Re: New support

2017-04-03 Thread Peter Wens
0 C Netherlands P T Huizen Z 1273 LD O Wenka Computer Systems I A Delta 81 M i...@wenka.nl U http://www.wenka.nl/en/ B +31 85 111 8800 X N IT security, networking and open source software consultancy. OpenBSD-based networking and VoIP support.

Re: Install fail on Latitude E64460 : disk not recognised

2017-04-03 Thread lawgiver
On 4/3/2017 at 1:31 PM, "Thuban" wrote: >I try to help a friend installing OpenBSD on a Dell Latitude E6440. >It seems the disk (SSD) isn't recognised, only the USB stick is >found by >the installer, even with the last snapshot. Is your situation perhaps similar to the

Install fail on Latitude E64460 : disk not recognised

2017-04-03 Thread Thuban
Hello, I try to help a friend installing OpenBSD on a Dell Latitude E6440. It seems the disk (SSD) isn't recognised, only the USB stick is found by the installer, even with the last snapshot. You can see the dmesg and installer output as screenshots below. (yes, it's not ideal but that is the best

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-03 Thread Simen Stavdal
Anycast with ospf and ipv6 could be a fun tutorial... /S On 2 Apr 2017 22:27, "Luke Small" wrote: > It might be a fun idea to share what a really locked down desktop system > pf.conf would look like like if you are running a chain of DNS services (or > something that

ikedv2 + rdomains + nat = tcp works, udp doesn't

2017-04-03 Thread Scott Bonds
Hi everyone! I like to play with all the cool toys the devs give us, because, you know, they are there, and it helps me learn. One of my favorite walls to bang my head against is automatically connecting my (OpenBSD-stable) laptop to the internet and automatically keeping it connected as I

Re: how is IPv6 over pppoe supposed to work?

2017-04-03 Thread Sterling Archer
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi folks, > > AFAICT adding 2 lines to hostname.pppoe0 (as shown in the man > page) doesn't give you a full featured IPv6 subnet yet. Is there > some support for IPV6CP

how is IPv6 over pppoe supposed to work?

2017-04-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi folks, AFAICT adding 2 lines to hostname.pppoe0 (as shown in the man page) doesn't give you a full featured IPv6 subnet yet. Is there some support for IPV6CP (RFC 5072) in OpenBSD? Google mentioned some "dhcp6c", but its not in 6.0, is it?

New support

2017-04-03 Thread Peter Wens
0 C Netherlands P T Huizen Z 1273 LD O Wenka Computer Systems I A Delta 81 M i...@wenka.nl U http://www.wenka.com/en/ B +31 85 111 8800 X N IT security, networking and open source software consultancy. OpenBSD-based networking and VoIP support.

Re: pppoe takes 3 or 4 minutes to come up

2017-04-03 Thread Mihai Popescu
> Of course I have added the line to rc.shutdown, as you suggested. On a reboot > the >pppoe line comes up almost instantaneously. Back when I was on pppoe, after a quick reboot I used to get some messages like "connection it is already in XXX state" or so, I don;t really remember the exact

Re: kernel panic question

2017-04-03 Thread Edgar Pettijohn
Is it a soekris? If so http://wiki.soekris.info/Installing_OpenBSD. If not https://www.openbsd.org/report.html Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 3, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Alexei Malinin wrote: > > Hello. > > I have a case of OpenBSD-5.9 (i386) kernel panic. I'd like to be

kernel panic question

2017-04-03 Thread Alexei Malinin
Hello. I have a case of OpenBSD-5.9 (i386) kernel panic. I'd like to be pointed out to possible causes of the problem. Please tell me what info should I include to send useful kernel panic report. Now I have this: uvm_fault(0xd0ba6660, 0xdaf25000, 0, 1) -> e kernel: page fault trap, code=0

Re: pppoe takes 3 or 4 minutes to come up

2017-04-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Stuart, On 04/02/17 12:42, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > Problem is that the pppoedev ethernet interface comes down too soon and > the pppoe disconnect message can't be sent. A fix for this was being > discussed but late for 6.1. "ifconfig pppoe0 down" in rc.shutdown should > help that

Re: pppoe takes 3 or 4 minutes to come up

2017-04-03 Thread Kapfhammer, Stefan
Harald, I don't know how you do the VLAN tagging for Deutsche Telekom, but this article will help you: http://un.geeig.net/openbsd-vdsl.html Here is my ifconfig pppoe0: pppoe0: flags=8851 mtu 1492 index 9 priority 0 llprio 3 dev: vlan7

Re: pppoe takes 3 or 4 minutes to come up

2017-04-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi folks, On 04/02/17 11:48, Bryan Linton wrote: > On 2017-04-02 10:47:41, Konstantin Schukraft wrote: > > "man 4 pppoe" explains this better than I could. To wit: > > 8<--- > > KERNEL OPTIONS

Re: pppoe takes 3 or 4 minutes to come up

2017-04-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
On 04/02/17 11:46, Kapfhammer, Stefan wrote: > Harald, could you please post > the full output of 'ifconfig pppoe0'‎? > After successful established connection. > > Of course without credentials :) > Sure: # ifconfig pppoe0 pppoe0: flags=8851 mtu 1500

Re: maximum number of interfaces

2017-04-03 Thread Janne Johansson
I think I did some 25k tun devices in a VM long time ago. It would bomb at 27k or so, if my memory serves right. 2017-04-03 4:08 GMT+02:00 Edgar Pettijohn : > Is there a maximum number of network interfaces that can be configured? I > looked around in /usr/include to

Van Jacobson network channels

2017-04-03 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
Hi all, i'm reading some networking stuff and I saw Van Jacobson presentation about net channels concept. For me, as user that doesn't know net internals, this presentation seems quite reasonable. Beside that it's about linux network stack, what net gurus think about VJ net channels ?

Re: Installer disk info improvement (was - Re: querying scsi id/wwn for scsi disk)

2017-04-03 Thread Jiri B
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 06:14:50PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > Robert Peichaer wrote: > > Parsing dmesg output always tends to be fragile, but what about this? > > Use whatever is enclosed in <> in the dmesg output for a disk and get > > the size from disklabel. > > This looks insane. If somebody