httpd on 5.8

Hi, is feasible make URL rewriting via new patterns feature in httpd daemon? I need rewrite to a PHP front controller. My nginx rule is: location / { try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php?$args; }

syslogd: Syscall 28 (SYS_sendmsg) in 18 October (i386) snapshot

Another pledge(2) related issue, this time in syslogd. Unfortunately, this occurs on an ancient Soekris box where rebuilding the syslogd executable will be a non-trivial task. Hopefully I am providing enough details to here to allow someone more knowledgeable with the information necessary to

Re: Install on compact flash

Am 18.10.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Josh Grosse: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:08:48PM +0200, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > >> ...Still cannot understand why some of you have adviced to put /dev on >> ramdisk: isn't MAKEDEV just run at install time and then only manually? >> From what emerged in the

Re: syslogd: Syscall 28 (SYS_sendmsg) in 18 October (i386) snapshot

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > Another pledge(2) related issue, this time in syslogd. No clue if my bug is related. Attempting to upgrade -current today and I get: Oct 18 14:29:39 stargate /bsd: ksh(4880): syscall 131 Oct 18 14:29:46 stargate

Re: syslogd: Syscall 28 (SYS_sendmsg) in 18 October (i386) snapshot

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 03:42:07PM -0400, Sonic wrote: > No clue if my bug is related. Attempting to upgrade -current today and I get: > Oct 18 14:29:39 stargate /bsd: ksh(4880): syscall 131 > Oct 18 14:29:46 stargate /bsd: ksh(30776): syscall 131 > etc. I don't think it's related since it's

Re: syslogd: Syscall 28 (SYS_sendmsg) in 18 October (i386) snapshot

> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 03:42:07PM -0400, Sonic wrote: > > No clue if my bug is related. Attempting to upgrade -current today and I > > get: > > Oct 18 14:29:39 stargate /bsd: ksh(4880): syscall 131 > > Oct 18 14:29:46 stargate /bsd: ksh(30776): syscall 131 > > etc. > > I don't think it's

Re: It was twenty years ago you see...

One happy user wishing everyone many more cycles! Heart warming stories of the 20 years of OpenBSD development. Theo de Raadt wrote: > The project is now at: > > ~322,000 commits > ~44 commits/day average > ~356 hackers through the years Thank you, Theo and friends for

Re: Install on compact flash

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 04:34:31AM +0200, Einfach Jemand wrote: > No. As far as I understand it: > The type (char or block), the major and minor number of the device > special file and its name are means to activate the corresponding device > handler ("driver") in the kernel and the bytes are

Re: CD's arrived

CD+Case && Coffee Mug arrived here in Saint Paul, MN > On Oct 7, 2015, at 9:51 AM, M Wheeler <6f84c...@refn.co.uk> wrote: > > CD's arrived today UK. Thanks again.

Re: It was twenty years ago you see...

On 10/18/15 07:36, Theo de Raadt wrote: OpenBSD's source tree just turned 20 years old. I recall the import taking about 3 hours on an EISA-bus 486 with two ESDI drives. There was an import attempt a few days earlier, but it failed due to insufficient space. It took some time to repartition

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

> I always find it amusing how OpenBSD is "audited", yet there's not one > audit > report on the OpenBSD website. The closest answer I've been able to find > on > the mailing list is to review all of the CVS commit logs. Yeah, that's not > opaque in the slightest... Yes, thats it. The audit of

It was twenty years ago you see...

OpenBSD's source tree just turned 20 years old. I recall the import taking about 3 hours on an EISA-bus 486 with two ESDI drives. There was an import attempt a few days earlier, but it failed due to insufficient space. It took some time to repartition the machine. It wasn't terribly long

Re: Diffie-Helman issue?

Also see: http://www.openbsd.org/58.html Search that page for 1024 (two occurrences). On 17 October 2015 at 14:03, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015-10-17, <22xtrv+f800c4addk...@guerrillamail.com> < > 22xtrv+f800c4addk...@guerrillamail.com> wrote: > > According to > > >

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

On 10/17/15 15:59, français wrote: I always find it amusing how OpenBSD is "audited", yet there's not one audit report on the OpenBSD website. The closest answer I've been able to find on the mailing list is to review all of the CVS commit logs. Yeah, that's not opaque in the slightest... I

Re: Install on compact flash

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 01:08:48PM +0200, Paolo Aglialoro wrote: > ...Still cannot understand why some of you have adviced to put /dev on > ramdisk: isn't MAKEDEV just run at install time and then only manually? > From what emerged in the discussion it looks that, besides /home, /var is > the

Re: Install on compact flash

Hi folks, first of all thanks for all your interesting answers! I didn't expect this topic to be so popular and I am quite satisfied to have received a broader perspective than I had in mind. My fault was not specifying exactly what jobs the machine would perform, that could have narrowed down

Re: It was twenty years ago you see...

Happy Birthday. And congratulations. :) On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > OpenBSD's source tree just turned 20 years old. > > I recall the import taking about 3 hours on an EISA-bus 486 with two > ESDI drives. There was an import attempt a few days

OpenBSD 5.8 released

OpenBSD 5.8 arrives on the 20th birthday of the OpenBSD project. October 18, 2015. We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.8. This is our 38th release on CD-ROM (and 39th via FTP/HTTP). We remain proud of OpenBSD's record of twenty years with only two remote holes in the

Re: It was twenty years ago you see...

It has been 15 years or so I had no degree, so no job One kind soul called me to be An apprentice without salary Windows 2000 & Zonealarm Was the firewall where I was Once in 3 months required a reinstall Because it became the cracker's ball An apprentice not knowing too much About networking

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

> Im going to chime in here a second, even though it probably is not my > place. > > I am not a network guru, or computer wizard. I have made a living for > the last 5 years by networking. We use nothing but OpenBSD routers for this. > With the help of the community I have been able to learn and

Re: It was twenty years ago you see...

Happy Birthday. And thanks to Theo and all the deveopers for OpenBSD ! A great OS. Congratulations. Le 10/18/15 07:36, Theo de Raadt a écrit : OpenBSD's source tree just turned 20 years old. I recall the import taking about 3 hours on an EISA-bus 486 with two ESDI drives. There was an import

Re: It was twenty years ago you see...

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > OpenBSD's source tree just turned 20 years old. > I discovered OpenBSD a couple of years later, and have been a fan since then. Thank you and the other developers very very much for the quality of work, and the

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

> Both, however, ended up shutting down after Theo and various users told them > that their projects were worthless and that they weren't contributing to > OpenBSD. > I guess they didn't strongly believe in their added value if they cancelled the project after someone told them it was not worth.

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Kevin Gerrard wrote: > > Im going to chime in here a second, even though it probably is not my > > place. > > > > I am not a network guru, or computer wizard. I have made a living for > > the last 5 years by networking. We use nothing but

Re: Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

You only need a great deal of memory if you wish to use deduplication, which is an optional ZFS feature that some people consider worth the cost. While the complexity and licensing of ZFS make it inappropriate for inclusion in OpenBSD, at least in the near future, let's not throw around insults as