Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Marko Cupać
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 21:28:10 +0200 Mihai Popescu wrote: > > - > > queue download on $if_int bandwidth 10M max 10M > > queue ssh parent download bandwidth 1M > > queue web parent download bandwidth 8M > > queue bulk parent download bandwidth 1M default > > > > match to

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Marko Cupać
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:28:11 +1100 Darren Tucker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Marko Cupać > wrote: [...] > > queue download on $if_int bandwidth 10M max 10M > > What's $if_int set to? > > I played with queueing recently and initially used

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Darren Tucker
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Marko Cupać wrote: [...] > queue download on $if_int bandwidth 10M max 10M What's $if_int set to? I played with queueing recently and initially used interface group names instead of interface names ("queue foo on egress ...") since that's

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:45:36PM -0700, Daniel Melameth wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton > wrote: > > I'm using queuing to alleviate bufferbloat and make my son's gaming > > performance better. I'm on an asymetric cablemodem connection here

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Mihai Popescu
> - > queue download on $if_int bandwidth 10M max 10M > queue ssh parent download bandwidth 1M > queue web parent download bandwidth 8M > queue bulk parent download bandwidth 1M default > > match to port sshset queue ssh > match from port sshset queue ssh > match to port

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 03:38:30PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > [... snip ...] I've also been trying to get help with queuing. Perhaps we can help each other out. I'm using queuing to alleviate bufferbloat and make my son's gaming performance better. I'm on an asymetric cablemodem

Re: how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 03:38:30PM +0100, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > [ ...snip... ] > So, what exactly do I need to do to submit bug report? Any outputs of > any commands? Logs? I understand developers won't take my word for it, > but I simply don't know how to prove it, except watching output

how to submit bug report regarding pf queueing?

2016-03-09 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, Over last few months, in a few separate threads here on misc@, I have been trying to call attention to the fact that pf queueing mechanism does not shape traffic as it should, at least on my APU box. It took me some time to test hundreds of possible configurations on 5.8, both amd64 and

Re: bgpd network connected

2016-03-09 Thread Matt Schwartz
It looks like I spoke too soon because routes are not being added at all when using rdomains. It doesn't matter if I use network inet connected or specify network x.x.x.x/x, the rib comes up empty for the rdomain. Bgpctl won't let you inject routes into a different routing table other than the

Re: Upgrade to 5.8 broke equal-cost multipath configuration

2016-03-09 Thread Kevin Chadwick
> I did fill a bug report, but just in case someone is interrested, I think the > issue is > in rtable_match() (rtable.c) > > Instead of using the dest address to compute the hash that is used to choose > the route, that function uses the radix node dest address (which is always 0 > in > my case

Re: unbound eats up buffer space

2016-03-09 Thread Marko Cupać
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 12:24:59 +0100 Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Give unbound more file descriptors; put in login.conf: It's already there, by default on 5.8. > And do not forget to set the class of the user _unbound to unbound: It's already set by default on 5.8. On Tue, 8 Mar 2016

Re: bgpd network connected

2016-03-09 Thread Tony Sarendal
2016-03-08 15:38 GMT+01:00 Matt Schwartz : > I did not even know it was broken? > > On Mar 8, 2016 1:26 AM, "Tony Sarendal" wrote: > > > > Is there any chance of getting "network inet connected" fixed to 5.9 ? > > > > Regards Tony > > Adding a new vlan interface: