

Re: Can't ping IPv6

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:01:03PM +0100, Mark Carroll wrote: > I have a fairly vanilla OpenBSD 5.7 installation on > a machine for which my provider told me, > > Net : 5.28.62.155, 2001:41c9:1:41c::155 > > My pf.conf is simple; it still has the, > block return# block stateless traffic >

Faulty memory - not the hardware

About 18 months I set up two i386 boxes running 5.5. One is called HOME and the other is AWAY and they were set up with SSH confugured to allow AWAY to call HOME to get some data by using the home data to be seen at AWAY and to use AWAY to remotely modify data at HOME. It worked

Re: Faulty memory - not the hardware

Whoops! Forgot to say both ends are running XFCE4. *** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I subscribed to the list. Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou. Rod/

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

Toby Slight [tobysli...@gmail.com] wrote: > On 15 September 2015 at 18:09, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > > > > > Sounds like a bug in the brand new EFI boot blocks which affects your uefi > > firmware and not some others. It seems all of your tests are pointing in > > the > > same

Sep 13 snapshot doesn't cleanly unmount / on reboot?

Hi all. I've got a pcengines APU running a recent snap (upgraded via bsd.rd), and it doesn't seem to cleanly unmount the root filesystem on reboot, always claiming "/mnt was not properly unmounted". Any ideas ideas why? boot> booting hd0a:/bsd: 6699132+2139392+259080+0+647168

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

On 15 September 2015 at 18:09, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > > Sounds like a bug in the brand new EFI boot blocks which affects your uefi > firmware and not some others. It seems all of your tests are pointing in > the > same direction, they are not a result of differences in the

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:35:16 +0100 Toby Slight wrote: > On 15 September 2015 at 18:09, Chris Cappuccio wrote: >> Sounds like a bug in the brand new EFI boot blocks which affects your uefi >> firmware and not some others. It seems all of your tests are

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

Am 15. September 2015 15:09:43 MESZ, schrieb Toby Slight : >The plot thickens... > >So I finally managed a successful UEFI install (I won't tell you how >many >chickens I had to sacrifice...) with the latest snapshots (15/09/2015), >and >following

Re: spamdb

just FYI. our spamd indeed had problems leading to corrupt db entries so some where never white listed. I changed it to use a simple in memory db and it now white lists as it should. the change is ok for us but not for openbsd, so I didn't submit any patch anywhere. the symptom of the

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

Toby Slight [tobysli...@gmail.com] wrote: > > Finally, is this kind of testing and information at all useful to the devs, > or am I just creating unnecessary noise on the list, and should I just wait > until it's a little further down the line? I've got a fair bit of free time > in the next week

Re: OpenSMTPD + mysql users (no baseuser system)

Hi, 3 sec on google : http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.opensmtpd.general/2310 Regards, Le 15/09/2015 14:37, Krzysztof Strzeszewski a écrit : Hi, How to configure smtpd.conf for users from mysql or other file .db? Regards, Krzysztof Strzeszewski

Re: OpenSMTPD + mysql users (no baseuser system)

OR https://www.mail-archive.com/misc@opensmtpd.org/msg01426.html Regards, Le 15/09/2015 16:45, ilyes aiouaz - google mail a écrit : Hi, 3 sec on google : http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.opensmtpd.general/2310 Regards, Le 15/09/2015 14:37, Krzysztof Strzeszewski a écrit : Hi, How to

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

On 15 September 2015 at 14:09, Toby Slight wrote: > The plot thickens... > > So I finally managed a successful UEFI install (I won't tell you how many > chickens I had to sacrifice...) with the latest snapshots (15/09/2015), and > following

Re: requesting help working around boot failures with supermicro atom board

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:16:40PM +, Dewey Hylton wrote: > Dewey Hylton gmail.com> writes: > > > > > Mike Larkin azathoth.net> writes: > > > > acpidump please. > > > > my pleasure: > > > > [demime removed a uuencoded section named > supermicro-X7SPE-HF-D525-acpidump.tgz which was 276

Re: requesting help working around boot failures with supermicro atom board

Dewey Hylton gmail.com> writes: > > Mark Kettenis xs4all.nl> writes: > > Oh that is interesting. Can you try disabling the lm(4) driver in > > your kernel? You can do: > > > > # config -ef /bsd > > ... > > ukc> disable lm > > 254 lm0 disabled > > 255 lm* disabled > > 256 lm* disabled > >

Re: requesting help working around boot failures with supermicro atom board

Dewey Hylton gmail.com> writes: > > Mike Larkin azathoth.net> writes: > > acpidump please. > > my pleasure: > > [demime removed a uuencoded section named supermicro-X7SPE-HF-D525-acpidump.tgz which was 276 lines] > > alright ... so this didn't work. i'll try to make the acpidump

Re: Can't ping IPv6

Ha, probably it would help if I added, ifconfig vio0 vio0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 lladdr fe:ff:00:00:4f:1a priority: 0 groups: egress media: Ethernet autoselect status: active inet 5.28.62.155 netmask 0xff00

Can't ping IPv6

I have a fairly vanilla OpenBSD 5.7 installation on a machine for which my provider told me, Net : 5.28.62.155, 2001:41c9:1:41c::155 My pf.conf is simple; it still has the, block return# block stateless traffic that I suppose I got from somewhere and generally seems to work fine. I can ping

OpenSMTPD + mysql users (no baseuser system)

Hi, How to configure smtpd.conf for users from mysql or other file .db? Regards, Krzysztof Strzeszewski

Re: Native EFI Bootloader Support

The plot thickens... So I finally managed a successful UEFI install (I won't tell you how many chickens I had to sacrifice...) with the latest snapshots (15/09/2015), and following http://blog.jasper.la/openbsd-uefi-bootloader-howto/. This time I opted to keep it simple and not attempt my usual