Re: asking for help compiling dns stats collector (dsc)

Hi! On 2016-02-22 20:08, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2016-02-21, Imre Oolberg wrote: Hi! I am in the middle of implementing https://www.dns-oarc.net/tools/dsc/ while on OpenBSD is running nameserver process i.e. there needs to be also collector part of DSC and I am not

Re: no bandwidthd src pkd in /usr/ports

> > I want to install bandwidthd. But I can't find a src pkg in /usr/ports > > > > is there a Binary pkg? > > There's neither a package nor a port. Thanks for this. > > > what about this ? > > > > >

Re: no bandwidthd src pkd in /usr/ports

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:26:10AM GMT, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > Hi Misc, Hi Indunil, > I have OpenBSD 5.5 64 bit gateway. It is in need of an update, then ;^) > I want to install bandwidthd. But I can't find a src pkg in /usr/ports > > is there a Binary pkg? There's neither a package

Re: Alternative route table issue on 5.8

On 25/02/16(Thu) 00:05, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 24/02/16(Wed) 21:57, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > > Le 24 févr. 2016 à 19:58, Martin Pieuchot a écrit : > > > > > > On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using

no bandwidthd src pkd in /usr/ports

Hi Misc, I have OpenBSD 5.5 64 bit gateway. I want to install bandwidthd. But I can't find a src pkg in /usr/ports is there a Binary pkg? what about this ? https://sourceforge.net/projects/bandwidthd/files/bandwidthd/bandwidthd%202.0.1/bandwidthd-2.0.1.tgz/download Any comment? -- cat

Re: IPv6

Paul Ammann [p...@fastmail.us] wrote: > Hi > > I've been reading about IPv6 and the KAME project. > > I read that OpenBSD integrated just IPv6 code rather than both (having > developed their own IPSec stack). > > The information that I'm reading is from 2004. Does anyone who if this > is still

Re: Alternative route table issue on 5.8

On 24/02/16(Wed) 21:57, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 24 févr. 2016 à 19:58, Martin Pieuchot a écrit : > > > > On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using alternative route table to send ping a on > specific > >> route. > >>

Re: Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2 years? (net/file IO) How much is it a relevant prio?

Tinker [ti...@openmailbox.org] wrote: > First, Thank you for this fantastically awesome OS. > > > Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2 > years? (Network IO, file/disk IO) > Network SMP (and other subsystems required to support it) is the heaviest area right

Re: e-commerce framework suggestion? medoc?

So, I'll probably use Ubercart. Thanks everyone. The "Django" software seems good too 'Mariano', I'll read more on that. About the laws and regulations 'Dave', I will need to see that. Here in my country we have all these regulations too. Thanks for the advice.

Re: Alternative route table issue on 5.8

> Le 24 févr. 2016 à 19:58, Martin Pieuchot a écrit : > > On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using alternative route table to send ping a on specific >> route. >> >> On a fresh install, I simply do >> >>> route -T 1 add default

Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2 years? (net/file IO) How much is it a relevant prio?

First, Thank you for this fantastically awesome OS. Just curious, what are approx plans for kernel-multicore-ness next 1-2 years? (Network IO, file/disk IO) Are there any relevant cases today where the singlecore architecture actually is limiting? Say on a 20-core machine doing random file

Re: Alternative route table issue on 5.8

On 24/02/16(Wed) 18:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > Hello, > > On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using alternative route table to send ping a on specific > route. > > On a fresh install, I simply do > > > route -T 1 add default 192.168.1.1 > > ping -V 1 8.8.8.8 > > It works well on 5.7, but I can't managed

Alternative route table issue on 5.8

Hello, On OpenBSD 5.7, I'm using alternative route table to send ping a on specific route. On a fresh install, I simply do > route -T 1 add default 192.168.1.1 > ping -V 1 8.8.8.8 It works well on 5.7, but I can't managed to get it working on 5.8. On a fresh install of 5.8, doing the same

Re: IPv6

Thank you, Theo, for the history and clarification. It's always good to hear stories like this. I'm building a IPv6 lab and I was trying to figure out fact from fiction. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016, at 11:58 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I've been reading about IPv6 and the KAME project. > > > > I

Re: APC UPS & sensorsd - how?

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:38 AM, lilit-aibolit wrote: > On 03/22/2015 05:44 PM, T. Ribbrock wrote: >> >> Then, I re-applied power, but that, too, was never flagged by sensorsd. >> For some reason, it looks like sensorsd only ever detects a status change >> (for these rules)

Re: IPv6

> I've been reading about IPv6 and the KAME project. > > I read that OpenBSD integrated just IPv6 code rather than both (having > developed their own IPSec stack). > > The information that I'm reading is from 2004. Does anyone who if this > is still true? KAME had a v6 stack that included

Re: e-commerce framework suggestion? medoc?

For the eshop part, you can use ubercart (drupal module). It should be reasonably sound and maintained.

Re: e-commerce framework suggestion? medoc?

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote: I'm currently deciding to do a "e-commerce" website. I noticed that OpenBSD Store use a software from medoc.com. If not medoc, do you guys have any other suggestion for e-commerce framework? It have to be open source, because I can't pay a

Genere ganancias a través del Marketing digital y Redes sociales

Incremente sus VENTAS y aumente el POSICIONAMIENTO de su negocio a través del Marketing Digital Marketing digital MARKETING DIGITAL Y REDES SOCIALES PARA EMPRESAS DE ALIMENTOS Y BEBIDAS. ¡Obtenga la información completa! Sólo presione sobre la fecha ó la imagen. 16 Marzo Monterrey.

Re: change partition size impossible?

On 2016-02-24 07:55, dmitry.sensei wrote: Like this: http://daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=5332 As the author of the guidance in that ancient forum thread, please note that the recommendation in my first response to use one large filesystem should be disregarded. The prevalent use of

Re: change partition size impossible?

Problem solved. I did a re install and edit the filesystem first delete all partitions from d and above than add all partitions and give the size I want. and add mounted parts. thanks again On 24-02-16 wk8 08.20, Jaap Bosman wrote: Hello Is it possible to change partition size in OpenBSD 5.9?

Re: Upgrade to 5.8 broke equal-cost multipath configuration

> Le 24 févr. 2016 à 12:56, Jean-Daniel Dupas a écrit : > >> Le 24 févr. 2016 à 10:57, Stuart Henderson a écrit > : >> >> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> After more test, it looks like a change in the mpath behavior. >>> >>> Is looks

Re: sshfs man page, -o idmap=user

> After putting > kern.usermount=1 > into /etc/sysctl.conf and changing the rights > chmod 660 /dev/fuse0 > I was then able to mount a remote filesystem, but > I ran into permission problems. Thus I tried > to add -o idmap=user into the command, which > results in immediate diconnecting: > > $

simple dhclient question

Hello Misc, is it possible to change the defaul right access of leases info $ cat /var/db/dhclient.leases.em0 cat: /var/db/dhclient.leases.em0: Permission denied I have no secret in this file, but a user might want to check the routers list, or if the lease is still valid. Is there a reason

Re: How full can a ffs filesystem be?

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:50:41AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:43:06AM +, John Long wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > > > On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote: > > > > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs

Re: hostname | /etc/hosts

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:59:04PM +, Craig Skinner wrote: > Do not use .local - it buggers up Apple toys. I would also recommend not using any valid top-level domain that you do not control for this purpose. A certain (microsoft-heavy) organization's choice of $companyname.int as the

Re: hostname | /etc/hosts

On Wed, 24 Feb 2016, Peter Hessler wrote: > On 2016 Feb 24 (Wed) at 12:59:04 + (+), Craig Skinner wrote: > :Hi Rodrigo, > : > :On 2016-02-24 Wed 10:48 AM |, Roderick wrote: > :> > :> Should the name in /etc/myname include a domain name? Even when I > :> do not have a

Re: hostname | /etc/hosts

On 2016 Feb 24 (Wed) at 12:59:04 + (+), Craig Skinner wrote: :Hi Rodrigo, : :On 2016-02-24 Wed 10:48 AM |, Roderick wrote: :> :> Should the name in /etc/myname include a domain name? Even when I :> do not have a static IP registered in a public DNS? :> : :Yes, these non-public "domains"

Re: change partition size impossible?

Like this: http://daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=5332 On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Jaap Bosman wrote: > Hello > > Is it possible to change partition size in OpenBSD 5.9? > > Try to change partition size on install: error message: "partition f is > currently 4194304

Re: hostname | /etc/hosts

Hi Rodrigo, On 2016-02-24 Wed 10:48 AM |, Roderick wrote: > > Should the name in /etc/myname include a domain name? Even when I > do not have a static IP registered in a public DNS? > Yes, these non-public "domains" are suitable: .localdomain .internal .private .priv You can serve them on

Re: hostname | /etc/hosts

2016-02-24 11:48 GMT+01:00 Roderick : > Dear Sirs! > > Should the name in /etc/myname include a domain name? Even when I > do not have a static IP registered in a public DNS? > > In "man 5 myname" I read: > > "The file should contain a single line specifying the fully >

change partition size impossible?

Hello Is it possible to change partition size in OpenBSD 5.9? Try to change partition size on install: error message: "partition f is currently 4194304 sectors in size and can have a maximum size of 4194304 sectors." Tried to use disklabel. delete partition and make new one with preferred

Re: e-commerce framework suggestion? medoc?

Django[0] is a popular choice nowadays. There's also DjangoCMS[1] which is "easier" to use for less technical people. And don't forget to examine as many as ecommerce[2] modules as you want. [0] http://www.djangoproject.com/ [1] http://www.django-cms.org/ [2]

Re: Upgrade to 5.8 broke equal-cost multipath configuration

> Le 24 févr. 2016 à 10:57, Stuart Henderson a écrit : > > In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After more test, it looks like a change in the mpath behavior. >> >> Is looks like the route is based on the source IP and not the dest IP as it >> should. >> >> Is

hostname | /etc/hosts

Dear Sirs! Should the name in /etc/myname include a domain name? Even when I do not have a static IP registered in a public DNS? In "man 5 myname" I read: "The file should contain a single line specifying the fully qualified domain name (FQDN) of the system" Does FQDN mean, that anyone in the

Re: How full can a ffs filesystem be?

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 05:43:06AM +, John Long wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:48:44PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote: > > On 02/23/16 14:42, John Long wrote: > > > Is there any rule of thumb as to how full an ffs filesystem can be without > > > impacting performance or integrity issues? > >

Re: relayd: high CPU usage by one or two proc. of many

On 2016-02-24, mxb wrote: > Hey, > I have a strange behavior of relayd running on 5.8. > This machine almost exclusively terminates TLS traffic. > Exceptions are forwards which are in backup state (listen on CARP). > > Some times one or two relayd processes out of many

IPv6

Hi I've been reading about IPv6 and the KAME project. I read that OpenBSD integrated just IPv6 code rather than both (having developed their own IPSec stack). The information that I'm reading is from 2004. Does anyone who if this is still true? Regards, Paul

Re: APC UPS & sensorsd - how?

On 03/22/2015 05:44 PM, T. Ribbrock wrote: Then, I re-applied power, but that, too, was never flagged by sensorsd. For some reason, it looks like sensorsd only ever detects a status change (for these rules) when it gets started - but not afterwards. Regards, Thomas Have you succeed with

bug in pair ?

hi i play around with pair with current 5.9 . what i dit # cat /etc/hostname.pair* inet 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.248 NONE rdomain 3 inet 172.16.0.2 255.255.255.248 NONE so i can ping now between rdoamin 0 and rdomain 3 because i dont patch the interface like the man page describe. bug ?

relayd: high CPU usage by one or two proc. of many

Hey, I have a strange behavior of relayd running on 5.8. This machine almost exclusively terminates TLS traffic. Exceptions are forwards which are in backup state (listen on CARP). Some times one or two relayd processes out of many consumes a lot of CPU and stays like this until I restart relayd.

Re: e-commerce framework suggestion? medoc?

arrowscr...@mail.com (arrowscr...@mail.com), 2016.02.24 (Wed) 07:15 (CET): > I'm currently deciding to do a "e-commerce" website. I noticed that > OpenBSD Store use a software from medoc.com. > If not medoc, do you guys have any other suggestion for e-commerce > framework? It have to be open