On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> >
> > boot> hd0a:/bsd.61
> > cannot open hd0a:/etc/random.seed: No such file or directory
> > booting hd0a:/bsd.61:
> I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of
> external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to
> my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device
> nodes in /dev.
>
> How do people deal with this? For now, I've got the following
I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of
external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to
my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device
nodes in /dev.
How do people deal with this? For now, I've got the following in
I know about m:tier. I thought there were plans for binary security
patches on stable without using m:tier.
On 09/01/2017 12:58 PM, GSO wrote:
> M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
>
> On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>>> Yes, see:
The sudoreplay event loop was rewritten in 1.8.21. The bug only
occurs when logging input as well as output. I've reproduced this
now and will debug it later today.
- todd
Yess, openup... amazing tool and call syspatch, too! :p
Le 09/01/17 à 11:58, GSO a écrit :
> M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
>
> On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>>
>> I think he
M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>
> I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
> for the base system.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
Yes
On 09/01/2017 12:54 PM, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>
> I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
> for the base system.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
for the base system.
Regards,
Aaron
--
Web: https://drkhsh.at/ or http://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion/
Gopher: gopher://drkhsh.at or gopher://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion
GPG:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:01:42PM +0300, G wrote:
> A couple of months ago i have read this
>
> https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf
>
> are there any new developments for packages binary updates?
Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
A couple of months ago i have read this
https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf
are there any new developments for packages binary updates?
thanks in advance
Building your own kernel (on your fast machine with lots of memory),
stripped of every driver your machine doesn't have, can get you a bit
further on memory constrained machines. This gets you into
unsupported land, but if you want support you're probably best of
spending a nickel and getting a
A few quick tests on 6.1-i386 in a VM showed that 20M seems to be minimum
now, at 17-19M disk setup would segfault late in the installation and at
16M em0 couldn't get TX stuff allocated, so that failed even earlier.
2017-09-01 9:43 GMT+02:00 Mike Larkin :
> On Thu, Aug
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:57:40PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> > I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
> > my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
> > machine I ever
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
> my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
> machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked
> properly. It did (after
I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as
my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first
machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked
properly. It did (after changing the CMOS battery), but booted into
OpenBSD 4.1... yeah, just a
16 matches
Mail list logo