Re: Swift?

On 2016-05-12 08:37, nacredata wrote: I was thinking of the Apple sponsored projects which is now supposedly open source & usable server side. I've done Objective-C in the past but have not played with Swift yet myself; if it were available I might play with that amongst all the other languages

Re: TLS now supported on openbsd.org?

>So >is their an agenda or just many idiots who see TLS=security and don't >see lack of secure cookie usage and XSS vulnerabilities (now protected >by SSL everywhere) meaning a site is likely exploitable in other ways!! You guys should seriously check "Nirvana fallacy".

Re: light browsers

> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff > wrote: > > You must face the reality: all web browsers are broken. Modern web > > rendering engines are too complex and too fast-moving to be securable at > > all. Mozilla and Google made every effort to ensure that

Re: light browsers

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > You must face the reality: all web browsers are broken. Modern web > rendering engines are too complex and too fast-moving to be securable at > all. Mozilla and Google made every effort to ensure that nobody can

pf queue bandwidth estimation

using broadbandspeedchecker.co.uk i measured the bandwidth on my virgin media line, the download speed varied form as low as 20Mb/sec up to 50Mb/sec depending on the time of day the test was run, what will be the result if i put a value for the queue bandwidth which is greater or lesser the the

Re: light browsers

sogal said: >> Basically anything that is using webkit is going to have issues: >> https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/02/01/on-webkit-security-updates/ >> >> This means, xombrero, luakit, probably all the others that aren't >> firefox and chromium. > > Thanks for the interesting link. > The

Re: httpd - Multiple index files?

Thank you very much! I will look into that. On Thu, 12 May 2016 12:54:02 +0200 Erling Westenvik wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:18:09AM +, Romain wrote: > Allright. > Thanks for your answer. Have a look at this thread:

Re: light browsers

> Firefox used to be nice, but I don't like the way it goes with > embedded crap such as Hello or even worse, the Pocket thing. > Indeed, but it's maybe the last web browser caring about its users, without selling them or asking them to pay. w3m already has been mentionned on the list. With some

Re: TLS now supported on openbsd.org?

> > It's main unrealised potential benefit is; add *some* security by > > default to all those insecure wordpress logins. > > That's a terrible reason. And actually it's "make those insecure > CMS sites look more like they might be secure" when they're no > such thing. Because people have been

Re: TLS now supported on openbsd.org?

> On 2016-05-10, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > >> > Also, after you generate and sign the certificate, you don't have > >> > to keep the script. > >> > >> Validity on the letsencrypt CA is 90 days max. (Partly to restrict > >> usefulness of a bad cert because they don't do

Re: PF and interface changing IP

Am 12.05.2016 11:52 schrieb Gabriele Tozzi: I did not know about the "new" parentheses feature. It was brand-new with the 3.2 release :-) -- pb

Balanced and failover IPSEC

Hello, this is my first post on OpenBSD, so do not riddle me, please... I have one infrastructure with one tunnel IPSEC. This works ok, but I think I can duplicate the transfers. My topology is like this: * One ADSL 20Mb on Site A * Two ADSL 10Mb on Site B * Consists on one OpenBSD by

Re: light browsers

Le Thursday 12 May 2016 à 09:52:56AM, Aaron Bieber a écrit : > > sogal writes: > > > Le Wednesday 11 May 2016 à 10:26:03PM, > > 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com a écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ? > > > > You might want to give a

Re: httpd - Multiple index files?

On 2016-05-12, Erling Westenvik wrote: > Not that I'm aware of. Anyway: Such logic should be part of your > application, not the web server since it would just add unnecessary and > ambiguos complexity to the latter. > >> Or should I do it in another way? > > You

Re: light browsers

sogal writes: > Le Wednesday 11 May 2016 à 10:26:03PM, 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com > a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ? > > You might want to give a try to xombrero. > It's webkit based and was "Built with security in mind" [0]

Re: light browsers

Le Wednesday 11 May 2016 à 10:26:03PM, 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com a écrit : > Hi, > > did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ? You might want to give a try to xombrero. It's webkit based and was "Built with security in mind" [0] When in "whitelist" mode, it

Re: Swift?

I was thinking of the Apple sponsored projects which is now supposedly open source & usable server side. I've done Objective-C in the past but have not played with Swift yet myself; if it were available I might play with that amongst all the other languages and frameworks that I am using on

Re: light browsers

Hi, On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:26 PM, <3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ? I've been using www/luakit for a long time on a thinkpad x40/i386. It is running fast and works just fine. html5 support was fixed in

Re: light browsers

> dillo is in ports www/dillo - a fast and light graphical web browser (no JS) [http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/ports/www/dillo/pkg/DESCR] "Dillo is a multi-platform graphical web browser known for its speed and small size. It is written in C and C++ and based on FLTK."

Re: Swift?

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:30:42PM -0400, Devin Ceartas wrote: > Can you run Swift on OpenBSD? > > > devin Which one? This:https://swift.org Or that: http://swift-lang.org/main/ rru

Re: light browsers

On 12.05.2016 00:26, 3sad68+aivzh013i5...@guerrillamail.com wrote: Hi, did anyone try Midori or other light browsers with good results ? Sent using GuerrillaMail.com Block or report abuse: https://www.guerrillamail.com/abuse/?a=TEhnBi0PU7Ebih2wvnENdQ%3D%3D Midori works fine. But if your

Re: httpd - Multiple index files?

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:18:09AM +, Romain wrote: > Allright. > Thanks for your answer. Have a look at this thread: https://github.com/reyk/httpd/issues/27 And my example would probably be better this way: > On Thu, 12 May 2016 11:40:10 +0200 > Erling Westenvik

Re: httpd - Multiple index files?

Allright. Thanks for your answer. On Thu, 12 May 2016 11:40:10 +0200 Erling Westenvik wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:04:50AM +, Romain wrote: > Is it possible to supply multiple index files to the directory index > directive? I mean, I would like to

Re: PF and interface changing IP

Thank you for all your answers. I did not know about the "new" parentheses feature. Solved :) Gabriele Tozzi -- GPG Key Fingerprint: DAD1 E3E3 C3E9 36FB C570 F405 9B5F 7108 A1D0 2FFF

Re: httpd - Multiple index files?

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:04:50AM +, Romain wrote: > Is it possible to supply multiple index files to the directory index > directive? I mean, I would like to write something like that in > httpd.conf: > >directory index "index.html" "index.php" > > which would mean that, if

Re: light browsers

dillo

Re: malloc.conf on BeagleBone Black

On May 10 18:45:49, h...@stare.cz wrote: > > > > > malloc() warning: unknown char in MALLOC_OPTIONS > > > > if it's only some programs, then it's because those are older programs. > > Yes they are. I will get back after they recompile. Thanks. Indeed, after recompiling the ports (it was

Re: PF and interface changing IP

On 12 May 2016, Gabriele Tozzi wrote: (snip) > Then I have setup PF to allow incoming ssh traffic. Here is my rule: > > pass in on pppoe0 inet proto tcp to pppoe0 port ssh keep state > > > The interface has a dynamic IP. I was relying on the "!/sbin/pfctl -f > /etc/pf.conf" rule to reload my PF

Re: PF and interface changing IP

pass in on pppoe0 inet proto tcp to (pppoe0) port ssh keep state Von meinem Samsung Gerät gesendet. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Gabriele Tozzi Datum: 12.05.2016 09:45 (GMT+01:00) An: misc@openbsd.org Betreff: PF and interface changing IP

Re: PF and interface changing IP

>From the pf.conf man page: "Surrounding the interface name (and optional modifiers) in parentheses changes this behaviour. When the interface name is surrounded by parentheses, the rule is automatically updated whenever the interface changes its address. The ruleset does not need to be reloaded.

Re: PF and interface changing IP

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:35AM +0200, Gabriele Tozzi wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a pppoe0 interface setup like this (hostname.pppoe0): > > inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \ > pppoedev re0 \ > authproto pap \ > authname 'myuser' \ > authkey 'mypass' up >

PF and interface changing IP

Hi there, I have a pppoe0 interface setup like this (hostname.pppoe0): inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 NONE \ pppoedev re0 \ authproto pap \ authname 'myuser' \ authkey 'mypass' up dest 0.0.0.1 !/sbin/route add default 0.0.0.1 !/sbin/pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf

Re: Interface between block/char device and driver handler functions

> So my question is, how do I get a block device in /dev to connect to > my driver open/close/ioctl/etc functions? And secondly, if I want this > to happen automatically a la MAKEDEV, am I supposed to edit the m4 macro > in etc/etc.armv7/MAKEDEV.md or is there a more proper way? I figured out the