On 04/28/17 09:43, trondd wrote:
On Fri, April 28, 2017 10:17 am, Fred wrote:
I have to agree with David - here I used chrome on a daily basis with a
minimum of two chrome windows with at least 4 tabs in each
I don't want to get into the conversation, but I thought this was funny.
I am a
Hi,
Can anyone tell me what the purpose of the hostname.vxlan files
needing to have an IP address?
If I start my bridge without an IP on my vxlan interface, it doesn't
work. However, If I put an IP on the vxlan interface, bring up the
bridge and then "ifconfig vxlan1 delete" to remove the IP
hello,
ros...@ghweb.de (Markus Rosjat), 2017.04.27 (Thu) 12:59 (CEST):
> I basically want to know if its okay to set permission on a file or
> directory for a LDAP user even if there is no local user on this machine.
>
> Hope someone understand what I mean, background is setting up a mailserver
On 2017-04-28 16:09, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi] wrote:
Have you properly configured your user?
As far as I know, raising the ulimit and being in the staff class can
not possibly be the solution. Ulimit has to be raised unless one wants
the browser(s) to constantly crash due to memory exhaustion, and
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:56:08PM +0300, G wrote:
> I should add that video on 6.1 works fine when im connected to ethernet
> So i guess the problem is with the iwm driver
It could be a driver bug but based on the information I have so far there
is nothing I can do but wait and see if somebody
I should add that video on 6.1 works fine when im connected to ethernet
So i guess the problem is with the iwm driver
On 04/28/17 18:52, G wrote:
> No dmesg didnt have any messages on OpenBSD 6.0 back then. But wifi was
> really slow and couldnt download with more than 500kbit/sec
> Now with
No dmesg didnt have any messages on OpenBSD 6.0 back then. But wifi was
really slow and couldnt download with more than 500kbit/sec
Now with wifi i get 4.81Mbps download 0.58Mbps upload 240 ms ping
and with ethernet i get 10.79Mbps download 0.80Mpbs upload 115 ms ping
On 04/28/17 18:36, Stefan
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:56:04PM +0300, G wrote:
> Hello.
> When i connect my laptop using wifi (iwm0) my browser freeze for a
> couple of seconds from time to time.
> Also when i start play videos the video freeze after a couple of seconds.
>
> My dmesg gives me
>
> device timeout
> iwm0:
Here are the details, from my everyday setup with no problems in browsing.
I use Firefox, Chromium gives me constant core files and looks chopped
at interface.
I tested many sites, Falsebook and Youtube included, no problems yet.
OpenBSD 6.1 (GENERIC.MP) #17: Thu Mar 30 21:37:57 MDT 2017
Whats your hardware? Are you running openbsd 6.1?
I had alot of problems with my firefox and chrome a couple of months
ago. (OpenBSD 6.0).
I couldnt play videos on firefox. Not even youtube. I could play videos
on iridium but i had to clear browsing data etc almost every day
otherwise the browser
On 04/28/17 09:00, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
wrote:
Dear everyone,
With the above disclaimer said, and still knowing the potential for a
war, I must say this: There is not much hope for OpenBSD to ever become
a desktop (or
On Fri, April 28, 2017 10:17 am, Fred wrote:
> I have to agree with David - here I used chrome on a daily basis with a
> minimum of two chrome windows with at least 4 tabs in each
I don't want to get into the conversation, but I thought this was funny.
I am a heavy tabs user. I currently have
"Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]" writes:
> Exactly. Which is why I'm asking -- not expecting anyone to give a full
> answer. I want to know what people who have been working on this issue
> have already found out. I assume there is at least some basic
> understanding of why browsers
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Anders Andersson wrote:
> From what I read, it seems as if the problems are mostly from when you
> try websites which are heavy on javascript. Let me butt in as a grumpy
> not-so-old man and point out that there's nothing even remotely
> "secure by
On 28/04/17(Fri) 16:20, Anders Andersson wrote:
> [...]
> From what I read, it seems as if the problems are mostly from when you
> try websites which are heavy on javascript.
If javascript was the problem others OSes would suffer as well.
> Let me
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
wrote:
>
>> Have you properly configured your user?
>
> As far as I know, raising the ulimit and being in the staff class can
> not possibly be the solution. Ulimit has to be raised unless one wants
> the browser(s) to
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
> wrote:
>>> You ask for peace but your whole post is highly explosive.
>>
>> No, it is not.
>>
>> I'm just expressing myself directly -- as us
On 04/28/17 14:00, David Coppa wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
wrote:
Dear everyone,
With the above disclaimer said, and still knowing the potential for a
war, I must say this: There is not much hope for OpenBSD to ever become
a desktop (or
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
wrote:
>> You ask for peace but your whole post is highly explosive.
>
> No, it is not.
>
> I'm just expressing myself directly -- as us aspergers often do.
>
Then as a real asperger come with hard evidence supporting your
On 28/04/17(Fri) 14:03, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi] wrote:
> > If you can answer this question you've already done 50% of the work.
>
> Exactly. Which is why I'm asking -- not expecting anyone to give a full
> answer. I want to know what people who have been working on this issue
> have already found
> Have you properly configured your user?
As far as I know, raising the ulimit and being in the staff class can
not possibly be the solution. Ulimit has to be raised unless one wants
the browser(s) to constantly crash due to memory exhaustion, and that
I havedone. But really: adding a normal
> If you can answer this question you've already done 50% of the work.
Exactly. Which is why I'm asking -- not expecting anyone to give a full
answer. I want to know what people who have been working on this issue
have already found out. I assume there is at least some basic
understanding of why
> You ask for peace but your whole post is highly explosive.
No, it is not.
I'm just expressing myself directly -- as us aspergers often do.
Should I keep smiling after every sentence and how would that change
the actual fact, that using a web browser in OpenBSD is and has for a
very long time
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
wrote:
> Dear everyone,
> With the above disclaimer said, and still knowing the potential for a
> war, I must say this: There is not much hope for OpenBSD to ever become
> a desktop (or laptop) OS if the nightmarish
On 28/04/17(Fri) 12:18, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi] wrote:
> [...]
> Now, can anyone provide a relatively clear description of what it is
> that make the same browsers (Firefox, Seamonkey, Chrome) that work
> fine in Linux, Windows and OS X so ridiculously slow when they are
> being run on OpenBSD?
If
Hello.
When i connect my laptop using wifi (iwm0) my browser freeze for a
couple of seconds from time to time.
Also when i start play videos the video freeze after a couple of seconds.
My dmesg gives me
device timeout
iwm0: fatal firmware error
iwm0: device timeout
iwm0: device timeout
wsmouse1
For testing I would also recommend you to make sure both OSes provide
browser with the same amount of RAM (i.e. unlimit your limits in
/etc/login.conf) and I would also browse ports email list probably and
search for patch limiting amount of RAM which is allocated for firefox
javascript engine. I
I use OpenBSD because it reliably breaks my code when I have done
something wrong.
Browsers, meanwhile, seem to do a lot of things wrong (look at what is
needed to compile the things, or how people compare browser
functionality). I suspect you would be better off getting a $100..$200
chromebook
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Jyri Hovila [iki.fi]
wrote:
> Now, can anyone provide a relatively clear description of what it is
> that make the same browsers (Firefox, Seamonkey, Chrome) that work
> fine in Linux, Windows and OS X so ridiculously slow when they are
> being
Dear everyone,
I'm well aware of the bashing potential this message contains, and
kindly ask you not to resort to the usual "offence is the best defence"
strategy. I've been in the scene for a long time (you'll find my first
e-mails to this list almost two decades ago) and I'm well aware of how
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Hiltjo Posthuma
Datum: 28.04.17 11:34 (GMT+01:00)
An: Markus Rosjat
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: relayd splice timeout
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:11:56PM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> Hi there,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:11:56PM +0200, Markus Rosjat wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I was playing arround wit relayd just to get a feeling for it. So I started
> with relaying a ssh connection to a machine behind my gateway.
>
> But it seems there is some kind of config value I miss because after
One quick note. The sources here are against 6.1 not -current, in order to
compile against -current I'M sure it'll have to be put up to speed.
Regards,
-peter
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:07:37AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-04-25, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In the past I've been examining signed binaries in the OpenBSD system.
> > I wrote some kernel code for this, but I'm stuck before it got good. In
> >
On 2017-04-28, Peter Bill wrote:
> I found a website that provides man.openbsd.org via HTTPS:
>
> https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/845068942762762241
>
> https://man.filippo.io/
>
> Have a great weekend!
>
>
You can do the same yourself with relayd.
I found a website that provides man.openbsd.org via HTTPS:
https://twitter.com/FiloSottile/status/845068942762762241
https://man.filippo.io/
Have a great weekend!
36 matches
Mail list logo