Re: httpd and dokuwiki

2017-02-24 Thread Steve Williams
Yeah! I'm glad I could help out :) I get so much from these email lists it's nice to be able to actually contribute :) Have a great day. Cheers, Steve W. On 24/02/2017 9:32 PM, Predrag Punosevac wrote: Steve Williams wrote: Hi, I'm working through

Re: httpd and dokuwiki

2017-02-24 Thread Predrag Punosevac
Steve Williams wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working through configuring Nextcloud and ran into a similar issue. > > Since this is running in an OpenBSD chroot environment, you need to have > a /var/www/etc/resolv.conf for DNS resolution to work from within the >

Re: httpd and dokuwiki

2017-02-24 Thread Steve Williams
Hi, I'm working through configuring Nextcloud and ran into a similar issue. Since this is running in an OpenBSD chroot environment, you need to have a /var/www/etc/resolv.conf for DNS resolution to work from within the chroot. It might be beneficial to put a hosts file in there as well to

Re: httpd and dokuwiki

2017-02-24 Thread Asbel Kiprop
Hi. Same here. 2017-02-25 0:53 GMT+03:00 Predrag Punosevac : > I am experimenting with httpd and DokuWiki on 6.0 stable trying to test > thing before I migrate our current nginx instalation running in a FreeBSD > jail. I am getting UI message that plugin repository cold

httpd and dokuwiki

2017-02-24 Thread Predrag Punosevac
I am experimenting with httpd and DokuWiki on 6.0 stable trying to test thing before I migrate our current nginx instalation running in a FreeBSD jail. I am getting UI message that plugin repository cold not be contacted. There is nothing wrong with network and DNS. I am alo getting that extension

Re: qt creator Abort trap (core dumped)

2017-02-24 Thread Krzysztof Strzeszewski
Hi, thank you for your answer, Yes, my version is old: # pkg_info |grep qt qt-creator-1.3.1p7 cross-platform IDE for use with Qt qt4-4.8.7p10C++ X11 GUI toolkit I add new version from ports, end is ok:) Regards, Krzysztof Strzeszewski On 17.02.2017 21:50, Caspar Schutijser wrote:

Can't connect to local LAN via L2TP VPN

2017-02-24 Thread Dain Bentley
I have an OpenBSD L2TP IPSEC tunnel created and I can connect to it fine, however when I try to browse the local network I cannot. Here is my ipsec.conf file: Code: ike passive esp transport \ proto udp from xx.xx.xx.xx to any port 1701 \ main auth "hmac-sha1" enc "aes" group modp1024 \

Re: Content filtering through pf?

2017-02-24 Thread Alan Corey
I'm looking at privoxy although I'm not sure it's more appropriate than squid. I'm hoping to run this on a Raspberry Pi or Zero so it'll most likely be under Raspbian. Right now I use the standard Android "Portable Wi-Fi hotspot" in the phone. I run it open (no password) because I'm in a very

Re: Static binaries on newer releases

2017-02-24 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:08:21AM +0100, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote: > Hi, > > If I have a static binary compiled on OpenBSD release X, is that binary > expected to also run on release X+1, X+2 and X+Y? For example, a static > binary that is compiled on OpenBSD 6.0, is it expected to also run on >

Re: Static binaries on newer releases

2017-02-24 Thread Sebastien Marie
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:08:21AM +0100, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote: > Hi, > > If I have a static binary compiled on OpenBSD release X, is that binary > expected to also run on release X+1, X+2 and X+Y? For example, a static > binary that is compiled on OpenBSD 6.0, is it expected to also run on >

Static binaries on newer releases

2017-02-24 Thread Martijn Rijkeboer
Hi, If I have a static binary compiled on OpenBSD release X, is that binary expected to also run on release X+1, X+2 and X+Y? For example, a static binary that is compiled on OpenBSD 6.0, is it expected to also run on 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3? The reason for asking is a Haskell stack issue [0] that