Re: Laptop Recommendations?

2016-11-10 Thread Brian
Thinkpads are used often by folks wanting to get that penguin OS going also. Brian On 11/10/2016 4:34 PM, STeve Andre' wrote: On 11/10/16 00:47, Nathan Koch wrote: Greetings Fair BSD Wizards, I am new to the lists. I am currently shopping for a new Xmas present for myself and am looking

Re: Laptop Recommendations?

2016-11-10 Thread STeve Andre'
On 11/10/16 00:47, Nathan Koch wrote: Greetings Fair BSD Wizards, I am new to the lists. I am currently shopping for a new Xmas present for myself and am looking for a laptop that's portable and lightweight. Preferably fast, cheap (close to free), light, and secure. If you have any

Plans for implementing RFC 5925

2016-11-10 Thread Evgeniy Sudyr
Dear OpenBSD developers, do you have any plans for implementing TCP-AO which is described in RFC 5925 and Obsoletes RFC 2385 in near future? -- With regards, Evgeniy Sudyr

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM, George Pediaditis < g.pediaditis1...@gmail.com> wrote: > thanks for the reply. I will try it next week when i have more time. > If that doesnt work im thinking if its possible to go from current > back to stable. If i try current and i have problems. It looks >

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Thuban
* George Pediaditis le [10-11-2016 23:43:20 +0200]: > thanks for the reply. I will try it next week when i have more time. > If that doesnt work im thinking if its possible to go from current > back to stable. If i try current and i have problems. It looks > possible

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread George Pediaditis
thanks for the reply. I will try it next week when i have more time. If that doesnt work im thinking if its possible to go from current back to stable. If i try current and i have problems. It looks possible but it isnt in FAQ https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors im wondering if im

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:22:45PM -0500, Donald Allen wrote: >> (FreeBSD doesn't seem to know about iwm yet). After waiting a bit, I >> will again try installing -current on a USB drive to see if the >> package problems

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 03:22:45PM -0500, Donald Allen wrote: > (FreeBSD doesn't seem to know about iwm yet). After waiting a bit, I > will again try installing -current on a USB drive to see if the > package problems have been resolved. Please do. If it's still broken in -current I'd like to

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:24:50PM +0200, George Pediaditis wrote: > i currently use stable. I updated my system a week ago. How stable is current? > I use my laptop for programming (java) and im a bit skeptical about > running current. Generally, -current is fine. But if you don't follow our

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread George Pediaditis
i currently use stable. I updated my system a week ago. How stable is current? I use my laptop for programming (java) and im a bit skeptical about running current. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:17:38PM +0200, George

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Donald Allen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:17:38PM +0200, George Pediaditis wrote: >> hello >> Im having trouble with wifi. I cant download faster than 523.94kBit/s >> Im using the iwm0 driver. > > Please try -current. This problem should

Re: Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:17:38PM +0200, George Pediaditis wrote: > hello > Im having trouble with wifi. I cant download faster than 523.94kBit/s > Im using the iwm0 driver. Please try -current. This problem should be fixed there.

Slow wifi

2016-11-10 Thread George Pediaditis
hello Im having trouble with wifi. I cant download faster than 523.94kBit/s Im using the iwm0 driver. If i use ethernet everything works fine and i get 11.99MBit/s I have tried uninstall/install the drivers again and without trunk0 interface but nothing changes. My etc files are hostname.iwm0

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

2016-11-10 Thread Comète
10 novembre 2016 12:50 "Stefan Sperling" a écrit: > Yes, that is worth trying as a workaround if you don't have > clients that require IKEv2. If you control both ends of the > tunnel then there's absolutely no reason not to try IKEv1. > > I have never seen such a problem with

Re: Laptop Recommendations?

2016-11-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:47:52PM -0600, Nathan Koch wrote: > Greetings Fair BSD Wizards, > I am new to the lists. I am currently shopping for a new Xmas present for > myself and am looking for a laptop that's portable and lightweight. > Preferably fast, cheap (close to free), light, and

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

2016-11-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:42:13AM +, Comète wrote: > Now, I can ask the question differently: > > If I don't want the connection to be > reset every half gigabyte, should I better choose isakmpd ? Yes, that is worth trying as a workaround if you don't have clients that require IKEv2. If you

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

2016-11-10 Thread Comète
10 novembre 2016 11:00 "Stefan Sperling" a écrit: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:00:07AM +, Comète wrote: > >> Oh, should I understand that IKEv2 is unusable on production ? > > This question is counter-productive because it demotivates volunteers. My goal wasn't to

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

2016-11-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:00:07AM +, Comète wrote: > Oh, should I understand that IKEv2 is unusable on production ? This question is counter-productive because it demotivates volunteers. Developers may help you out of kindness, or they may help you indirectly because the problem affects

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

2016-11-10 Thread Comète
9 novembre 2016 16:40 "Stuart Henderson" a écrit: > On 2016-11-09, =?utf-8?B?Q29tw6h0ZQ==?= wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've made some bandwidth tests (on 6.0 stable - amd64) between two APU2C >> boxes connected with an Ethernet cable and an IPSEC VPN using

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

2016-11-10 Thread Comète
9 novembre 2016 16:40 "Christian Weisgerber" a écrit: > On 2016-11-09, "Comète" wrote: > >> I've made some bandwidth tests (on 6.0 stable - amd64) between two APU2C >> boxes connected with an Ethernet cable and an IPSEC VPN using IKEDv2. I get a >> maximum

Re: Laptop Recommendations?

2016-11-10 Thread bytevolcano
I seem to be doing fine on an old Panasonic Toughbook. They can be bought quite cheap if you don't mind them being several years old. Having said that, if you want a laptop that is "close to free", then expect failures to be "close to free" also. On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:47:52 -0600 Nathan Koch