Re: passive mode ftp pf.conf OpenBSD 5.6 i386

Em 23-10-2015 12:58, Motty escreveu: > ### RULES FOR FTP > anchor "ftp-proxy/*" > pass in quick proto tcp to port ftp rdr-to 127.0.0.1 port 8021 > pass in quick on $ext proto tcp from any to 10.1.10.8 port ftp rdr-to > $web_server port ftp I believe you need a nat instead of rdr. From

Re: correct way to clear sensitive data from env?

Em 23-10-2015 12:14, Tamas TEVESZ escreveu: > case in point: openvpn passing username/password in the environment to > openvpn_bsdauth. > > so there's actually a bit of a sensitive data in env that current > wisdom rightly tends to want to junk as soon as possible. I wrote many years ago an

[mot] serious about clang/llvm?

i have been reading up online news about the core team considering a move from 'gcc' to "clang/llvm". is it really true? wouldn't that add a whole lot of complexity to the base system? isn't clang/llvm written in c++11? wouldn't 'pcc' be a better alternative? especially because (i think) openbsd

correct way to clear sensitive data from env?

hi, case in point: openvpn passing username/password in the environment to openvpn_bsdauth. so there's actually a bit of a sensitive data in env that current wisdom rightly tends to want to junk as soon as possible. getenv(3) states, "If getenv() is successful, the string returned should be

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

> > Subject: Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm? > > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Bolgheroni > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:43:50AM -0400, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > > >> i had heard rumours about the openbsd core team having a part of > >

Re: correct way to clear sensitive data from env?

> case in point: openvpn passing username/password in the environment to > openvpn_bsdauth. > > so there's actually a bit of a sensitive data in env that current > wisdom rightly tends to want to junk as soon as possible. > > getenv(3) states, "If getenv() is successful, the string returned >

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > There are more things to LLVM/clang than its complexity and the fact > that it's written in C++. GCC is also pretty complex. For a better > clarification, check this: > >

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

Raul Miller wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Bolgheroni > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:43:50AM -0400, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > >> i had heard rumours about the openbsd core team having a part of openbsd > >> built using 'pcc', is it true? if yes, did

Re: passive mode ftp pf.conf OpenBSD 5.6 i386

Em 22-10-2015 19:49, Motty escreveu: > I am trying to configure pf.conf (OpenBSD 5.6) I know it is a beaten and old argument, but please upgrade your OpenBSD. 5.6 isn't supported anymore. That being said, I don't think your problem has anything to do with your OpenBSD version. > when I use

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:43:50AM -0400, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: >> i had heard rumours about the openbsd core team having a part of openbsd >> built using 'pcc', is it true? if yes, did that effort not produce

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Bolgheroni > wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:43:50AM -0400, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > >> i had heard rumours about the openbsd core team having a part of openbsd > >> built using 'pcc', is it true? if yes, did that effort not

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:43:50AM -0400, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > i have been reading up online news about the core team considering a move > from 'gcc' to "clang/llvm". > is it really true? wouldn't that add a whole lot of complexity to the base > system? isn't clang/llvm written in c++11?

Re: pledge(2) problems on 18/x/ octeon snapshot

Miod Vallat wrote: > > > Might be a stupid question, but I haven't found an answer to it yet > > > - how does one update to a new snapshot/kernel on an octeon system? > > > > boot bsd.rd and select upgrade in the installer. (i hope.) > > > I'm afraid this is not as simple as this, yet. You will

does src include sys ?

today i first time follow current . # cd /usr # export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs.jp.openbsd.org:/cvs # cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P src cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P sys<--- 1)quetion is [cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P sys] needless ? and Faq write about

Re: does src include sys ?

Tuyosi Takesima wrote: > today i first time follow current . > > # cd /usr > # export CVSROOT=anon...@anoncvs.jp.openbsd.org:/cvs > # cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P src > cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P sys<--- > 1)quetion > is [cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -P

Re: passive mode ftp pf.conf OpenBSD 5.6 i386

Thank you very much! ### RULES FOR FTP anchor "ftp-proxy/*" pass in quick inet proto tcp to port ftp divert-to 127.0.0.1 port 8021 pass out inet proto tcp from $ext to any port ftp worked for me! On 10/23/2015 11:09 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em 23-10-2015 12:58, Motty escreveu: >> ###

Re: CD's arrived

I got my 5.8 pre-order today. Compared to 5.7, which I waited 1/2 a year for, this was "fast" :-/. Hey, I just wanted to support the good cause, anyway ... Thanks for all the good work and the release for download! Cheers Eike -- Eike Lantzsch ZP6CGE Agencia Shopping del Sol Casilla de Correo

Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm?

> From dera...@openbsd.org Fri Oct 23 09:23:36 2015 > From: Theo de Raadt > To: Raul Miller > cc: Mayuresh Kathe , > OpenBSD general usage list > Subject: Re: [mot] serious about clang/llvm? > > > On Fri,

Re: passive mode ftp pf.conf OpenBSD 5.6 i386

Thank you very much for your reply! I did configured ftp proxy as reverse: /usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -p 8021 -R 192.168.8.17 -P 21 -D7 -v Pf.conf ext="bnx0" int="bnx1" ext_net="10.1.10.0/24" web_server="192.168.8.17" sap_server="192.168.8.10" mail_server="192.168.8.22" # Default block all block in

apu1d as an NTP server

Howdy, Has anyone here used the PC Engines apu1d system board as an NTP server? I'm looking at setting up some in house stratum-2 servers so I can be a better neighbor. Wondering what kind of performance/capacity others have seen with this board. Thanks for your time. -Gene

Re: apu1d as an NTP server

How large is your network? Brian Conway On Oct 23, 2015 5:42 PM, "Gene" wrote: > Howdy, > > Has anyone here used the PC Engines apu1d system board as an NTP server? > > I'm looking at setting up some in house stratum-2 servers so I can be a > better neighbor. Wondering what

Re: apache 2.4 - Missing mod_cgid.so?

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:20:43PM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote: > Dear misc@ reader, > > I've just upgraded my home server to 5.8, so I switched to apache 2.4 > (from 2.2); the problem is that my git server no longer works and the > root cause seems to be that httpd2 with my current