Hey,
Welcome to the OpenBSD community mailing list. I'm also using CARP for
lots of HA-setups and yes, I will be gentle. I have never had issues
like yours but my setup seems very different. The virtual host id (vhid)
and its ip adress becomes a carp-group, so changing the vhid back and
forth
2016-01-21 11:16 GMT+01:00 Stuart Henderson :
> On 2016-01-20, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> > network inet connected is broken in 5.6, 5.8 and -current.
> > Restarting bgpd is required when making interface changes.
>
> Ah, so it was fixed in 5.7 and broken again? Now the previous mail
> (http://permal
On 1/21/2016 5:53 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Removing timestamps will kill performance unless it's on a slow line.
It gives a good clue though - try this (on the centos box) instead:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8893888/dropping-of-connections-with-tcp-tw-recycle
Better reference.
http:
On 2016-01-21 12:28, Raf Czlonka wrote:
I didn't add a prefix, it's been added in the log by the program
itself. My
config file looked like below:
option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.71, 192.168.0.149;
option classless-static-routes 192.168.32/24 192.168.0.1;
On 2016-01-21 12:28, Raf Czlonka wrote:
I didn't add a prefix, it's been added in the log by the
program itself. My
config file looked like below:
option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.71, 192.168.0.149;
option classless-static-routes 192.168.32/24
1
I hadn't seen anything posted to misc@ or tech@ about this yet, but
wanted to thank the person responsible for the relatively recent
addition (looks like late Oct or early Nov 2015) of the BUILDINFO
file included with the kernel/base snapshots. I only noticed it last
week and it was a rather nice s
Hello,
This is my first time posting here so be gentle.
It seems that random CARP interfaces on our systems will just die, stop
replying to any requests OR only 1 request out of ~50 will make it through,
slowly.
tcpdump also shows no traffic reach the interface. Only when that 1 request
makes i
The man page on boot(8) for amd64 says we should be able to print the
contents of the processor registers if compiled with DEBUG.
If we can do so on amd64, it seems we are missing a few debug.* files
in the amd64 source tree to do so.
% find /usr/src/sys/ -type f | xargs grep -l "DUMP_REGS"
/usr/
Folks,
I also see this, on an i386 system. It's been happening since 2015-12-19,
but I hadn't used snapshots since 2015-09-25, where it did not occur. I
download snapshots from mirror.ox.ac.uk.
Installing base59.tgz stalls at 98%, 48128KB.
Dmesg can be found at http://www.hydrus.org.uk/ref/chr
Hi misc@,
I'm using iked to establish ipsec tunnels on a multi-homed OpenBSD
system (classical failover setup). iked is used to initialize key
exchanges between various servers (which run strongswan/charon for IKE
via ikev2).
The iked.conf basically consists of entries like
ikev2 active esp from
On 21/01/16 13:15, Stuart Henderson wrote:
See pf.conf(5) "allow-opts".
thanx Stuart :)
that did the trick
G
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:15:42AM GMT, Etienne wrote:
> On 2016-01-21 00:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> >>man dhcp-options(5) shows the option classless-static-routes, however,
> >>when I use it, dhcpd fails to start and returns:
> >>
> >>dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 49: unknown option
> >>dhcp.c
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 07:41:59PM -0700, Chris Wojo wrote:
> Here is a one liner from the beacons at home:
It seems this AP does not support 802.11n and is using WEP.
Is this correct?
> Here are a few beacons from work:
There's nothing unusual in these beacons as far as I can tell.
> This wo
On 2016-01-21, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm constantly seeing this on my pf router.
> rule 61/(ip-option) pass in on $ext_if: $ext_gw > 224.0.0.1: igmp query
> [tos 0xc0] [ttl 1]
>
> Rule 61 is:
> @61 pass quick inet proto igmp from $ext_if:network to 224.0.0.1 keep
> state (no-sync)
On 2016-01-21 00:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
man dhcp-options(5) shows the option classless-static-routes, however,
when I use it, dhcpd fails to start and returns:
dhcpd: /etc/dhcpd.conf line 49: unknown option
dhcp.classless-static-routes
It looks like it should just be "classless-static-ro
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:40:41AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:27:06PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm constantly seeing this on my pf router.
> > rule 61/(ip-option) pass in on $ext_if: $ext_gw > 224.0.0.1: igmp query [tos
> > 0xc0] [ttl 1]
> >
On 21/01/16 12:40, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:27:06PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I'm constantly seeing this on my pf router.
rule 61/(ip-option) pass in on $ext_if: $ext_gw > 224.0.0.1: igmp query [tos
0xc0] [ttl 1]
Rule 61 is:
@61 pass quick inet proto igmp f
On 2016-01-21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-01-21, Steve Shockley wrote:
>> A while back [1], I posted a question asking about timeout issues using
>> Openup (or any transfers really) to work through a Websense proxy.
>> Later, I had problems with Smokeping on OpenBSD showing ~50% packet l
On 2016-01-21, Steve Shockley wrote:
> A while back [1], I posted a question asking about timeout issues using
> Openup (or any transfers really) to work through a Websense proxy.
> Later, I had problems with Smokeping on OpenBSD showing ~50% packet loss
> going through the proxy. After far to
Hi,
I'm constantly seeing this on my pf router.
rule 61/(ip-option) pass in on $ext_if: $ext_gw > 224.0.0.1: igmp query
[tos 0xc0] [ttl 1]
Rule 61 is:
@61 pass quick inet proto igmp from $ext_if:network to 224.0.0.1 keep
state (no-sync)
tcpdump on $ext_if shows:
$ext_gw > 224.0.0.1: igmp qu
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:27:06PM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm constantly seeing this on my pf router.
> rule 61/(ip-option) pass in on $ext_if: $ext_gw > 224.0.0.1: igmp query [tos
> 0xc0] [ttl 1]
>
> Rule 61 is:
> @61 pass quick inet proto igmp from $ext_if:network to 224.0.
On 2016-01-20, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> network inet connected is broken in 5.6, 5.8 and -current.
> Restarting bgpd is required when making interface changes.
Ah, so it was fixed in 5.7 and broken again? Now the previous mail
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/227597) makes more
sen
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Marko Cupa?? wrote:
> Or even better, start with 'block log', and inspect blocked traffic in
> real time with:
> # tcpdump -n -e -q -ttt -i pflog0
Very true. Or even add log (all) to all rule if you want all packets. The main
point remains,
logging is ess
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:19:32 +0100
"Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote:
> I've already told you the basic steps, but as to the PF part, I'd
> start with a block, then open the stuff I need, as in
Or even better, start with 'block log', and inspect blocked traffic in
real time with:
# tcpdump -n -e -q
> network inet connected is broken in 5.6, 5.8 and -current.
> Restarting bgpd is required when making interface changes.
>
Thank you very much Tony.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:25:16AM +0800, zje.net.cn wrote:
> sorry, i had tried many times with inspecting all settings, but can't make
> the NAT well done yet.In this environment, my haproxy is working well, so i
> think the base network settings are good
As long as you're not providing any f
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 09:30:57AM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:56:25PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:51:21PM -0800, Simon McFarlane wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Now that the Xen guest stuff is getting some love, I think it would be fun
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 07:36:01AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > There are a couple public AMIs available, but I'm curious as to how they are
> > built. It'd be pretty cool to be able to build a given snapshot into an AMI,
> > rather than be dependent on whomever is creating the public ones.
>
2016-01-18 18:39 GMT+01:00 Peter N. M. Hansteen :
> For about the last week, I've been seeing this oddity with the amd64
> installer when doing snap to snap upgrades on my laptop.
>
> My routine for quite a while has been to fetch snapshots off the local
> mirror whenever I notice there's a new on
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:56:25PM -0800, Jonathon Sisson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:51:21PM -0800, Simon McFarlane wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now that the Xen guest stuff is getting some love, I think it would be fun
> > to toy around with OpenBSD on EC2 (particularly because of EBS -- o
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 06:20:48PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> It is not enabled in GENERIC, so obviously not ready yet :)
>
> The CPU usage, time and networking issues are know and should go away
> after mlarkin@ finished implementing proper interrupt handling.
>
> On the userland side, the
31 matches
Mail list logo
