Re: S-nail, ssh, and vi

mar...@martinbrandenburg.com wrote: > > From owner-misc+M164041=martin=martinbrandenburg@openbsd.org Sat Apr 22 > > 21:43:17 2017 > > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:42:55 -0400 > > From: Predrag Punosevac > > To: misc@openbsd.org > > Subject: S-nail, ssh, and vi > > > >

Re: understanding ldapd log error messages

Predrag Punosevac write: > Hi misc, > > ldapd on one of my two ldap servers stop working overnight > ldapd died again overnight. I noticed that this started happening not right after the upgrade to 6.1 but less than 24h after I added a person to my LDAP database. How do I go about debugging a

Re: S-nail, ssh, and vi

> From owner-misc+M164041=martin=martinbrandenburg@openbsd.org Sat Apr 22 > 21:43:17 2017 > Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 21:42:55 -0400 > From: Predrag Punosevac > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: S-nail, ssh, and vi > > Can anybody help me understand what am I seeing. Namely

S-nail, ssh, and vi

Can anybody help me understand what am I seeing. Namely I am trying to send an e-mail using S-nail 14.8.12 (the last one which cleanly compiles on OpenBSD). Actual package is 14.8.9. Ever since I upgraded to 6.1 I noticed that if I try to use ~v in order to load my e-mail into vi from the base

Intel Corporation 82576 Virtual Function not recognized

Hi, I'm playing a little bit with KVM and SR-IOV and OpenBSD doesn't recognize 'Intel Corporation 82576 Virtual Function'[1], ie. VF on my Intel 82756 dual-port network card activated on a Linux box. ... vendor "Intel", unknown product 0x10ca (class network subclass ethernet, rev 0x01) at pci0

Re: Bad kernel for OpenBSD 6.1 sparc64 ?

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Jeff wrote: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 06:13:47PM -0600, Jeff wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0. > > > I attempted to update to OpenBSD 6.1 using the files first

Re: tmux fail to start when using if-shell in .tmux.conf

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 11:21:17PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote: > > Hi! > > > > After upgrading to today's snapshot (amd64, April 22) tmux refused to > > load with exit status 1 and error message 'lost server'. I quickly found the >

Re: tmux fail to start when using if-shell in .tmux.conf

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote: > Hi! > > After upgrading to today's snapshot (amd64, April 22) tmux refused to > load with exit status 1 and error message 'lost server'. I quickly found the > culprit in my .tmux.conf; a left over experimental if-shell statement

Re: Strange PF behaviour after 6.0 -> 6.1 pgrade

> On 21 Apr 2017, at 14:22, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote: > > >> On 21 Apr 2017, at 10:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> On 2017-04-20, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote: >>> Could it be any buffers that is causing this in 6.1 but not in 6.0 ? >> >>

Re: flaky network connection after 6.1 upgrade

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:08:01AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:29:22PM -0500, Colton Lewis wrote: >> > > Can you show me a dmesg please, specifically the lines which are >> > > related to

tmux fail to start when using if-shell in .tmux.conf

Hi! After upgrading to today's snapshot (amd64, April 22) tmux refused to load with exit status 1 and error message 'lost server'. I quickly found the culprit in my .tmux.conf; a left over experimental if-shell statement I used a while ago when I needed nested tmux sessions: if-shell "echo

BeagleBone Black GPIO

Hello Misc, I'm trying to get a BeagleBone Black talking onewire and i2c via GPIO to several off-board ICs through gpioow(4) and gpioiic(4) respectively. I've got the following in /etc/rc.securelevel: # Set GPIO pin directions for USR LEDs and give them names gpioctl gpio1 21 set out USR0

Re: spamd and outlook.com

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:51:36 -0700 Kurt H Maier wrote: > What I don't do it set an outgoing voicemail greeting informing > correspondents that my time is more valuable than theirs, and if they > want to contact me I have a list of hoops through which they must > jump. > > That