Holy frijole, just reading some of the responses from the some people
in GNU - I'm at the point where I'm not entirely convinced that GNU
isn't a cult, with Stallman as the high almighty leader.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Leah Rowe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
I'm forwarding this to a few other lists just to see if i can get some
more input on it. I would like to think this is an arch specific bug as
i imagine there are people using raid 5 with more than 8 disks on amd64
/ i386. However i haven't tried this on amd64, so i am not certain.
1. Steps to
I'm unable to see USB devices connected to the internal USB headers on
a PC Engines APU2c2 board. The same devices work as expected when
connected to the external USB ports.
I have a TinyCore Linux USB stick handy that I used to update the
board's firmware. If I boot it and run `lsusb` then I ca
Somehow sent the inverse of the intended diff, all apologies.
Please find the proper diff attached.
toby/
On 10/06/16 11:07, Tobias Brodel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on porting an audio application which uses the OSS
> compatibility layer. It was throwing warnings at runtime about not
>
Hi,
I've been working on porting an audio application which uses the OSS
compatibility layer. It was throwing warnings at runtime about not
being able to set flags on /dev/audio.
After searching around I found a diff written by Steven McDonald in
the misc@ archives:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:46:54AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > This is ALIX 2C1, just upgraded to current/i386 (dmesg below).
> > It serves as a wifi AP using ral(4). The console gets spammed with
> >
> > ral0: sending data fra
If somebody writes a C program that demonstrates the problem, I'm happy to
take a look. I'm not installing erlang.
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> - the new scheme is slightly more unflexible with respect to unsigned
> data: by default, every .tgz is piped thru signify -Zs, so
> pkg_add/pkg_info/fw_update WON'T even see any data if it's not signed.
> Error reporting is inadequate
On Wed, October 5, 2016 8:43 am, Radek wrote:
> Yes, my servers share the same ext IP.
> It is 5.9. I am trying to configure relayd. I commented out previous
> "rdr-to" rules from /etc/pf.conf and added as below.
> 10.0.30.101, 10.0.30.201 - it is not a mistake - ( 10.0.8.11, 10.0.8.22
> was just a
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:36:20PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:28:06PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:13:58PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:56:05PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 30,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 03:28:06PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:13:58PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:56:05PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:02:10PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 201
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 04:13:58PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:56:05PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 01:02:10PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:10:21AM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 28,
Yes, my servers share the same ext IP.
It is 5.9. I am trying to configure relayd. I commented out previous "rdr-to"
rules from /etc/pf.conf and added as below.
10.0.30.101, 10.0.30.201 - it is not a mistake - ( 10.0.8.11, 10.0.8.22 was
just an exemplary IP)
All websites are unreachable now.
#g
+1 from me, too. The umb(4) drive was great work from gerhard@!
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:36:26PM -0700, Scott Bonds wrote:
> I've got a WWAN card that required a bunch of fiddling with pppd under
> 5.9 to get online. I upgraded to 6.0 and my pppd dialup script stopped
> working. I soon discover
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks.
On 05/10/16 05:39, Scott Bonds wrote:
> I've started a stab at it. My x200 is in pieces at the moment and I
> want to retest my instructions before I submit a PR, so it may be a
> couple weeks.
>
> On 10/05, Leah Rowe wrote:
>>
- --
Leah
15 matches
Mail list logo