Re: 6.1 fails to boot on a 486

2017-09-01 Thread Andrew Daugherity
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote: > > > > boot> hd0a:/bsd.61 > > cannot open hd0a:/etc/random.seed: No such file or directory > > booting hd0a:/bsd.61:

Re: How do you deal with many disks?

2017-09-01 Thread Jacqueline Jolicoeur
> I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of > external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to > my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device > nodes in /dev. > > How do people deal with this? For now, I've got the following

How do you deal with many disks?

2017-09-01 Thread Paul de Weerd
I make extensive use of softraid crypto on two internal and a bunch of external disks. This results in up to 32 sd(4) devices attaching to my machine. However, by default MAKEDEV only creates 10 sd device nodes in /dev. How do people deal with this? For now, I've got the following in

Re: binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread G
I know about m:tier. I thought there were plans for binary security patches on stable without using m:tier. On 09/01/2017 12:58 PM, GSO wrote: > M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/ > > On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote: >>> Yes, see:

Re: sudoreplay in sudo 1.8.21 on 6.2-snapshot

2017-09-01 Thread Todd C. Miller
The sudoreplay event loop was rewritten in 1.8.21. The bug only occurs when logging input as well as output. I've reproduced this now and will debug it later today. - todd

Re: binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread Stephane HUC "PengouinBSD"
Yess, openup... amazing tool and call syspatch, too! :p Le 09/01/17 à 11:58, GSO a écrit : > M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/ > > On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote: >>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch >> >> I think he

Re: binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread GSO
M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/ On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote: >> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch > > I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only > for the base system. > > Regards, > Aaron >

Re: binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread G
Yes On 09/01/2017 12:54 PM, Aaron Marcher wrote: >> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch > > I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only > for the base system. > > Regards, > Aaron >

Re: binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread Aaron Marcher
> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only for the base system. Regards, Aaron -- Web: https://drkhsh.at/ or http://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion/ Gopher: gopher://drkhsh.at or gopher://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion GPG:

Re: binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:01:42PM +0300, G wrote: > A couple of months ago i have read this > > https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf > > are there any new developments for packages binary updates? Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch

binary updates on stable?

2017-09-01 Thread G
A couple of months ago i have read this https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf are there any new developments for packages binary updates? thanks in advance

Re: 6.1 fails to boot on a 486

2017-09-01 Thread Paul de Weerd
Building your own kernel (on your fast machine with lots of memory), stripped of every driver your machine doesn't have, can get you a bit further on memory constrained machines. This gets you into unsupported land, but if you want support you're probably best of spending a nickel and getting a

Re: 6.1 fails to boot on a 486

2017-09-01 Thread Janne Johansson
A few quick tests on 6.1-i386 in a VM showed that 20M seems to be minimum now, at 17-19M disk setup would segfault late in the installation and at 16M em0 couldn't get TX stuff allocated, so that failed even earlier. 2017-09-01 9:43 GMT+02:00 Mike Larkin : > On Thu, Aug

Re: 6.1 fails to boot on a 486

2017-09-01 Thread Mike Larkin
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 11:57:40PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote: > > I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as > > my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first > > machine I ever

Re: 6.1 fails to boot on a 486

2017-09-01 Thread Mike Larkin
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:04:40AM -0500, Andrew Daugherity wrote: > I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as > my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first > machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked > properly. It did (after

6.1 fails to boot on a 486

2017-09-01 Thread Andrew Daugherity
I recently dug out of the closet my old IBM PS/2E, which had served as my firewall box from 2000ish-06, and was in fact the very first machine I ever installed OpenBSD on, to see if it still worked properly. It did (after changing the CMOS battery), but booted into OpenBSD 4.1... yeah, just a